Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 313 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
7,068
9,813
106
According to this Anandtech review:


The average SPECINT 2017 ST increase from Zen3 to Zen4 is 23% considering the average of all substests, considering the platform differences there is probably some lower margin due to the cores only because of memory BW advantage of Zen4, which should not exist with Zen5.
1711383174533.png
Zen3 is the more relevant one since both are pure tocks.
 

inf64

Diamond Member
Mar 11, 2011
3,884
4,692
136
According to this Anandtech review:


The average SPECINT 2017 ST increase from Zen3 to Zen4 is 23% considering the average of all substests, considering the platform differences there is probably some lower margin due to the cores only because of memory BW advantage of Zen4, which should not exist with Zen5.
You have to adjust for the difference in clocks for both Zen 3 and Zen 4. Once adjusted, the difference is about 12-13% in favor of Zen 4 (per core, per clock, average of all subtests).
For Zen 2 vs Zen 3, the average is exactly 19%, just as AMD claimed.
 

AMDK11

Senior member
Jul 15, 2019
473
407
136
So the +40% for Zen 5 in SPEC2017 is from Jim Keller's slide?

What impact can AVX512 have on the bottom line in SPEC?
 

leoneazzurro

Golden Member
Jul 26, 2016
1,114
1,867
136
I said
You have to adjust for the difference in clocks for both Zen 3 and Zen 4. Once adjusted, the difference is about 12-13% in favor of Zen 4 (per core, per clock, average of all subtests).
For Zen 2 vs Zen 3, the average is exactly 19%, just as AMD claimed.
I said "ST", not "IPC". In any case, 40%+, if confirmed, appears huge considering the Zen3->Zen4 jump, even if it factored further clock increases (and again, I am not saying there will be, only comparing generational jumps).
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
7,068
9,813
106

Abwx

Lifer
Apr 2, 2011
11,884
4,873
136
Dunno if it was already posted but that clear the things about the time line :

AMD added that although Strix Point will be released at the end of this year, it is expected that consumers will actually receive the product in the early first half of next year.

 

AMDK11

Senior member
Jul 15, 2019
473
407
136
Is the SPEC2017 Granite Ridge sample test available online?

As for the K7, the core without L2 consists of 22 million transistors, while the Pentium III only has 9.5 million transistors. So considering that the K7 has over twice as many transistors compared to the Pentium III, it wasn't crazy. I realize that the lion's share of K7 is the huge for those times L1-I+L1-D 128KB compared to L1-I+L1-D 32KB in Pentium III.

It seems that L1 in K7 has quite an influence on the advantage of IPC over PIII.
 
Last edited:

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
7,068
9,813
106
Is the SPEC2017 Granite Ridge sample test available online?
Of course no, people would get sent into the dungeon for leaks of that caliber.
As for the K7, the core without L2 consists of 22 million transistors, while the Pentium III only has 9.5 million transistors
Good news everyone!
Zen5 is also loaded on logic xtors facilitating cool uarch features.
So considering that the K7 has over twice as many transistors compared to the Pentium III, it wasn't crazy.
Intel had a lot better L2 in all ways, bigger L1 on K7 was a cope measure more or less.
 

AMDK11

Senior member
Jul 15, 2019
473
407
136
K7 core complexity compared to PIII over 2x xtors with only +6% higher IPC Integer. In FP there was a much bigger difference in favor of K7, which I cannot dispute.
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
7,068
9,813
106
K7 core complexity compared to PIII over 2x xtors with only +6% higher IPC Integer.
Yes because it has to cope with a much worse L2.
Which also made the OG 1GHz Athlon a meme.
Then, I guess ... 'Strix Halo' on the shelves around autum'25 @3NP ...
-halo is CES'25.
If you look at the 2024 Zephy G14 it looks kinda sus with lower system power target over the 2022/2023 one.
You can guess why yourself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kolifloro

Kolifloro

Member
Mar 15, 2023
31
27
61
-halo is CES'25.
If you look at the 2024 Zephy G14 it looks kinda sus with lower system power target over the 2022/2023 one.
You can guess why yourself.

Honestly, nothing against of 'Zephyrus G14' ... but I tend to fantasize with a 'Stix Halo' mounted over a 'Thinkpad P16' ... ... that's why I am guessing it might happen around AUTUMN ...

Thank you either way !!!

:)


Ps.- I also hope the 'delay' might help with the 3NP manufactoring process ...
 

AMDK11

Senior member
Jul 15, 2019
473
407
136
Yes because it has to cope with a much worse L2.
Which also made the OG 1GHz Athlon a meme.
View Pentium III Coppermine and K7 Athlon Thunderbird test results. Both have L2 256KB on the same chip as the core.


The differences are not big at all. Sometimes they are close to each other, sometimes one leads, sometimes the other, but there is not a huge/crushing gap between them. I doubt that the differences in favor of the K7 will be noticeable at all under normal use. Of course, depending on the application.

For my part, I'm finishing the K7 topic. Let's focus on Zen 5.
 
Last edited:

Tuna-Fish

Golden Member
Mar 4, 2011
1,665
2,530
136
Thunderbird was released many months after Coppermine, the lineup in the race to 1 GHz was Athlon Classic vs Coppermine.

In any case, 64/64 L1 caches were not a cope measure, they were genuinely very useful, especially for games. And when AMD fixed their L2 with thunderbird, that deficiency was gone while they still had the advantage of the bigger but just as fast L1.
 

AMDK11

Senior member
Jul 15, 2019
473
407
136
Release time is one thing. For me it's about the technical aspect. If the average performance between Thunderbird and Coppermine is quite equal, the K7 on Slot-A must have performed worse because Thunderbird has about 8% advantage over Pluto.
 

gdansk

Diamond Member
Feb 8, 2011
4,568
7,681
136
Regarding K7/Pentium 3 era:
The Katmai contains 9.5 million transistors, not including the 512 Kbytes L2 cache (which adds 25 million transistors).

With respect to Zen 5 I don't think Intel is in a good position. AMD can *affordably* spam cache to be competitive even if Arrow Lake is better than Zen 5 in 1T. And yet most signs point to Zen 5 being a much bigger change than Arrow Lake.