Perhaps if he gets "pushed over the edge" so easily (by his own constituents no less), he is unfit to serve as an elected public official representing the people he detests so much.
But detestation is surely representative of his constituents no?
Perhaps if he gets "pushed over the edge" so easily (by his own constituents no less), he is unfit to serve as an elected public official representing the people he detests so much.
Coming from you that's simply a truism.But detestation is surely representative of his constituents no?
Perhaps if he gets "pushed over the edge" so easily (by his own constituents no less), he is unfit to serve as an elected public official representing the people he detests so much.
Coming from you that's simply a truism.
Is there an argument in there?![]()
Republicans are kicked out of office for tapping their foot in a bathroom. Democrats assault their constituents and its A-OK with the lefties!
You are that living laugh line, a caricature of your own twisted self. You own yourself just about every time you open your yap.
he is just the mirror image of yourself (and a few others here).
Given that this was a Democratic Congressman assaulting citizens who are perceived to be right-wing, I obviously knew that some people would rush to justify what he did; that's part of the reason I posted this. But even I'm surprised by the extent of the eagerness to defend a clearly illegal and indefensible assault based on the political ideologies of those involved (just check the comment section for how extreme that mentality is, and I've seen it elsewhere). Some are honest enough to admit that because the victims here were right-wing advocates, they should be presumed to have provoked this and got what they deserved (who knew that the law of assault depends upon the political affiliation of aggressor and victim?), while others -- amazingly -- continue to fantasize about all sorts of events that they claim probably happened off camera to mitigate or justify the Congressman's actions, even though: (a) I linked to the unedited video above which shows that no such thing happened and (b) Rep. Etheridge has now issued a statement and not even he claims there were any such mitigating or justifying events that were concealed as a result of dishonest video editing. But still, the claim persists.
Some people obviously cannot accept that a Good Democrat could possibly do something bad to a conservative, and they'll continue to deny reality -- or just invent realities that don't exist -- to justify that. This is not a hard case. As Pam Spaulding said: "Sad that personal responsibility for being a violent hothead now comes with mitigation talking points. Dems need to quit it." Tribalism is a natural part of the human perspective, but it's amazing when even incidents as relatively trivial and clear-cut as this one are processed through its distorting lens. Do you think any Democrats defending Etheridge -- or most conservatives criticizing him -- would be doing so if he were a right-wing GOP Congressman from North Carolina who assaulted nice liberal students questioning him on a public sidewalk about his conservative views?
Yet another mindless waver of the bullshit false equivalency flag.
If you have the attention span and the integrity, go look at my last 100 posts and then his last 100 posts and then come back here and try, with a straight face, to make your shallowly attractive but easily disproved "point."
Integrity? Like accusing a member of being a pedophile in off-topic?
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2071724&highlight=
Yes, all of your posts are just so wonderful. Making you could make some jokes about rape next? Freaking hilarious.. Maybe when someone posts about their mother you could accuse them of incest? OMG that would be so freaking funny.
Try again. Stick to off-topic where the kiddies are in awe over your forum title.
Like I said, just about every time you open your yap . . .
Like I said, just about every time you open your yap . . .
Like I said, just about every time you open your yap . . .
"Do you fully support the Obama agenda?"
One would hope this would be obvious but P&N is full of so many one-sided buffoons they cannot help themselves but immediately jump to partisan hackery, it's a sad thing to see them do it, though. As impulsive in many ways as this idiot in the video.I think this guy (congressman) behaved badly. but he behaved badly because he's someone who is impulsive not because he belongs to the Democratic party. I'm sure he'll do just that even if he's not affiliated with any party. His party affiliation doesn't cause his bad behavior, maybe his family education does.
Sounds like an ass.
He certainly wouldn't have done it to me.
That would be excellent.I'm betting he was walking back from his mistress's apartment. No other reason go wacko like that.
What difference does it make?
Asking someone a question is no excuse for assault. I don't care who you are.
I could walk into the middle of the million man march dress in KKK gear and it still wouldn't be an excuse to assault someone.