Will Trump Cancel His Press Conference On Wednesday?

[Capt Caveman]

So tedious. It's clear that Repubs have no healthcare plan at all other than maybe Free Market! trickle down. It's their plan for everything.

They have no replacement and from what I've heard they need 60 votes in the Senate to pass anything which not all of the Repubs can agree on a replacement then they'd need some Dems to approve also.

 

[feralkid]

So in other words you don't care to know if Trump is taking actions because he thinks they are in the best interest of the country or if he's taking them because they are in his own personal financial interests? Amazing. You've just handed him a blank check for functionally unlimited corruption.

Glad to know you never actually cared about corruption to begin with, so thanks for clearing that up.

Was there ever any doubt?

Taj has displayed his lust for totalitarianism from the day he joined this forum.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

So in other words you don't care to know if Trump is taking actions because he thinks they are in the best interest of the country or if he's taking them because they are in his own personal financial interests? Amazing. You've just handed him a blank check for functionally unlimited corruption.

Glad to know you never actually cared about corruption to begin with, so thanks for clearing that up.

Go fsk yourself, it's not a law for him to show his tax returns. Period. If you don't like it then get a law passed requiring it of all civil servants, bureaucrats and politicians. In fact how about making it a requirement for every Government employee just so the public can be sure they're not corrupt?

 

[brycejones]

So in other words you don't care to know if Trump is taking actions because he thinks they are in the best interest of the country or if he's taking them because they are in his own personal financial interests? Amazing. You've just handed him a blank check for functionally unlimited corruption.

Glad to know you never actually cared about corruption to begin with, so thanks for clearing that up.

As long as the Glorious Leader Trump says its for the country's good who would imported_taj be to question him? He is after Glorious Leader, make sure you have his picture displayed in your home so you can gaze on his Glorious Golden Magnificence.

 

[brycejones]

Go fsk yourself

Some poor baby was triggered so easily. Guess that is about par for the course with a supporter of Dear Glorious Leader Trump.

 

[jackstar7]

So in other words you don't care to know if Trump is taking actions because he thinks they are in the best interest of the country or if he's taking them because they are in his own personal financial interests? Amazing. You've just handed him a blank check for functionally unlimited corruption.

Glad to know you never actually cared about corruption to begin with, so thanks for clearing that up.

Fascism is GO!

 

[SMOGZINN]

Why would he show his tax returns? It's not required by law and they're his tax returns. Basically he's telling you and others that want his tax returns to go fsk themselves and i'm happy with that answer.

He is allowed to say that, but that means people are not going to trust him, and that is also a consequence of telling people to go fsk themselves. It speaks very bad to his character that he doesn't care that people trust him, and that low character plays right back into the lack of trust. So, the question is why are you happy that the next President of the United States is someone that can't be trusted?

 

[imported_tajmahal]

He is allowed to say that, but that means people are not going to trust him, and that is also a consequence of telling people to go fsk themselves. It speaks very bad to his character that he doesn't care that people trust him, and that low character plays right back into the lack of trust. So, the question is why are you happy that the next President of the United States is someone that can't be trusted?

I trust him as much as I've ever trusted a politician and far more than i trusted that shithole Obama.

 

[jackstar7]

I trust him as much as I've ever trusted a politician and far more than i trusted that shithole Obama.

You poor victim.

 

[fskimospy]

Go fsk yourself, it's not a law for him to show his tax returns. Period. If you don't like it then get a law passed requiring it of all civil servants, bureaucrats and politicians.

You would need a constitutional amendment to create a new requirement for the presidency. Nice try at avoiding the point though, which is that you don't care to know if Trump is acting in his official duties in service of our interests or his own. I hope you never complain about government corruption in any way, ever, as you just showed you don't care.

In fact how about making it a requirement for every Government employee just so the public can be sure they're not corrupt?

It is a requirement for almost all other government employees, explicitly so we can see if they are corrupt.

lol.

 

[Capt Caveman]

I trust him as much as I've ever trusted a politician and far more than i trusted that shithole Obama.

You trust him that Mexico is going to pay for the wall? You trust him that he has no interests in Russia? You trust him when he says Russia did not hack and interfere with the election even though he's been provided proof? You trust him that he has great respect for women? Etc...

Troll, retard or retarded troll...

 

[SMOGZINN]

I trust him as much as I've ever trusted a politician and far more than i trusted that shithole Obama.

So, you are saying that you don't care that the POTUS can't be trusted?

How could you trust him more that Obama? Our current President is at the end of his job and has not really done anything all that bad, as can be seen by the fact that the most hostile congress in history couldn't find anything to really fault him with.

Trump has not even taken office yet and we are having to ask if he is already irredeemably corrupt.

