Would you Circumcise you manchild?

[SagaLore]

Originally posted by: loki8481
no. I think circumsized penises are pretty ugly.

plus, if he wanted to be circumsized, it's a procedure that he can have done later in life. the reverse isn't as easy.

The reversise is impossible. You can stretch the skin to eventually create a fold to mimick uncut, but you still don't have the glands that were once there.

 

[SagaLore]

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I didn't realize girls had penises with foreskin.

 

[Hoober]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

 

[Orsorum]

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

Link

 

[purepolly]

Before my kids were born I agonized over about this issue. Luckily, I had girls so it was a moot point.

Now after seeing 3 circumcisions during clinical this summer. I'd say definately do it. The it's a simple procedure and the little tikes barely felt it with.

 

[Hoober]

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

Link

Ok... That's not really even in the same league as a male circumcision. I'm circumcised and I have lots of feeling.

We had our son circumcised when he was born and will do it again if we have another boy. We didn't do it for religious reasons, more for hygenics and esthetics. And if he doesn't like it when he grows up, oh well. I'm not planning on suing my parents any time soon for having me circumcised. I'm rather glad they did it, actually.

 

[yhelothar]

Originally posted by: WhiteKnight
My fiance and I aren't planning on it. However, it never ceases to amaze and apall me that there are such ignorant people out there (especially women) when it comes to circumcision. I've heard women talking about how an uncircumcised penis is "just f'in disgusting".

Yes smegma is f'in disgusting

 

[NutBucket]

Originally posted by: Orsorum
No. I was not circumcised (though my dad was) and I have never asked my dad why I wasn't circumcised nor do I care. I know why I wasn't (I was already under a great deal of pain when born and circumcision would have been additional trauma that I didn't need), and I've never been ridiculed or laughed at (once, in 7th grade) because of it. For someone to bring that up is childish, IMO.

I agree completely. I'm very happy I was not cut.

 

[yhelothar]

Originally posted by: ggnl
There was a study done pretty recently in Australia (where circumcision is more accepted) concerning women's sexual satisfaction and circumcision. Among women who had slept with both cut and uncut men, over 90% reported that they received greater satisfaction from uncircumcised men.

I'm circumcised btw. My kid probably won't be.

bwahaha
Not to mention uncircumcized guys get more pleasure too..
Also the foreskin is a great lube, so you never need lotion to whack off..

 

[huesmann]

Who needs lotion?

 

[WhiteKnight]

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

Link

Ok... That's not really even in the same league as a male circumcision. I'm circumcised and I have lots of feeling.

We had our son circumcised when he was born and will do it again if we have another boy. We didn't do it for religious reasons, more for hygenics and esthetics. And if he doesn't like it when he grows up, oh well. I'm not planning on suing my parents any time soon for having me circumcised. I'm rather glad they did it, actually.

Well, female circumcision reduces sensation (albeit in some cases it probably just about eliminates certain aspects of it) just as male circumcision supposedly does. Even if you still have feeling, don't you admit it's possible that you don't have as much feeling as an uncircumcised male? Like the article on fem. circ. said, it's also for aestheic appeal, just like some people say about male circ.

 

[Yo Ma Ma]

If for no other reason, I would consider circumcision to be an unnecessary surgery & therefore an unnecessary risk. I know in general the little boys get through it all right, but the exceptions are just horribly tragic, such as this one.

Also, my brother and sil adopted 2 little boys from Russia, neither circumsized, but that was soon remedied. The first one had a lot of problems with infection and such from the surgery, not sure about the 2nd one. Poor kids, as if they hadn't been through enough already, "welcome to America."

 

[Hoober]

Originally posted by: WhiteKnight

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

Link

Ok... That's not really even in the same league as a male circumcision. I'm circumcised and I have lots of feeling.

We had our son circumcised when he was born and will do it again if we have another boy. We didn't do it for religious reasons, more for hygenics and esthetics. And if he doesn't like it when he grows up, oh well. I'm not planning on suing my parents any time soon for having me circumcised. I'm rather glad they did it, actually.

Well, female circumcision reduces sensation (albeit in some cases it probably just about eliminates certain aspects of it) just as male circumcision supposedly does. Even if you still have feeling, don't you admit it's possible that you don't have as much feeling as an uncircumcised male? Like the article on fem. circ. said, it's also for aestheic appeal, just like some people say about male circ.

Sure, it's possible I don't have as much sensation as an uncircumcised male, but what's the point? If I still have more than enough pleasure during sex, do I need more?

 

[Hoober]

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: WhiteKnight

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

Link

Ok... That's not really even in the same league as a male circumcision. I'm circumcised and I have lots of feeling.

We had our son circumcised when he was born and will do it again if we have another boy. We didn't do it for religious reasons, more for hygenics and esthetics. And if he doesn't like it when he grows up, oh well. I'm not planning on suing my parents any time soon for having me circumcised. I'm rather glad they did it, actually.

