Hmmmm what's being implied here????? Well it appears that what's being implied there is that Linux and a windowing system can be less bloated then MS Windows.Originally posted by: martind1
so what exactly was being implied here then.Originally posted by: thorin
Again I haven't suggested that people shouldn't use MS Bloatware. I simply think MS could follow some better design/implementation practices.Originally posted by: buleyb
So Thorin, considering you seem rather pissed about microsoft software, what do you suggest as an alternative to Microsofts feature laden bloatware?
If you need an alternative consider any version of Linux with any windowing system and/or wine.
Is that a simple enough summary for you?
Also you were trying to make some point earlier about porting code between *Nix's, code is extremely easily ported between them.....so what?
Thorin
