Who will Kamala pick as VP?

Page 27 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Stokely

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,281
3,085
136
You sure about that?

Trump seemed remarkably healed for having a 2cm wound to his ear…about 3/4”. Unbelievably miraculous, even.

Sure? No, but then I'm not much for conspiracy nonsense. Don't really care either way about his ear at this point. Mainly glad that it doesn't seem to have helped him much.

The point remains that we are always one shot away from the VP. We've had "real" assassinations in the past. Granted, the chance is pretty low (4 out of 45 people have been killed in office)...but now we have a fair number of people owning assault and other rifles, not to mention drones...

You vote Trump, you are also voting for President Vance. Same for President Walz or whoever is picked.
 
Last edited:

Stokely

Platinum Member
Jun 5, 2017
2,281
3,085
136
I really hope he lets out a "The bums will always lose, Trump! The bums will always lose!"
 

RalphTheCow

Senior member
Sep 14, 2000
982
398
136
I guess being the same age should help them relate. Bashear or Shapiro or Buttigeg might have been like working with her son.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,717
11,320
136
This describes basically every VP pick ever. Not like I had any clue who the hell Senator Joe Biden was in 2008.

Biden had been a name/known entity in politics for 30+ years at that point. Same w/Cheney in '00. If you didn't know who they were, you were young or weren't paying attention.
 

Pens1566

Lifer
Oct 11, 2005
13,717
11,320
136
The fact some people think we need to appeal to the worst of the rural voters is just mind-bogglingly weird. It makes zero sense logically or strategically.

This election is going to be won by turnout, by motivating the entire Democratic base and party, and moderates and independents, and also Never Trumers and double haters. Harris/Walz is that ticket. This election is not going to be won by trying to appeal to the already far far gone rural people. No way in hell. I'm sure an east-ish coast liberal Jew lawyer would really win them over too.

Anyways, now that that has been debunked, let's move on.

Biden won in '20 because he did better in the "T" in PA (and similar areas of MI/WI) with rural voters than Clinton did in '16. Which is the same area(s) that Harris will struggle in demographically.
 

Dave_5k

Platinum Member
May 23, 2017
2,007
3,820
136
As far as voters at large outside their home states having any idea who they are he is.
Walz was only recognized by ~30% of voters before the announcement as VP, as opposed to a bit under 50% name recognition for Shapiro and Kelly. They are all not well known - but Walz was definitely less known.

Edit: similar poll a week prior showed Beshear at almost exactly the same 30% name recognition as Walz. Buttigieg wasn't on either poll, but separate poll showed over 80% name recognition as by far the most well known of the VP candidates.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
52,581
46,215
136
Walz was only recognized by ~30% of voters before the announcement as VP, as opposed to a bit under 50% name recognition for Shapiro and Kelly. They are all not well known - but Walz was definitely less known.

Likely a result of leading the veepstakes for a couple weeks and being broadly talked about by the national press. Walz was something of a dark horse and less covered by the mainstream.

Edit for your edit: Buttigieg is a bit different since he was a primary candidate in 2020 and ever since has been a prominent surrogate. Nobody else on the VP shortlists was.
 
Last edited:

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,308
1,692
136
The fact some people think we need to appeal to the worst of the rural voters is just mind-bogglingly weird. It makes zero sense logically or strategically.

This election is going to be won by turnout, by motivating the entire Democratic base and party, and moderates and independents, and also Never Trumers and double haters. Harris/Walz is that ticket. This election is not going to be won by trying to appeal to the already far far gone rural people. No way in hell. I'm sure an east-ish coast liberal Jew lawyer would really win them over too.

Anyways, now that that has been debunked, let's move on.
Dont be so smug and self assured. We will only see what is "debunked" when the election is over.
 

ondma

Diamond Member
Mar 18, 2018
3,308
1,692
136
Ticket balancing is good actually:

View attachment 104589
Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
 
Dec 10, 2005
28,575
13,658
136
Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
Yes, those awful liberal politics of (checks notes) getting kids fed with school lunches and permitting reform (ie, cutting red tape) to speed up green energy deployment.
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
26,012
12,259
136
Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
I so shocked with all your advanced info and all.