• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Women's March speaker tortured a man to death

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Here's her Bio http://www.donnahylton.com/donna-hylton

She was an accessory to the crime, drove the car and delivered the ransom note.


That's her own promo site, and according to the OP information hardly an innocent dragged into this. In her walk she describes everything but remorse for those harmed.

She did her time but a nice smile says nothing and with no sign of regret or remorse? I'm not buying much.
It absolutely sucks that her life was awful and there's no saying otherwise, but some had much worse done to them and didn't harm others afterwards. A tough life doesn't really get a pass. Again she served her time and maybe she has reformed, but I'm not praising.
 
Wow. That is so fucked up. I have a hard time even understanding what her dad/brother did, nevermind her fabricating the whole thing to begin with.

It was her husband and his half brother that tortured and killed the kid. And I thought that this, from the article, pretty much sums up their attitudes:

"Once acquitted of murder (the jury deliberated for barely an hour), Bryant’s husband and Milam were protected against further prosecution by the double jeopardy rule and so admitted the crime to Look magazine.

I’m no bully,” Milam said. “I never hurt a n***** in my life. But I just decided it was time a few people got put on notice … ‘Chicago boy,’ I said, ‘I’m tired of them sending your kind down here to stir up trouble, I’m going to make an example of you, just so everybody can know how me and my folks stand.’”
 
It's amusing watching a bunch of men on a forum dictate who should and should not be allowed to speak at a women's march and completely miss the symbolism in it.

What symbolism does her presence provide?

That's her own promo site, and according to the OP information hardly an innocent dragged into this. In her walk she describes everything but remorse for those harmed.

She did her time but a nice smile says nothing and with no sign of regret or remorse? I'm not buying much.
It absolutely sucks that her life was awful and there's no saying otherwise, but some had much worse done to them and didn't harm others afterwards. A tough life doesn't really get a pass. Again she served her time and maybe she has reformed, but I'm not praising.

This. Useless sociopath that deserves death.
 
It was her husband and his half brother that tortured and killed the kid. And I thought that this, from the article, pretty much sums up their attitudes:

"Once acquitted of murder (the jury deliberated for barely an hour), Bryant’s husband and Milam were protected against further prosecution by the double jeopardy rule and so admitted the crime to Look magazine.

I’m no bully,” Milam said. “I never hurt a n***** in my life. But I just decided it was time a few people got put on notice … ‘Chicago boy,’ I said, ‘I’m tired of them sending your kind down here to stir up trouble, I’m going to make an example of you, just so everybody can know how me and my folks stand.’”

Yup. Thanks for the corrections.
 
Yes I am a jackass. Doesn't change the fact that you contradicted yourself. That you don't see the optics problem of an accessory to a rather brutal murder having a voice at a woman's rally makes me wonder who the jackass truly is.

You compared an apple to a Zebra and think that you've made a point of some kind. Cool. And thanks for the confirmation of jackassery.
 
She was an accessory to the crime, drove the car and delivered the ransom note.

Maybe... seems that article is describing the torture other members of that group did.

Spurling himself interviewed Donna: “I couldn’t believe this girl who was so intelligent and nice-looking could be so unemotional about what she was telling me she and her friends had done.

How'd she have the details of the torture if she was not there participating? Really calls into question what an accessory is if you're in the room, helping the ones doing the torture... if in fact no one claimed that Donna did any of it herself. Not sure, this story is entirely new to me. And completely disgusting.

But she's certainly not innocent. Yet she served her time for the crimes she was found guilty of. But given the nature of what occurred, not sure I can simply accept anything short of execution. A terrible story all-round.
 
Last edited:
The fact that there are plans to make a movie of her life are just mind-boggling to me. But then liberal lunacy never ceases to amaze me.

Heads up liberals! Vanessa Coleman is up for parole in 2020. She's one of the people responsible for the torture and murder of Channon Christian and Chris Newsom.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murders_of_Channon_Christian_and_Christopher_Newsom

But it is Coleman who authorities suspect delivered brutal blows to Christian's vaginal region, the force of which caused a massive pooling of blood.

http://archive.is/LvwaP#selection-2045.0-2045.149

Her diary entry dated three days after the murders said, “I’ve had one HELL OF AN ADVENTURE since I’ve been in the big TN. It’s a crazy world these days! But I love the fun adventures and lessons that I’ve learned. Its going to be a long interesting year! Ha! Ha!”

But she said she was sorry and it was really the fault of the people she hung out with, so I guess that she is now worthy of hero status by liberals.
 
Here's her Bio http://www.donnahylton.com/donna-hylton

She was an accessory to the crime, drove the car and delivered the ransom note.

Did she mention the times she was the one guarding the victim? Or how he asked her for help and she refused? Because she admitted to all that too. I guess that's all okay though since she's like super sorry that it happened.

Oh wait, that's her personal website where she's trying to promote herself? Now what kind of idiot would quote from such a biased source?
 
Absolutely hilarious how desperate all the conservatives are to find some liberal somewhere to criticize for something while protecting/ignoring their routine advocates for brown genocide and such. What an ideology to be part of.
 
So why is she one of the leaders/speakers at a women's rights march? She was complicit in the rape, torture, and murder of someone. There's nothing she could have done afterwards to make her a good choice for this; I don't care if she's found Jesus, advocates for prison reform, is really sorry and did her time. Doesn't matter.

This was an important event for women's rights, it shouldn't have been tainted by allowing a POS like this around. Women's rights is critical and I'd argue under threat, this only undermines it.

I'm actually curious how exactly this undermines whatever point the movement or even whatever she was invited to speak about, other than the typical dipshit concern trolling everyone has come to expect from the right. Are you blustering tough guys armed to the teeth trembling with fearing for your lives at the hands of this woman or something? Stop being low-t beta bitches then.
 
Did she mention the times she was the one guarding the victim? Or how he asked her for help and she refused? Because she admitted to all that too. I guess that's all okay though since she's like super sorry that it happened.

Oh wait, that's her personal website where she's trying to promote herself? Now what kind of idiot would quote from such a biased source?

Perhaps you can roll over and unload one of your many Glocks on her 😛

That would teach her.

Got me.
 
Back
Top