Common or not what is the point of an AR-15? Really. I dont hate on guns but what is the need of a military grade gun for non-military use? Other than the fact the "constitution" says we can?
WOW, you can't even get this, these are people who follow me through my posts, not threads i post, they find me and start their bullsheit about posts that i previously made that i have qualified OVER A YEAR AGO and expected to end then.
DO you claim that i do the same towards you? Or have i much like anyone only actually been in SOME threads created BY YOU, you retarded little troll?
Well there you go, and now shut the fuck up.
Get the fuck out of here. You're a troll and a liar. You should be imprisoned for impersonating war heroes. Congratulations on completely ruining a thread.
Why do we keep making ridiculous comparisons like these? Until people are using swimming pools as murder weapons it's not going to be heavily regulated.
Radiation poisoning deaths are not common, yet we make sure there are tons of safety nets in place and regulations so you don't walk into glowing uranium rod.
Clearly having 100x the amount of homicides per capita due to gun violence isn't enough?
Accidents will happen, indeed, homicides are NOT accidents.
Do you believe, honestly, that the extreme amount of homicides per year in the US due to gun violence has nothing to do with the legal availability of guns?
Look, you know i think you're a good guy and an intelligent man but the excuse for intentional homicide due to the availability of guns is NOT diminished by the drowning accidents.
Since i know you're an intelligent man, i know you already know that which makes me question your approach.
You should tell me to piss off because i'm not a yank. That would help your case just as much.
i don't get this militar proudness, it's just a job... that no one really want's to do
You wouldn't understand.
So, we want to hire armed guards for schools. We want to put in metal detectors. And so on. First, Columbine had an armed resource officer. He was in his car, eating lunch, watching an area where the kids go to smoke. He was fired upon within 5 minutes of the shooting starting at the school & was completely ineffective in stopping anything from happening. If you look at the amount of preparation that Klebold & Harris did (distractionary timed bombs off campus), I don't think it's outside the realm of reality that they accounted for his lunch time. Connecticut: locked doors. These things did nothing to prevent tragedies. Meanwhile, all the deaths from school shootings combined since Columbine still don't add up to the number of people struck annually by lightning. How many schools have lightning detectors for their sporting events to detect lightning in the area? An under $200 device that could be more effective at preventing deaths than anything suggested after this event by people using emotion vs. statistical reasoning.
Everything about this discussion is emotional. So many people fail to look at things rationally as you've done. The odds of being blown up on a plane by a terrorist is incredibly small but we Americans choose to spend tens of billions of dollars a year to be groped by a minimum wage employee. Americans are simply bad at math and logic.
Common or not what is the point of a sports car? Really. I dont hate on cars but what is the need of a racing grade car for non-speeding use? Other than the fact the "Top Gear guys" say we can?
Common or not what is the point of an AR-15? Really. I dont hate on guns but what is the need of a military grade gun for non-military use? Other than the fact the "constitution" says we can?
Except it's not a military grade gun. Aside from the appearance it isn't any different than any other semi-auto rifle on the market in terms of capability.
Those who are asking why someone should be allowed to have a rifle like an AR-15 are missing the point entirely.
Yep. I am not aware of any military using the AR-15 as their "assault weapon", or as any weapon. They will using something whose model starts with an M most likely, or one from another country all together. The AR-15 is closer to a Ruger Mini14 than any true military grade assault weapon.
But OMG they are black and scary looking and stuff!!
Eh, pretty much everyone in the military that has an m4 or m16 uses single shots firing semi-auto. Semi-auto fire is more effective in most situations, and if you look at it like that my ar15 is pretty much identical to my m4 that I use to carry. Three round burst is a great way to run out of ammo real quick.
Common or not what is the point of an AR-15? Really. I dont hate on guns but what is the need of a military grade gun for non-military use? Other than the fact the "constitution" says we can?
Substitute any other right guaranteed to us and see if you still fell that way.Common or not what is the point of an AR-15? Really. I dont hate on guns but what is the need of a military grade gun for non-military use? Other than the fact the "constitution" says we can?
Except it's not a military grade gun. Aside from the appearance it isn't any different than any other semi-auto rifle on the market in terms of capability.
Yep. I am not aware of any military using the AR-15 as their "assault weapon", or as any weapon. They will using something whose model starts with an M most likely, or one from another country all together. The AR-15 is closer to a Ruger Mini14 than any true military grade assault weapon.
But OMG they are black and scary looking and stuff!!
oh, no, please....
i beg you to explain why i should call a guy a hero, for doing its job
Yep. I am not aware of any military using the AR-15 as their "assault weapon", or as any weapon. They will using something whose model starts with an M most likely, or one from another country all together. The AR-15 is closer to a Ruger Mini14 than any true military grade assault weapon.
But OMG they are black and scary looking and stuff!!

 
				
		