today the social worker told my dad that she has a sort of MediCal insurance that only covers emergency medicine, and definitely not liver transplants
That's the part that really irks me. How much more of an "emergency" can there be with a terminal liver illness and 2 weeks or so to live? :| Typical government bureaucrat thinking. :|
If it was my liver, I'd certainly think it was an emergency. Would her insurance cover the transplant if she had been in a car accident, and the liver was damaged, and they were trying to save her life? What would constitute a life threatening emergency that they WOULD cover?
BTW, There are some hospitals that are obligated to treat a patient, irregardless of insurance.
While putting pressure on the government to pay for her transplant would be setting a bad precedent, and open up other transient/illegan alien health care coverage, increased health costs, etc., I think that denying her a chance at life is setting another precedent, and one that I feel is even worse. Those who have money live, those who don't die. Or where is the threshold? Say if it is something that can be done for 100,000, sure go ahead, but anything costing more, they die?
And what about insurance? Could then the same decisions be extended? Well, gee, sorry Mr. Smith, but your heart transplant will cost 800,000, your insurance will cover 500,000. Sorry, can't do it, unless you can come up with the 300,00 difference. It just costs the hospital too much, so you'll just have to die. So sorry, Mr. Smith. A nurse will be around to help you check out.
What price life?