Please explain how a car or a TV is different from a PC with regards to startup time. They are both using computer based systems (yes cars have infotainment system etc too!). You turn them on. You want them to be working as quickly as possible so you can start using them. And then you use them for quite some time. Very similar. Why are you ok with sitting idle for 60 seconds and waiting until you can use your PC, but not prepared to wait the same time before you start using your TV or car?
Also, I might add that I've worked with several different consumer electronic products, and one of the top requirements is
always to get the startup time as quick as possible. Often it's being chased in 100 millisecond steps. Something like 60 seconds which you are ok with is totally unacceptable. It's DOA. Consumers don't want it. You won't get the contract.
That said, everyone is different. And if you're ok with 60 second startup times then good for you. But to me it just seems weird to accept that, when there are competing PCs that are able to boot up in 10-15 seconds. I still don't see why you'd rather have a 60 second boot-up time to no benefit. Maybe it's some party trick to show that your PC can survive a 60 second boot-up.