• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Will you be in line to buy a Smart Car in 2008?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: MIKEMIKE
Originally posted by: Baked
Funny, I saw one driving around where I work last week. It's a blue one. The guy must've imported it over. It's a total chick car though.

you saw a smart roadster, owned by a member over on the car lounge.

I imagine there's more than one...

And though they're too expensive to justify the gas savings, I also would really only consider the Smart Roadster...ah vanity 🙁

Of the sub-compacts out there, the Mini is still the one I'd most likely consider...
 
Originally posted by: CombatChuk
I would buy this Smart Car...


Text

LOL cool!!! hahahah holy crap!

Anyways, as far as safety is concerned, TopGear did a crash test on a Smart Car, and damn, that thing is like a rock.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=smart+car

15k may be a bit high, but I'd like for USA to be a lot more efficient-conscient. USA is all about lavish spending and wastefulness. I want to see a trend to more efficiency. I just hate it that we stand for wastefulness to the rest of the world.
 
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Originally posted by: CombatChuk
I would buy this Smart Car...


Text

LOL cool!!! hahahah holy crap!

Anyways, as far as safety is concerned, TopGear did a crash test on a Smart Car, and damn, that thing is like a rock.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=smart+car

15k may be a bit high, but I'd like for USA to be a lot more efficient-conscient. USA is all about lavish spending and wastefulness. I want to see a trend to more efficiency. I just hate it that we stand for wastefulness to the rest of the world.

Fifth Gear, not Top Gear.
 
Originally posted by: MrsBugi
Fuel-efficient AND affordable! :thumbsup:

Yes, but assuming its prices shadow those in other markets, its fuel efficiency won't make it more affordable than most of the other sub-compacts (and compacts for that matter) out there...

...and there are more out there than I think the average person knows about...
 
Originally posted by: Willoughbyva
Perhaps in other markets gas is more expensive and the savings could be more for the owner than here in the US.

Gas savings compared to which car?

Remember, in those other markets, there are many other subcompacts...and options for smaller engines and *diesels*
 
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Originally posted by: CombatChuk
I would buy this Smart Car...


Text

LOL cool!!! hahahah holy crap!

Anyways, as far as safety is concerned, TopGear did a crash test on a Smart Car, and damn, that thing is like a rock.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=smart+car

15k may be a bit high, but I'd like for USA to be a lot more efficient-conscient. USA is all about lavish spending and wastefulness. I want to see a trend to more efficiency. I just hate it that we stand for wastefulness to the rest of the world.

Yeah, they do well in head-on collisions, but most collisions on the roads are not directly head-on. I'm willing to bet that the driver would get flattened like a pancake on a side-impact hit.
 
Originally posted by: RaistlinZ
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
Originally posted by: CombatChuk
I would buy this Smart Car...


Text

LOL cool!!! hahahah holy crap!

Anyways, as far as safety is concerned, TopGear did a crash test on a Smart Car, and damn, that thing is like a rock.
http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=smart+car

15k may be a bit high, but I'd like for USA to be a lot more efficient-conscient. USA is all about lavish spending and wastefulness. I want to see a trend to more efficiency. I just hate it that we stand for wastefulness to the rest of the world.

Yeah, they do well in head-on collisions, but most collisions on the roads are not directly head-on. I'm willing to bet that the driver would get flattened like a pancake on a side-impact hit.

Not necessarily. The biggest problem with a side-impact crash is that it is hitting the weakest part of the car. Unlike a normal car, the Smart Fortwo isn't that big. That means a side-impact crash will hit the entire frame, not just one section of one. The cage may stay together qutie well, but you're still screwed since the car will more than likely will go into a roll.
 
I was going to buy a fuel efficient car next summer for cummuting to work. 40+ MPG on highway being a requirment. Among otehr requirements.

1) Has to have AC
2) Has to be quiet when cruising at 65-70 MPH. I will NOT buy a car that is bad with road noise.

Anyways ... I was going to buy in 2007 ... this car might make me wait to 2008. IT BETTER BE QUIET though!!!
 
Originally posted by: Scouzer
they are very expensive for the size.

the waiting list in canada was nearly a year last i read

That matters on features. if they have good creature comforts ... the price might be right.

You can't say a Lamborghine is to expensive when you can just get a Corvette .. it's not a fair comparison.
 
They have been on sale here in Vancouver for quite a while, and no I wouldn't buy one...

They aren't really that affordable, and I would hate to think what happens if one gets T-boned by an Expedition (I have seen the Smart front-end crash tests, but haven't seen any side, high impact point tests)...
 
Originally posted by: shabby
Hell no, im not the kind that likes to smell his own farts...
I do like to smell my own farts and I still won't be getting one. Maybe if gas hits $10 a gallon.
 
Back
Top