evident
Lifer
- Apr 5, 2005
- 12,130
- 749
- 126
Yep it's reverse DEII think the party wanted a middle-aged white man to shore up the middle-aged white voter base, as bad as that sounds.
Yep it's reverse DEII think the party wanted a middle-aged white man to shore up the middle-aged white voter base, as bad as that sounds.
You sure about that?Hell Trump just about got wasted not long ago.
You sure about that?
Trump seemed remarkably healed for having a 2cm wound to his ear…about 3/4”. Unbelievably miraculous, even.
This describes basically every VP pick ever. Not like I had any clue who the hell Senator Joe Biden was in 2008.
That's why I keep saying she/they have to get to the Urban areas. They have enough people to take the state in spite of the rural areas.Walz is somebody who can likely help run up D numbers in the cities and suburbs, where most voters exist.
Biden had been a name/known entity in politics for 30+ years at that point. Same w/Cheney in '00. If you didn't know who they were, you were young or weren't paying attention.
The fact some people think we need to appeal to the worst of the rural voters is just mind-bogglingly weird. It makes zero sense logically or strategically.
This election is going to be won by turnout, by motivating the entire Democratic base and party, and moderates and independents, and also Never Trumers and double haters. Harris/Walz is that ticket. This election is not going to be won by trying to appeal to the already far far gone rural people. No way in hell. I'm sure an east-ish coast liberal Jew lawyer would really win them over too.
Anyways, now that that has been debunked, let's move on.
Most people cannot name the senators of their own state let alone Delaware.
That's great, but it's not the same as saying Walz is on the same level as other picks were.
Lol, ok.As far as voters at large outside their home states having any idea who they are he is.
Walz was only recognized by ~30% of voters before the announcement as VP, as opposed to a bit under 50% name recognition for Shapiro and Kelly. They are all not well known - but Walz was definitely less known.As far as voters at large outside their home states having any idea who they are he is.
Walz was only recognized by ~30% of voters before the announcement as VP, as opposed to a bit under 50% name recognition for Shapiro and Kelly. They are all not well known - but Walz was definitely less known.
Yes, the party that weirdly knows the age of consent in every state and laws related to interstate travel for sex. Nothing wrong with that group.
Dont be so smug and self assured. We will only see what is "debunked" when the election is over.The fact some people think we need to appeal to the worst of the rural voters is just mind-bogglingly weird. It makes zero sense logically or strategically.
This election is going to be won by turnout, by motivating the entire Democratic base and party, and moderates and independents, and also Never Trumers and double haters. Harris/Walz is that ticket. This election is not going to be won by trying to appeal to the already far far gone rural people. No way in hell. I'm sure an east-ish coast liberal Jew lawyer would really win them over too.
Anyways, now that that has been debunked, let's move on.
nvmI didn't really know squat about Waltz. A friend sent me this. That guy is REAL! Excellent choice, madame!
Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
Yes, those awful liberal politics of (checks notes) getting kids fed with school lunches and permitting reform (ie, cutting red tape) to speed up green energy deployment.Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
I so shocked with all your advanced info and all.Exactly. Walz doesnt balance the ticket at all except being white and male (which all the VP candidates were.) Politically he has become very liberal, and doesn't balance the ticket vs Kamala at all. Of course since his politics seem sort of "flexible" (like the other VP nominee) perhaps he will shift back to a more moderate stance.
I live in MN. I have seen his policies first hand.I so shocked with all your advanced info and all.