The world’s first tokenized hedge fund has launched on the Stellar Network blockchain after raising US$1.7million in investments during its presale.
The token is Apis (APIS), managed by Apis Capital Management (ACM), and is the gateway investors use as means to access the ACM Market Neutral Volatility Strategy Fund, a proprietary volatility-based trading strategy developed by ACM.
By registering investment and purchasing tokens, buying and holding the APIS token sees investors automatically take advantage of the sophisticated fund management strategy.
This might be of interest - https://cryptocoinspy.com/worlds-first-tokenized-hedge-fund-launches-on-stellar-blockchain/
A hedge fund requires you to be a qualified investor to get involved. The block chain bypasses these rules and allows people who have no business in a hedge fund to invest. Same thing with bit coin and day trading commodities.I fail to see how selling shares via blockchain makes a hedge fund's investment strategy more compelling, but P.T. Barnum might disagree.
A hedge fund requires you to be a qualified investor to get involved. The block chain bypasses these rules and allows people who have no business in a hedge fund to invest. Same thing with bit coin and day trading commodities.
In other thoughts, what would you say to something, that said, "I have an offer. Spend $3000-4000 on computer parts (mostly GPUs), and earn $10/day (and likely declining) for an unknown period of time." Would you go for that?
I guess the answer lies on ebay, with the number of pre-owned mining rigs, on auction, with starting bids high enough to cover initial costs, and ZERO BIDS.
I'd take even a step further back. The biggest problem with cryptocurrency in general is that instead of actually solving the problems that they complain about, they mask it. In this particular case, the issue of anonymous ownership has not been solved. Instead, layers of exchanges have been created to mask the problem.Grr... exchange hacks like this are probably the biggest problem with cryptocurrency in general. It doesn't matter if the currency itself is secure, if someone can just easily steal it while it's sitting in an exchange.
What is the issue of anonymous ownership?I'd take even a step further back. The biggest problem with cryptocurrency in general is that instead of actually solving the problems that they complain about, they mask it. In this particular case, the issue of anonymous ownership has not been solved. Instead, layers of exchanges have been created to mask the problem.
Proving that you are the owner. Suddenly the anonymity is gone.What is the issue of anonymous ownership?
Proving that you are the owner. Suddenly the anonymity is gone.
Clear ownership is easy (we can serialize every transaction back to a specific buyer and seller even without cryptocurrency). Anonymity is easy (cash is basically this, anyone could steal a $20 bill from me and I'd have next to no way of ever proving that it was in fact my $20 bill). The combination has not yet been solved.
Yet, cryptocurrencies with exchanges exist which appear to give the illusion of anonymity while the root issue of ownership has not been solved. Until exchanges are unhackable, this is an unsolved problem. Unhackable public sites are probably impossible. So we probably need to give up the idea of anonymity for now.
That one I cannot help you with. If you don't understand it, then I don't think I have the skills to explain it. If the money is truely anonymous, then there is truely no way to prove that you were the owner and not the thief.You've got me confused.
What does hacking and anonymous ownership have to do with each other?
Ask that of all the crypto supporters. They are the ones claiming that crypto will solve so many of these ills (while just masking the problem instead of solving them).And how is any of this a problem cryptocurrency is supposed to solve?
That one I cannot help you with. If you don't understand it, then I don't think I have the skills to explain it. If the money is truely anonymous, then there is truely no way to prove that you were the owner and not the thief.
Ask that of all the crypto supporters. They are the ones claiming that crypto will solve so many of these ills (while just masking the problem instead of solving them).
I'll take another step back on that too. Cryptocurrency != blockchain. Yet those terms are usually used interchangeably. Long term, most, if not all of cryptocurrencies will be as valuable as torn Monopoly money. But blockchain has valuable and important uses.One issue is people referring to "crypto" as if it's one entity. It's like the Internet, there's shitty parts, and then there's revolutionary parts that are solving true issues. Crypto is far too vague of a term nowadays.
Researchers have figured out that at least some of the 2017 bitcoin price surge was from manipulation by the Bitfinex exchange:
https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/13/bitcoin-bitfinex-price-manipulation-cryptocurrency/
That's pretty much what @DrMrLordX posted in this thread earlier this year. He basically said they were using Tether to manipulate Bitcoin and altcoin prices.Researchers have figured out that at least some of the 2017 bitcoin price surge was from manipulation by the Bitfinex exchange:
https://www.engadget.com/2018/06/13/bitcoin-bitfinex-price-manipulation-cryptocurrency/
That's pretty much what @DrMrLordX posted in this thread earlier this year. He basically said they were using Tether to manipulate Bitcoin and altcoin prices.
Of course it was... you didn't really think that a 300% price spike in one month was legit... did you?