Why is a repost so bad???

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
If you post something of interest, chances are that there are A LOT of people who haven't seen it, even if it has been posted before.

Yet, there seems to be a relatively small number of population who love to be REPOST!!! nazis, as if every time they scream it, they get another notch in their belt. Do you guys get a bonus if you happen to be the first one to notice? What about the 20th guy in the thread who screams it.... How pathetic is he (because we didn't get it, the first 19 times "REPOST" was said.)

There have been more incidents than not, where something is a REPOST, yet I have never seen it. And although I may find the topic very interesting, it's not something I would've searched for.

So, without the dreaded REPOST, I would probably not have seen the topic.

What's so bad about posting something again, especially if it's been a while? (And don't give me bandwidth, as a reason. There are so many more bandwidth robbing replies around here that are incredibly more useless.)

:sun:

 

Dacalo

Diamond Member
Mar 31, 2000
8,778
4
76
well, some people just don't search though

but I agree with you to some extent
 

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
Ah yes... It's a thing of beauty when a brain trust can gather, where each member can post one letter of a six letter word.

Actually, that was clever... When it was done about a thousand times ago.
rolleye.gif
 

DanTMWTMP

Lifer
Oct 7, 2001
15,908
19
81
ahahahha...well, since i don't "live" in these forums....i miss a lot of things...and most of the reposts i come across...they're my first time looking @ them..
 

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
ahahahha...well, since i don't "live" in these forums....i miss a lot of things...and most of the reposts i come across...they're my first time looking @ them..
Actually, I do have an idea of why people do it.

It's a superiority thing. By screaming REPOST, it's very similar to my 8-yr boy pointing out that he already knows something that my 5-yr old just learned.
Originally posted by: Cycad
T

haha someone screwed up.
So much for the brain trust. :p


 

BillyGoat

Senior member
Dec 29, 1999
430
0
71
some people have no life and get pleasure outa belittleing someone who hasnt read the forums 24/7
 

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
Originally posted by: Dacalo
well, some people just don't search though

but I agree with you to some extent
Ok, but had that person searched, realized that the story was posted x number of weeks ago, and then decided not to post it, I (and MANY others) would've missed out on the article (or whatever.)

I don't see what the harm is.
 

Wingznut

Elite Member
Dec 28, 1999
16,968
2
0
Originally posted by: BillyGoat0
some people have no life and get pleasure outa belittleing someone who hasnt read the forums 24/7
Yep, I believe that to be true.

 

atom

Diamond Member
Oct 18, 1999
4,722
1
0
It's funny that when a lot of the repost nazi's make their own threads on this forum, they don't bother to title it correctly. IF YOU TITLE YOUR DAMN THREADS CORRECTLY MAYBE IT WOULD BE FOUND IN A SEARCH AND PEOPLE WOULDN'T REPOST.
 

Vic

Elite Member
Jun 12, 2001
50,422
14,337
136
Originally posted by: Adul
repost is the code word for post++ ;)
It is indeed. Posting "Repost!" without providing a link to the original post is just another way of senseless annoying neffing. My favorite repost of all time is when an idiot posted repost in the original thread and I caught him on it.
 

conjur

No Lifer
Jun 7, 2001
58,686
3
0
Originally posted by: atom
It's funny that when a lot of the repost nazi's make their own threads on this forum, they don't bother to title it correctly. IF YOU TITLE YOUR DAMN THREADS CORRECTLY MAYBE IT WOULD BE FOUND IN A SEARCH AND PEOPLE WOULDN'T REPOST.

That and non-subscribers cannot do full-text searches.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: Wingznut
Originally posted by: Dacalo
well, some people just don't search though

but I agree with you to some extent
Ok, but had that person searched, realized that the story was posted x number of weeks ago, and then decided not to post it, I (and MANY others) would've missed out on the article (or whatever.)

I don't see what the harm is.
Why not just bump the old thread unless the old comments no longer apply for some reason?

For example, you could have searched, found and bumped one of the existing anti-Repost-nazi threads ;)

<-- search nazi NOT repost nazi :)