What are those?
/and it should be "A persons natural rights"
//for the PC crowd...
Life, liberty and property. I'm a follower of Locke.
I do not think anyone should be forced to pay for another, that is why I have qualms about universal health care, and even public education. I temper that, however, with the knowledge that one needs access to a doctor and education to be able to live, be free and have property.
Health care has really only mattered for about 100 or so years, its a relatively modern invention. Yes, doctors existed before, but not in the sense they do now, they were quacks and charlatans. Today, one cannot exist productively in society without access to health care. I was born with a pre-existing condition, and because of that, I'd have to pay more for health insurance, just so I could afford health care. That is pretty messed up, seeing as I'm generally healthy in all other ways. In order to fix my broken arm, I have to pay more, because I have asthma. Does that sound like a rational system?
I actually believe that if the government took it on itself to provide healthcare, that would make people less dependent, overall, on the gov for its life. It would allow people to live life as they see fit, without fear of death, or undue financial burden.