Well, female circumcision reduces sensation (albeit in some cases it probably just about eliminates certain aspects of it) just as male circumcision supposedly does. Even if you still have feeling, don't you admit it's possible that you don't have as much feeling as an uncircumcised male? Like the article on fem. circ. said, it's also for aestheic appeal, just like some people say about male circ.

Sure, it's possible I don't have as much sensation as an uncircumcised male, but what's the point? If I still have more than enough pleasure during sex, do I need more?

Or is that a stupid question?

 

[FoBoT]

yes i would, like father like son

but i have 2 daughters and won't be having anymore children

 

[Eli]

Originally posted by: notfred

Originally posted by: HomeBrewerDude
this has come up before and will likely turn into a massive flamefest about religion, abortion, and parenting.

We circumsized our 3yr old so that he will look like dad. That was our only reason. I don't think its a big deal either way, but there are plenty of people out there that do.

I know a guy who has scars over 1/2 of his body from where he was burned in a fire. He plans on throwing any sons of his into a fire for a few seconds so that they look like him.


Why the FVCK does it matter if he looks like his dad or not? Of all the people I've known in my life, I've never once met a father and son who'll whip out thier dicks and marvel at the similarity of them.

LMFAO!

Classic.

And I agree.

 

[Platypus]

I'm never having children but I'd never mutilate my son if I did.

It's really sad that people actually use 'like father like son' as a permission slip to mame and scar their children.

 

[Gurck]

Originally posted by: WhiteKnight

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

Link

Ok... That's not really even in the same league as a male circumcision. I'm circumcised and I have lots of feeling.

We had our son circumcised when he was born and will do it again if we have another boy. We didn't do it for religious reasons, more for hygenics and esthetics. And if he doesn't like it when he grows up, oh well. I'm not planning on suing my parents any time soon for having me circumcised. I'm rather glad they did it, actually.

Well, female circumcision reduces sensation (albeit in some cases it probably just about eliminates certain aspects of it) just as male circumcision supposedly does. Even if you still have feeling, don't you admit it's possible that you don't have as much feeling as an uncircumcised male? Like the article on fem. circ. said, it's also for aestheic appeal, just like some people say about male circ.

The male equivalent of that link would be cutting off the glans, something very different from circumcision. I think it's definitely a good idea for hygienic reasons.

 

[z0mb13]

if people are naked all the time, circumcising the penis is as logical as cutting your eyelid open

 

[brigden]

Bottom line: It's more hygenic (only if you're lazy) and less sensitive (less pleasurable).

 

[bootymac]

After reading this thread, I feel so enlightened :thumbsup:

 

[Yax]

Originally posted by: brigden
Bottom line: It's more hygenic (only if you're lazy) and less sensitive (less pleasurable).

more hygenic to be circumcised? I think that's a big myth. Its as easy to clean either way.

But, being uncircumcised, I think I would prefer to be circumcised. Just because during sex, there's less skin between the rubbing surfaces so more friction can occur. I just think that would make for better sex.

 

[nemesismk2]

Originally posted by: Gurck

Originally posted by: WhiteKnight

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: Hoober

Originally posted by: Orsorum

Originally posted by: nemesismk2
Circumcision is rare where I live and is mostly only done for medical reasons. Many people consider it to be a child abuse and is only widely done in third world countries and america.

Would many of you pro-circumcision people also do the same thing to your daughter and if not why would you only mutilate your sons?

I ask that same question to many people who are staunch advocates of male circumcision (who incidentally are usually harsh critics of the practice of female circumcision), and they usually don't have an answer beyond "it's more hygienic", which doesn't matter because as long as you shower once a day and wash yourself you're fine.

Call me an ignorant SOB, but what's a female circumcision?

Link

Ok... That's not really even in the same league as a male circumcision. I'm circumcised and I have lots of feeling.

We had our son circumcised when he was born and will do it again if we have another boy. We didn't do it for religious reasons, more for hygenics and esthetics. And if he doesn't like it when he grows up, oh well. I'm not planning on suing my parents any time soon for having me circumcised. I'm rather glad they did it, actually.

Well, female circumcision reduces sensation (albeit in some cases it probably just about eliminates certain aspects of it) just as male circumcision supposedly does. Even if you still have feeling, don't you admit it's possible that you don't have as much feeling as an uncircumcised male? Like the article on fem. circ. said, it's also for aestheic appeal, just like some people say about male circ.

The male equivalent of that link would be cutting off the glans, something very different from circumcision. I think it's definitely a good idea for hygienic reasons.

I take it you are a dirty bastard who doesn't shower every day? Oh you do so why don't you think people who are circumcised shower every day as well? Can't you come up with a better reason than for hygienic reasons?

 

[Shelly21]

NO NO NO NO No!

 

[notfred]

The "hygenic reasons" argument is bullcrap. You have to clean your penis regardless of whether or not you're circumcised. If you're not circumcised, you slide a bit of skin back before cleaning. It adds 1 second to the cleaning process. If you're not washing your penis... that's pretty freaking nasty regardless of whether or not you're circumcised.