brblx
Diamond Member
- Mar 23, 2009
- 5,499
- 2
- 0
honestly, my biggest reason for that statement? mythbusters. they tested with trained guard dogs and afaik pretty much nothing worked...until they just threw the dog a piece of meat and went around him. kind of kills the defense expectations of your typical domesticated dog, imo.
and for the record i totally agree with that first paragraph. but the second one may have melted my brain while trying to decode it.
it's really just about personal preference and confidence. i don't mean to seem silly here, but i will state that i play a lot of airsoft with a full-length m16, and i have little problem navigating CQB environments. just as most of us did in the army (yes, i have done [simulated] room clearing with a real one, too), i grab the pistol grip and the magwell, tuck my arms in and have a VERY solid and manueverable position. the biggest issue is the barrel, not the stock. even if you're as 'tactical' as possible, that's still a long barrel to bring around a corner, and you're very exposed, especially if you're turning towards your dominant side. you'll be exposed for a long time before you have a shot. best option is switch hands and short stack it, which negates the stock, anyway.
i guess my opinion based on real world military training (no combat action) + real life simulations (that are, yes, games with toys) is just that it is SO much easier to maneuever a pistol around a corner than full-stocked rifle or shotgun, even with the shortest legal barrel.
Stock all the way.
IMO, pistol grip just doesn't give you the rock-sold body firing position from which to make the highest quality decisions. With a pistol grip you're aiming with your arms, squeezing with your hands, and your arms are ready to move to take up recoil. It's a recipe for muscular confusion where a shot might be let off accidentally at an unexpected sight/sound. With it locked to your shoulder the duties of your arms/hands are much simplified, and everything important is right in your immediate field of view.
That you can fire a pistol grip just fine on the range ain't the point at all, because it ain't about employing the weapon, it's about NOT employing it for ALL circumstances in which it is not called for. And in that I give the edge to the stock.
and for the record i totally agree with that first paragraph. but the second one may have melted my brain while trying to decode it.
it's really just about personal preference and confidence. i don't mean to seem silly here, but i will state that i play a lot of airsoft with a full-length m16, and i have little problem navigating CQB environments. just as most of us did in the army (yes, i have done [simulated] room clearing with a real one, too), i grab the pistol grip and the magwell, tuck my arms in and have a VERY solid and manueverable position. the biggest issue is the barrel, not the stock. even if you're as 'tactical' as possible, that's still a long barrel to bring around a corner, and you're very exposed, especially if you're turning towards your dominant side. you'll be exposed for a long time before you have a shot. best option is switch hands and short stack it, which negates the stock, anyway.
i guess my opinion based on real world military training (no combat action) + real life simulations (that are, yes, games with toys) is just that it is SO much easier to maneuever a pistol around a corner than full-stocked rifle or shotgun, even with the shortest legal barrel.
