Who will Kamala pick as VP?

Page 28 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

pete6032

Diamond Member
Dec 3, 2010
8,128
3,568
136
Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
What policies, if any, do you feel he has he advanced that are "very liberal" but also disagreeable to the majority of Americans? Most of the "very liberal" policies I'm seeing reflect what most Americans want - legal pot, free school lunch, right to abortion, affordable college for low income, etc.
 

Indus

Lifer
May 11, 2002
15,944
11,103
136
I live in MN. I have seen his policies first hand.

Hey hey you don't even know the dems first hand!

No way Kamala and Walz make it to the election much less the convention. They'll be replaced with Michelle Obama and Gavin Newsom shortly!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: hal2kilo

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,581
46,215
136
Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.)

This is one component of balancing the ticket. They also have different styles and dispositions. Trump picked a far less charismatic mini-me and that has not gone well.

Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all.

I think he's going to have pretty good success at defending his policy choices considering the alternative. This is definitely a strength of how he presents and communicates. He already got everybody to start calling Republicans "weird" to the extent that Trump is now posting about how he is not weird.

Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.

Politicians sometimes revise positions in the light of different electoral circumstances? I mean this is pretty basic.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,581
46,215
136
Harkening back several weeks ago to when these same people claimed that Harris would be easy to beat by painting her as a radical liberal while the party cannon ball dived into the racism/sexism pool.

So yeah you might call me skeptical this is going to work especially when early voting kicks off in a lot of states mid-Oct.

 
  • Haha
Reactions: hal2kilo

biostud

Lifer
Feb 27, 2003
19,911
7,016
136
Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
I thought he just needed to be the likable sidekick that could show how "weird" the Trump/Vance campaign is.
 

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,395
136
He is the right kind of actual Democrat who supports the policies Kamala supports - he's got midwestern dad vibe energy, not a more 'educated snooty coastal elite', or whatever bullshit is that plays so well against Dems - so he is the right messenger. Beshear was the only other one that could have pulled it off. Kamala has already been painted as a California liberal elitist from four years ago, and her poll numbers and fundraising have done nothing but change the game. The communicative vibes of Walz are very very good and again, they come from that midwestern dad vibe, he is the guy you want to have a beer with, since that matters to moderates.

He will be an effective messenger, as pointed out he already came up with the biggest messaging narrative of the campaign so far with the weird bit, and he hasn't even started yet - and he has the skills to combat attacks on him.
 

dainthomas

Lifer
Dec 7, 2004
14,927
3,904
136
Harkening back several weeks ago to when these same people claimed that Harris would be easy to beat by painting her as a radical liberal while the party cannon ball dived into the racism/sexism pool.

So yeah you might call me skeptical this is going to work especially when early voting kicks off in a lot of states mid-Oct.


All his radical liberal policies such as all the wildly popular ones that use taxpayer money to help people, instead of shoveling it into the gaping maw of corporations so they can buy back even more stock and lay off workers.
 

HomerJS

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
39,276
32,768
136
Harkening back several weeks ago to when these same people claimed that Harris would be easy to beat by painting her as a radical liberal while the party cannon ball dived into the racism/sexism pool.

So yeah you might call me skeptical this is going to work especially when early voting kicks off in a lot of states mid-Oct.

God forbid a politician that governs based on the will of the people vs against it.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
13,250
4,031
136
I mean they're not exact clones, but they're both fairly bland "aw shucks" kinda folksy-ish frumpy white dudes that don't immediately address a "shortcoming" of the presidential candidate other than be a male ... and he's someone that almost no one (outside of MN) had heard of until like 3 weeks ago.

I don't dislike him at all, it's just the vibe I get from him
I've only heard Walz once for about 30 seconds, and that's my snap impression also. But I wouldn't mind being wrong about that.


You think not being the genital police will lose votes? I think spending a lot of time thinking of people's genitals is going to cost Republicans votes. That's just a really weird obsession.
Well, that came from someone who just a month ago wrote that he couldn't tell who was a better candidate for POTUS: DJT or Kamala Harris.
 

dank69

Lifer
Oct 6, 2009
37,334
32,928
136
Yes, the party that weirdly knows the age of consent in every state and laws related to interstate travel for sex. Nothing wrong with that group.
Related:
VMC8MDO.jpeg
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,238
14,660
146
This isn’t likely to sit well with many of the veterans.




I don’t know how much truth there is to the story…at this point, I’m not going to side with the “OMG! He chickened out!” side of it…but it doesn’t LOOK good.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,575
13,658
136
This isn’t likely to sit well with many of the veterans.




I don’t know how much truth there is to the story…at this point, I’m not going to side with the “OMG! He chickened out!” side of it…but it doesn’t LOOK good.
A paid letter and the NY Post. Sounds like pretty trashy sources.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,717
11,320
136
This isn’t likely to sit well with many of the veterans.




I don’t know how much truth there is to the story…at this point, I’m not going to side with the “OMG! He chickened out!” side of it…but it doesn’t LOOK good.

Swiftboat wasn't real/true either, and it landed plenty well.
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
66,238
14,660
146
Swiftboat wasn't real/true either, and it landed plenty well.
Exactly.

Keep in mind, the original letter came out in 2018…so while it might be a hit piece, it wasn’t aimed at the possible VP, it was aimed at the possible Minn. governor.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,575
13,658
136
Exactly.

Keep in mind, the original letter came out in 2018…so while it might be a hit piece, it wasn’t aimed at the possible VP, it was aimed at the possible Minn. governor.
If someone served for nearly 20 years, and they were subsequently given orders that they may deploy to Iraq in 2005, 2 years after that shit show started, I wouldn't blame someone for taking the exit. I hear Iraq was really popular in the later Bush years.
 

brycejones

Lifer
Oct 18, 2005
29,840
30,607
136
This isn’t likely to sit well with many of the veterans.




I don’t know how much truth there is to the story…at this point, I’m not going to side with the “OMG! He chickened out!” side of it…but it doesn’t LOOK good.
Can we just remember that Trump called soldiers suckers and losers? That is the point that needs to be hammered time and time again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brainonska511

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,725
6,754
126
Not sure I can support someone who owns guns. It might mean he believes that if some suicidal self hating maniac abandoned as a child by an uncaring and profoundly ignorant world, both spiritually and psychologically not to mention scientifically, should by chance target you or a loved one as a vicarious target to blame for all their suffering and rage, that you might have some increased chance to prevent such a tragedy by practicing self defense, that inborn sense of preservation of life that has driven evolution for billions of years, by using a tool called a gun. Heaven forbid.
 

Stokely

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,281
3,085
136
Swiftboat wasn't real/true either, and it landed plenty well.

Which basically tells you that Republicans will say anything, true or false, and it might or not be believed.

As as said just above, if veterans and military vote Cadet "Heel Spurs" Trump after he's shit all over them multiple times, on camera, then they aren't going to vote for you anyway.

Hopefully the Harris campaign vetted very well, because all you can hope to do is present the truth and hope it matters. The GOP will certainly make shit up if it doesn't exist, their supporters don't care which it is.