Yes Virginia, there IS water on the moon

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

gwai lo

Senior member
Sep 29, 2004
347
0
0
Yes I can? NASA is the most wasteful organization on(and off) the planet. The science has nothing to do with it.
Are we going to go ahead and discount results that NASA puts out that don't make an immediate impact in your life? Like winglets?
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,600
13,688
136
Well, water means one more thing:

musicnote.gif
"We're whalers on the moon...."
 

rbV5

Lifer
Dec 10, 2000
12,632
0
0
That is interesting, every time I think of a moon colony I picture some futuristic dome. Going underground would make more sense.

It sure opens up some exciting possibilities. Lots of water, perhaps natural shelter and a bunch of H3.
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
No, you can't.

NASA is all about science and the further advancement of science. You can claim they are wasteful, but that doesn't change the previous statement.

Science is advanced in order to help society. NASA spends billions of dollars launching junk into space just to find water on the moon or another planet, which helps nobody and in no way advances science. How about we spend the same amount of money developing a means to get clean water to countries right here on earth that don't have it? Why waste our time trying to locate intelligent life in space at the cost of ignoring the life here on earth? NASA isn't about science or advancement.
 

meltdown75

Lifer
Nov 17, 2004
37,548
7
81
Science is advanced in order to help society. NASA spends billions of dollars launching junk into space just to find water on the moon or another planet, which helps nobody and in no way advances science. How about we spend the same amount of money developing a means to get clean water to countries right here on earth that don't have it? Why waste our time trying to locate intelligent life in space at the cost of ignoring the life here on earth? NASA isn't about science or advancement.
when's the last time you had a good cry?
 

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,970
10,450
126
Science is advanced in order to help society. NASA spends billions of dollars launching junk into space just to find water on the moon or another planet, which helps nobody and in no way advances science. How about we spend the same amount of money developing a means to get clean water to countries right here on earth that don't have it? Why waste our time trying to locate intelligent life in space at the cost of ignoring the life here on earth? NASA isn't about science or advancement.

Yea, why sail across the ocean? There probably isn't anything over there anyway. We need farmers, not a bunch of fuckin' explorers.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,774
6,337
126
Science is advanced in order to help society. NASA spends billions of dollars launching junk into space just to find water on the moon or another planet, which helps nobody and in no way advances science. How about we spend the same amount of money developing a means to get clean water to countries right here on earth that don't have it? Why waste our time trying to locate intelligent life in space at the cost of ignoring the life here on earth? NASA isn't about science or advancement.

There's only limited benefit now, but there will be huge benefits in time. The Science of the Future will be built upon the Science of today, without the Foundation you can't build a House. Or in this case, Affordable Stellar Travel, Colonies, etc.

So you think it's nonsense, but in a few Generations they'll be thanking us for providing the Basis upon which their Society is built upon.
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
There's only limited benefit now, but there will be huge benefits in time. The Science of the Future will be built upon the Science of today, without the Foundation you can't build a House. Or in this case, Affordable Stellar Travel, Colonies, etc.

I understand that science of tomorrow is built on science of today, and there are expenditures involved. But NASA spends more money than anyone with little return. They were ahead of their time, we aren't anywhere near ready for space.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,774
6,337
126
I understand that science of tomorrow is built on science of today, and there are expenditures involved. But NASA spends more money than anyone with little return. They were ahead of their time, we aren't anywhere near ready for space.

Space exploration is expensive. You want the benefits, then you pay the price.
 

Malak

Lifer
Dec 4, 2004
14,696
2
0
Space exploration is expensive. You want the benefits, then you pay the price.

My point is there are no benefits. Water on the moon? Guess what, there's water right here on Earth. Costs you a dollar, comes packaged in a bottle.