Why is the Ford-Edsel 390 so weak?

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

EightySix Four

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2004
5,122
52
91
It's also the crank layout. IIRC most BMW V8 engines use a flat-plane crank while most US V8 engines use a cross-plane crank. This causes quite a bit of difference in how the engines sound.

ZV

I said it once before, and I'll say it again... the current M3's V8 uses a cross-plane crank.

exploded-789-big.jpg


Now, look at the crankshaft. Compare the farthest one on the right to the one next to it. Those are not on the same plane.
 
Last edited:

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Does anyone know if it's possible to install a frame chassis in, say an old 60's mustang? They're unibody construction, and I don't think that is so hot.

What sort of chassis does the M3 use?
 

EightySix Four

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2004
5,122
52
91
Does anyone know if it's possible to install a frame chassis in, say an old 60's mustang? They're unibody construction, and I don't think that is so hot.

What sort of chassis does the M3 use?

Here we go again lol.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Does anyone know if it's possible to install a frame chassis in, say an old 60's mustang? They're unibody construction, and I don't think that is so hot.

What sort of chassis does the M3 use?


Unibody with front struts and double wishbone rear, same as IRS equipped Mustangs or pretty much most all cars on the road.

Mustangs (and 3 series to my knowledge) have always been unibody since birth.

What's not hot about it? It's lighter, more rigid, and stronger.
 
Last edited:

Zenmervolt

Elite member
Oct 22, 2000
24,514
36
91
I said it once before, and I'll say it again... the current M3's V8 uses a cross-plane crank.

exploded-789-big.jpg


Now, look at the crankshaft. Compare the farthest one on the right to the one next to it. Those are not on the same plane.

This is why I said, "IIRC" and, "most". ;) I tend to associate flat-plane V8 engines with European manufacturers, but it's been a long time since I actually looked into the specs of one.

ZV
 

EightySix Four

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2004
5,122
52
91
This is why I said, "IIRC" and, "most". ;) I tend to associate flat-plane V8 engines with European manufacturers, but it's been a long time since I actually looked into the specs of one.

ZV

It's rare I get a chance to give you a hard time, had to take it :p

AFAIK, very few manufacturers run flat plane anymore. The majority of those manufacturers being exotics such as Ferrari. Lamborghini has no V8 car right now, TVR is dead, Maserati uses cross plane cranks in Ferrari motors... I can't think of any other exotic manufacturers that do their design in house...

Racing engines are a different story. Audi got into a lot of trouble at one point for saying that a their flat plane crank race car only had a "twisted" crank from a street car thus it still fit the spec series. Lol
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
It's rare I get a chance to give you a hard time, had to take it :p

AFAIK, very few manufacturers run flat plane anymore. The majority of those manufacturers being exotics such as Ferrari. Lamborghini has no V8 car right now, TVR is dead, Maserati uses cross plane cranks in Ferrari motors... I can't think of any other exotic manufacturers that do their design in house...

Racing engines are a different story. Audi got into a lot of trouble at one point for saying that a their flat plane crank race car only had a "twisted" crank from a street car thus it still fit the spec series. Lol

Top Fuelers once experimented with flat cranks but stopped because they had what was described as "a wicked vibration". If you watch top fuelers warming up, you'll start to wonder how bad the vibration is that they would call it wicked. But I'm guessing that they did some recent tests of flat plane cranks in top fuel engines in Haiti, Chile, and Mexicali.
 

EightySix Four

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2004
5,122
52
91
Top Fuelers once experimented with flat cranks but stopped because they had what was described as "a wicked vibration". If you watch top fuelers warming up, you'll start to wonder how bad the vibration is that they would call it wicked. But I'm guessing that they did some recent tests of flat plane cranks in top fuel engines in Haiti, Chile, and Mexicali.

Well the gist of it is you are going from 4 v-twins to 2 I4's. I4's aren't exactly known for being vibration free without heavy balancing weights, which I would assume you'd avoid in top fuel.
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Here we go again lol.

I'm just curious lol, I'm not trying to stir up trouble, just get answers, that's all. :)

Unibody with front struts and double wishbone rear, same as IRS equipped Mustangs or pretty much most all cars on the road.

Mustangs (and 3 series to my knowledge) have always been unibody since birth.

What's not hot about it? It's lighter, more rigid, and stronger.


Oh, I thought it would flex a lot more, but I guess you're right. I saw a Corvette chassis as well, and it actually looks like it's a unibody constructed car as well.

I guess I just don't feel comfortable with the idea of a bolt on suspension--I have experienced personally their weakness, but I'm not sure what holds the M3's IRS in place, i.e. how many brackets etc.
 

EightySix Four

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2004
5,122
52
91
I'm just curious lol, I'm not trying to stir up trouble, just get answers, that's all. :)




Oh, I thought it would flex a lot more, but I guess you're right. I saw a Corvette chassis as well, and it actually looks like it's a unibody constructed car as well.

I guess I just don't feel comfortable with the idea of a bolt on suspension--I have experienced personally their weakness, but I'm not sure what holds the M3's IRS in place, i.e. how many brackets etc.

Unibody Solstice

chassis.jpg
 

EightySix Four

Diamond Member
Jul 17, 2004
5,122
52
91
Interestingly TehMac, the Sky Redline/Solstice GXP are very close in size/weight to the early Mustangs except for length. Stretch one of those frames and push it under a mustang body ;)
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Doesn't dynacorn offer some sort of chassis for '60's muscle car classics? I think so...

I can't imagine a pontiac solstice being any good...
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Oh I wasn't aware enthusiasts enjoyed that car. Interesting. What I'd like to do to an old gutted mustang is install high grade aluminum frames like what the corvette has and so forth. One thing I was wondering about them was how they make an aluminum frame stronger
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Generally the people that do that go for a tube frame+cage with chro-moloy steel, and basically forget about considering their car a street car.
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Generally the people that do that go for a tube frame+cage with chro-moloy steel, and basically forget about considering their car a street car.

Well, I'd forget the cage. I'm not a race car driver... lol
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
The cage is usually part of the framework and provides rigidity.
OrtizMustang2.jpg


...and that is a "Mustang".
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
The cage is usually part of the framework and provides rigidity.
OrtizMustang2.jpg


...and that is a "Mustang".

Well, the roll cage is pretty explicit, it doesn't look like it's going to be tucked away under the shell or body panels, and it's obstructing entry way into the car.

It also looks like this car is a drag race with probably 700-1000 hp, so I imagine such rigidity would be needed for proper power transfer.
 

exdeath

Lifer
Jan 29, 2004
13,679
10
81
Well, the roll cage is pretty explicit, it doesn't look like it's going to be tucked away under the shell or body panels, and it's obstructing entry way into the car.

It also looks like this car is a drag race with probably 700-1000 hp, so I imagine such rigidity would be needed for proper power transfer.

Try 2000+ HP. That's probably going to be a 6-7 second class outlaw car. Look at the size of that water-air intercooler and the piping, that thing will probable have 500+ cubes and a 100mm+ single turbo at 30+ psi.
 
Last edited: