• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

World exclusive: Iran will send 4,000 troops to aid Bashar al-Assad’s forces in Syria

Let's watch them settle this themselves from afar and stop giving them excuses to drag us down into their mud.

Sounds good?
 
In years to come, historians will ask how America – after its defeat in Iraq and its humiliating withdrawal from Afghanistan scheduled for 2014...
Click to expand...
Stopped reading the article after that biased remark made an appearance. This article was written either by a moron or an al Jazeera associate and I question any of the "facts" contained within.
 
If US starts sending aid it will refue to lose this no matter what that entails. If it cannot be done with a no fly and giving weapons it will help with troops. The whole thing s totally ridiculous.
 
Doppel said:
If US starts sending aid it will refue to lose this no matter what that entails. If it cannot be done with a no fly and giving weapons it will help with troops. The whole thing s totally ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Except now stepping up our game possibly involves declaring war on Iran, as we'd have to attack Iranian troops.
 
Fuck Syria, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan .... and the entire middle east. I am sick of hearing about that whole area.

We should pull everything esp. all the millions of US $ in aid to these shit holes and let them sort out their own problems. If they all gassed and nuked themselves out of existence I could not give a shit less than I already do.
 
I wish we could leave the entire area, but we can't. Too much trade and oil either originates or passes right through the middle east for us to become diplomatically and military uninvolved. Any disruption to these energy supplies means a major rippling effect to the world economy.
 
Ventanni said:
I wish we could leave the entire area, but we can't. Too much trade and oil either originates or passes right through the middle east for us to become diplomatically and military uninvolved. Any disruption to these energy supplies means a major rippling effect to the world economy.
Click to expand...

So replacing Assad with a bunch of insane Al Qaeda fundamentalists... more stable or less stable? Because that's what the US is trying to do in Syria.
 
nehalem256 said:
Sound like someone is butt-hurt that Sarah Palin looks more intelligent on Syria than the Democratic savior 😀
Click to expand...



michal1980 said:
Palin makes a stupid comment about seeing Russia and she's an idiot.

Obama says we have 56 states, and he was just tired.
Click to expand...

Even a blind squirrel finds a acorn once in a while.

Palin's said way more idiotic things than just the above. You could write an entire book on it.

Anyone who finds her remotely intelligent in world or domestic views is probably at the same level or lower in intelligence.
 
Let's just start a world war over this, Europe and the USA on one side with Hezbollah and Al Qaeda vs. Assad, Iran, Russia and China on the other. Then let everyone else pick a side and let's go at it.

WE GOTTA THINK OF THE CHILDREN!! ASSAD USED GAS!!!

World War is the only answer to this!
 
The administration is worried about the civil war spilling over the borders of Syria or engulfing the region in a regional conflict. Then we go about creating the situation that spills it over the borders and turns it into a regional conflict derp. The stupidity from this administration over Syria is simply amazing. And that isn't even getting into we are supporting radical jihadists with taxpayers money. Some of them are affiliated with AQ for fucks sake.
 
nehalem256 said:
Sound like someone is butt-hurt that Sarah Palin looks more intelligent on Syria than the Democratic savior 😀
Click to expand...

You should probably confirm she didn't read it off of her palm before rejoicing. In case you missed it earlier, Palin's a lot better reading prepared statements than answering questions requiring actual thought.

I'd wager Palin knows about as much about Syria as she knows about most things, not much. I want to know where her new house is, gotta be close enough to see Syria right? /rimshot



How funny is it the resident forum woman hater picks this woman to defend/praise? lol
 
I like the idea of quietly giving the rebels just enough weapons so that the rebels and Syria/Hezbollah/Iranian troops can all kill each other.
 
Greenman said:
Palin never made the comment as it's often quoted. Just as Al Gore never claimed to have invented the internet.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but she's still an idiot.

Anyway, this is a situation where any involvement will bite us, worse than usual. I think we should stay far away from this one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top