Why's the BMW 323 called a 323?

Syringer

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
19,333
2
71
When it has a 2.5L engine? And then in their redesign with the same sized engine it became a 325??
 

kaizersose

Golden Member
May 15, 2003
1,196
0
76
i think they originally wanted to differentiate it from the 325.

another example:
540i - 4.4 liter engine
 

SammyBoy

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2001
3,570
1
0
The top o the line was the 328 at the time, and i guess they didn't think bottom of the line (325) sounded different enough from the best engine available (328), so they called it the 323.

When the 3 liter 6 came around they called it by its normal displacement name, the 325
 

kaizersose

Golden Member
May 15, 2003
1,196
0
76
Originally posted by: Syringer
Did they make 323's and 325's at the same time? If so what was the difference?

just to clear that up, from 98-01 it was 323 & 328. from 01- pres. it has been 325 & 330. now they also have the 330 with the preformance package which is actually a slightly different engine, but you get the idea.
 

Mingon

Diamond Member
Apr 2, 2000
3,012
0
0
just to clear that up, from 98-01 it was 323 & 328. from 01- pres. it has been 325 & 330. now they also have the 330 with the preformance package which is actually a slightly different engine, but you get the idea

they also had the 316i with a 1.9 litre engine, a 318i with the same engine but 16valve and the 320i with a 2.2 litre engine. It came about in about 96 when the newer 2.5litre engine was introduced alongside the 2.8

edit also the m5 which is technically a 4.9 rather than the usually represented 5.0 iirc
 

vetteguy

Diamond Member
Sep 12, 2001
3,183
0
0
Go drive one. You'll stop caring what it's called.

<-- Mad that he ever got rid of his 328i.
 

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
Originally posted by: SammyBoy
The top o the line was the 328 at the time, and i guess they didn't think bottom of the line (325) sounded different enough from the best engine available (328), so they called it the 323.

When the 3 liter 6 came around they called it by its normal displacement name, the 325

You are correct.
 

DivideBYZero

Lifer
May 18, 2001
24,117
2
0
...and the 316 is a 1.8l. :confused:

They keep the names because ever since the mk1 3's they have had 316's, 320's and 323's.

It's a tradition thing and only a few of the line have the capacity in the number correct.
 

LordUnum

Golden Member
Jul 3, 2001
1,153
0
0
Originally posted by: SammyBoy
The top o the line was the 328 at the time, and i guess they didn't think bottom of the line (325) sounded different enough from the best engine available (328), so they called it the 323.

When the 3 liter 6 came around they called it by its normal displacement name, the 325
Yes, I believe you're right. But just to make sure... <steps outside and pops open hood>

Yup, it's a 2.5L... and it needs bigger wheels. :p