Will you give up your right to vote for $$$$?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Will you give up your right to vote for $$$$?

  • Yes

  • No, but I might if the money is higher.

  • No, it will be bad for the long term.


Results are only viewable after voting.

Ns1

No Lifer
Jun 17, 2001
55,420
1,600
126
Yeah, I can see that. But don't you vote for things like school levies and other local issues? Those are the things I care most about I guess.

I'd give it up for some cold hard cash in my bank account.
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,150
635
126
People already give up their votes without any incentive. Why should we waste more of my tax dollars for this?

For the record I'm a young conservative in CA and I always vote.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
Damn there's a lot of non voters in here. I'm surprised honestly.

I'm honestly surprised that so many people do vote. The choice is between a guy who claims to be looking out for the rich, but is only looking out for himself and a guy who claims to be looking out for the poor, but is only looking out for himself. Or you can vote for a 3rd party who claims he's not part of the establishment and wants to take care of real people, but is only looking out for himself.

Show me a person worth voting for and I'll vote. Toss up the same collection of whores who will say whatever the people funding their campaign wants them to say and I'll keep staying home.
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,150
635
126
I agree with you to some degree about the candidates. However it is the ballot initiatives and bond issues that really interest me. Voting on those issues really does matter....especially if you're a property owner.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,263
4,040
136
People already give up their votes without any incentive. Why should we waste more of my tax dollars for this?

For the record I'm a young conservative in CA and I always vote.
Instead of a parrot avatar, your's should be an extinct bird. ;)
 

Bubbleawsome

Diamond Member
Apr 14, 2013
4,834
1,204
146
$1000 is not near enough. Realistically I would need $1m per election, but I would want 500m+ so I could vote/lobby with my money.
 

Red Squirrel

No Lifer
May 24, 2003
70,540
13,791
126
www.anyf.ca
No. This would tell the government that you don't really care about voting and you'll take a paltry amount of money for it. It's basically telling them that you're ok with exchanging freedom for money. Most government corruption that we try to fight is basically exactly that. Our rights being removed in the name of money.

Not that voting actually accomplishes anything anyway, but I would not give up that right.

Lot of people choose not to vote because they hate the current system, and while I don't blame them, I say, at least go vote for green or other oddball party or something. If there is an influx of people voting for these oddball parties it sends a message.
 

gevorg

Diamond Member
Nov 3, 2004
5,070
1
0
$1000? LOL, average Joe will give it up for a $20 Starbucks gift card.
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
Sure, go ahead and take the $1000. Then 2 weeks later, the people who paid you the $1000 can raise your taxes by $1001.

So I'm out $1. That's better than usual, most guys raise my taxes $1001 without the courtesy of giving me $1000 first.
 

Ken g6

Programming Moderator, Elite Member
Moderator
Dec 11, 1999
16,694
4,657
75
Can I get another poll option?

"No, because if I don't take the money but many other do, my vote counts more." :D
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
Anyone who doesn't vote has no right to complain about anything political as they've opted to do nothing anyway :colbert:
 

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,197
126
I would if it was legal, since I live in CA, I could give some of that money to candidates to be spent in other states, where it would make a lot more difference than my vote.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
I'm honestly surprised that so many people do vote. The choice is between a guy who claims to be looking out for the rich, but is only looking out for himself and a guy who claims to be looking out for the poor, but is only looking out for himself. Or you can vote for a 3rd party who claims he's not part of the establishment and wants to take care of real people, but is only looking out for himself.

Show me a person worth voting for and I'll vote. Toss up the same collection of whores who will say whatever the people funding their campaign wants them to say and I'll keep staying home.

This
 

Humpy

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2011
4,464
596
126
Heck yeah!

In reality we should be paying people to vote.