 

[Jhhnn]

He is allowed to say that, but that means people are not going to trust him, and that is also a consequence of telling people to go fsk themselves. It speaks very bad to his character that he doesn't care that people trust him, and that low character plays right back into the lack of trust. So, the question is why are you happy that the next President of the United States is someone that can't be trusted?

Well, yeh, but being the world's greatest con man allows him to gain people's trust in other ways.

Just the way it is.

 

[raildogg]

This guy sounds like a bully, thug and a generally morally bankrupt person.

We have leaders like Trump that talk in such a disrespectful way. But this is what many people want. They themselves are this way and want their politicians to be the same.

That's why most of our politicians are probably morally bankrupt - it's because most human beings are morally bankrupt and hypocrites.

 

[KMFJD]

So far what we have learned at his 'news' conference

 

[PokerGuy]

Watching him take CNN and their little troll reporter to the woodshed was awesome. The fake news press is going to take a beating for the next 4 years......

The rest of the comments are just typical hypocritical whining from the lefties.

 

[fleshconsumed]

Gawd, I'm finally watching recording. This guys sounds dumber than GWB which I didn't think was possible. This is both gut wrenching and vomit inducing.

 

[raildogg]

I listened to some of this supposed press conference.

It was really something else. This guy called our "President" was talking junk. He says "They will respect us much more now that I'm in power." Or "Putin did something wrong but he will not do it again." Or "Companies need to be held responsible"

But the underlying tone was one of arrogance, disrespect and just simply the opposite of being decent.

Yes, these are our "leaders."

When will humanity ever wake up? When it's too late?

 

[nakedfrog]

When will humanity ever wake up? When it's too late?

Two hours after that, yeah.

 

[OrByte]

You would need a constitutional amendment to create a new requirement for the presidency. Nice try at avoiding the point though, which is that you don't care to know if Trump is acting in his official duties in service of our interests or his own. I hope you never complain about government corruption in any way, ever, as you just showed you don't care.



It is a requirement for almost all other government employees, explicitly so we can see if they are corrupt.

lol.

At the State level (where I'm at) you have to complete a conflict of interest form if you are in a position of influence of, and/or purchasing goods and services, using state funding.

I'm fairly certain the same applies at the federal level

and on this form, EVERY ASSET YOU OWN is disclosed. Along with Creditor information.

And for some reason, Trump is exempt from this requirement. Or ANY President past or future.

As for tax returns, we need to see Trump's taxes period.

 

[1sikbITCH]

Watching him take CNN and their little troll reporter to the woodshed was awesome. The fake news press is going to take a beating for the next 4 years......

The rest of the comments are just typical hypocritical whining from the lefties.

I'm afraid urine for a long 4 years. Fake news has been here since Facebook started and it's just beginning to get YUGE.

 

[raildogg]

I'm afraid urine for a long 4 years. Fake news has been here since Facebook started and it's just beginning to get YUGE.

The term Fake news is going to be cliche now. It's going to lose all its meaning and therefore, the real fake news will grow even stronger.

I think most news is fake news because most people are not seeking the truth. They are seeking things to validate themselves in one way or another. In order to seek the truth, you need to take risks, including to your own psyche and way of living.

But no one wants that.

 

[jackstar7]

Watching him take CNN and their little troll reporter to the woodshed was awesome. The fake news press is going to take a beating for the next 4 years......

The rest of the comments are just typical hypocritical whining from the lefties.

You fall for Onion stories.

 

[Ichinisan]

You didn't "prove" anything. You provided a brief history of 4chan. I have been following those claims too. They haven't provided anything that shows that this originated there. Just claims with nothing specific. Meanwhile you have every news outlet that is stating the information is coming directly from intelligence sources. They are stating that they have verified that the information comes from them. They haven't said what was in the report because they can't verify the report itself is accurate. Only where they got it from.

You can blame the "dishonest media" all you like. While I personally find the information inside the dossier suspect I don't doubt they got it from legitimate sources, not some random email from 4chan.

Who's trying to prove anything? I simply said it's wrong to imply that 4Chan/Anonymous has never had any influence.

If 4chan/Anonymous coordinates something, they don't "send a random email from 4chan." The whole idea is their anonymous members have advantageous insider access to various places and systems.

 

[imported_tajmahal]

You trust him that Mexico is going to pay for the wall? You trust him that he has no interests in Russia? You trust him when he says Russia did not hack and interfere with the election even though he's been provided proof? You trust him that he has great respect for women? Etc...

Troll, retard or retarded troll...

Did you read what i said? "I trust him as much as i've ever trusted a politician" which isn't very much, now go fuck yourself loserboy.