You lack life experience and you call me delusional?
Tell you what, every month your local courts have certain days when child support hearings are held. Go to one of those courts and sit in the back row. Pay attention to how many names are called and nobody stands up.
Or, sit in the hall and listen to the court appointed attorneys telling the parents how the baby daddy or momma could not be found.
You continue to babble incoherently. Child support is yet another duhversion that has nothing to do with voting rights or the fact that millions of legitimate American voters do not have the current, state-issued, photo IDs required by most of these voter suppression laws. Fact.
Why do they not have such IDs? Because except for these new voter laws, they didn't need them. Perhaps they are elderly people like both my mother and mother-in-law: long retired, disabled, no longer driving so they let their licenses expire, already have bank accounts, don't fly, and wouldn't get carded even if they did want to buy alcohol. Maybe they're stay-at-home spouses or members of extended families who rely on other family members to do the shopping. Maybe they're very poor and don't drive because they cannot afford a car. Maybe they're students from cities with great public transportation, so they never learned to drive. Maybe they're some hybrid combination of the above. The simple fact is your proclamations about the sort of people who lack IDs are ignorant, bigoted nonsense with no relevance whatsoever to voter legitimacy.
Of course, none of this alters the real point that these suppression laws do far more harm than good. They address a non-problem -- virtually nonexistent in-person voter impersonation -- and disenfranchise millions of legitimate voters. They are all cost and effectively no benefit ... unless your objective is gaming elections by suppressing left-leaning demographics.
Facebook
Twitter