• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Why's the BMW 323 called a 323?

The top o the line was the 328 at the time, and i guess they didn't think bottom of the line (325) sounded different enough from the best engine available (328), so they called it the 323.

When the 3 liter 6 came around they called it by its normal displacement name, the 325
 
Originally posted by: Syringer
Did they make 323's and 325's at the same time? If so what was the difference?

just to clear that up, from 98-01 it was 323 & 328. from 01- pres. it has been 325 & 330. now they also have the 330 with the preformance package which is actually a slightly different engine, but you get the idea.
 
just to clear that up, from 98-01 it was 323 & 328. from 01- pres. it has been 325 & 330. now they also have the 330 with the preformance package which is actually a slightly different engine, but you get the idea

they also had the 316i with a 1.9 litre engine, a 318i with the same engine but 16valve and the 320i with a 2.2 litre engine. It came about in about 96 when the newer 2.5litre engine was introduced alongside the 2.8

edit also the m5 which is technically a 4.9 rather than the usually represented 5.0 iirc
 
Originally posted by: SammyBoy
The top o the line was the 328 at the time, and i guess they didn't think bottom of the line (325) sounded different enough from the best engine available (328), so they called it the 323.

When the 3 liter 6 came around they called it by its normal displacement name, the 325

You are correct.
 
...and the 316 is a 1.8l. 😕

They keep the names because ever since the mk1 3's they have had 316's, 320's and 323's.

It's a tradition thing and only a few of the line have the capacity in the number correct.
 
Originally posted by: SammyBoy
The top o the line was the 328 at the time, and i guess they didn't think bottom of the line (325) sounded different enough from the best engine available (328), so they called it the 323.

When the 3 liter 6 came around they called it by its normal displacement name, the 325
Yes, I believe you're right. But just to make sure... <steps outside and pops open hood>

Yup, it's a 2.5L... and it needs bigger wheels. 😛
 
Back
Top