JSt0rm
Lifer
- Sep 5, 2000
- 27,399
- 3,947
- 126
And I see Denmark as a country where people wear silver skates and rely on windmills, but we could both be wrong.
If true, that would be the best country ever.
And I see Denmark as a country where people wear silver skates and rely on windmills, but we could both be wrong.
We are bombing the hell out of Libya but seem to be ignoring Syria. Meanwhile at least 1000 people have been killed by the Syrian regime since the protests started.
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/syria/index.html
Can someone please explain to me the logic behind helping the people of Libya but not the people of Syria?
Removing the Syrian regime would do so much more for us geopolitically. Libya was pretty much minding their own business and hasn't done much on the world stage in years.
Syria on the other hand is still causing all kinds of problems in the middle east. Their leadership killed the leader of Lebanon. They prop up Hezbollah and provide weapons to them. And after years of silence on their border with Israel they are now paying people to protest and storm the border resulting in the death of a dozen or more people.
So can someone please explain to me why Obama is silent on the whole Syrian thing?
Was listening to NPR and regime is taking young children of dissidents and torturing them to death and leaving them on parents front door step as a warning to others. When dealing with scum like that there is no winning other than outside help. Problem with outside help is you have to kill a lot to save a few which creates a whole new set of enemies.
I guarantee some Iraqis or Libyans will remember their parents or children being blown up by American bombs and will spend every waking hour plotting revenge we don't need to add a bunch of Syrians to our enemies list.
regime is taking young children of dissidents and torturing them to death and leaving them on parents front door step as a warning to others.
What is so great about saying you believe in nothing?
We're not doing anything in Syria because 5 fucking wars at the same time is a little much. We'll stick to 4.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/world/middleeast/09intel.html?_r=1&hp
This fucking shit is getting out of control.
I've been around longer than you like when I was 10 i remember hama massacre...when you wipe out a whole town has a way of putting damper on revolutionaries. This regime is not above that.
LOL!
Maybe because Syria actually has a military that would put up a fight?
__________________
I've been around longer than you like when I was 10 i remember hama massacre...when you wipe out a whole town has a way of putting damper on revolutionaries. This regime is not above that.
It's a new generation of Arabs, Persians, and Muslims, that are attacking the old Generation, and demanding Freedom of Religion.
Really? The US is in a catch-22 position in regards to Syria or any other nation in trouble. If US aids Syria, any further reform might be construed as influence from US and can be invalidated by the nationalists. The new established gov't in Syria would then have less of a legitimacy, whether real or perceived, doesn't matter. If US doesn't aid Syria, it would be seen as hypocritical given how much it values human rights and democracy. I propose US doesn't help Syria because it's not the world's police. The UN is for that purpose. Meanwhile, US has problems of its own like stagnant economy, large deficit, and other problems. Why should any priority be given to problems abroad when our own aren't even fixed?To help out our fellow man.
-John