White House to Push Gun Control

Page 14 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
You know not of what you speak moron.



I am NOT a christian, and I do not take any of my morality from the bible reading it is a waste of toilet paper.


one does not have to be a christian to follow the moral code found in the bible... most of the laws in our country and yours are based on its teachings.
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
So how does the federal government plan to keep track of who is receiving treatment for mental disease? Are doctors going to be required to send a notice of mental treatment to some federal agency like the department of homeland security?

Licensing of doctors is a states right issue.
 
Last edited:

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
We would save FAR more lives, especially lives of children, if we banned bathtubs. Would someone please think of the children!!

Bathtubs != Weapons.

Bathtubs != Guns

Bathtubs were not designed to kill

Bathtubs were meant for another purpose other than death

Next?
 

piasabird

Lifer
Feb 6, 2002
17,168
60
91
How about federal legislation that cuts off the federal funding for any municipality that limts the free sale and ownership of weapons????

Cities like Chicago should have all their federal funding yanked.
 

nick1985

Lifer
Dec 29, 2002
27,153
6
81
What are the idiot statements about bath tubs?

guns11.JPG
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
If this law only bans 30 round mags for pistols I wouldn't care too much. 30 round mags in pistols are innefective and jam prone. Its the fact that they will also attack rifle mags that pisses me off.


Does that piss you off too? Or do you not give a fuck since its not your bull being gored?

112th CONGRESS 1st Session H. R. 308
To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 18, 2011

Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York (for herself, Mr. CLAY, Ms. NORTON, Mr. WEINER, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. ISRAEL, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. MORAN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. HARMAN, Mr. PASCRELL, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. NADLER, Ms. EDWARDS, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Ms. MATSUI, Ms. WATERS, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. CHU, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. HOLT, Mr. CONNOLLY of Virginia, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. QUIGLEY, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. HIMES, Mr. HONDA, Mr. LANGEVIN, Ms. SPEIER, Mr. COHEN, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. FARR, Mr. YARMUTH, Ms. JACKSON LEE of Texas, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BISHOP of New York, and Ms. DEGETTE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.

  • Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.


  • This Act may be cited as the `Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act'.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.


  • (a) Definition- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:

    • `(30) The term `large capacity ammunition feeding device'--

      • `(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but

      • `(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.'.

  • (b) Prohibitions- Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:

  • `(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

  • `(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.

  • `(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.

  • `(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--

    • `(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);

    • `(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;

    • `(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or

    • `(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.'.

  • (c) Penalties- Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:

  • `(8) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.'.

  • (d) Identification Markings- Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: `A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.'.
Here's the current bill. Looks like .22LR lever actions are good to go though. Funny thing is they grandfathered the millions of 30rd+ mags that are already here, lol stupid progressives.
 
Last edited:

Kirby

Lifer
Apr 10, 2006
12,028
2
0
Call me heartless, but I wouldn't care if 85% of children and puppies died of accidental gun deaths, "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" is pretty goddamn clear.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
And how exactly does someone prove or disprove that they had the magazine on or before the date of the bill?

Beats me, though if a manufacturer gets caught making mags without serial numbers after the bill, which is never going to pass but hypothetically, they would be fined/jailed/both.

OR

It will fall on the owner of the magazine to prove they were made before the ban, which is of course guilty until proven innocent, and will not fly. The whole bill is retarded emo driven progressive dribble.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Your opinion on gun control doesn't matter when it comes to the US Constitution and US law. We don't care how you Brits feel about our laws.

YOU Don't care, doesn't mean my opinion doesn't matter, I don't give a shit if you don't care, I don't care what you think.
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
YOU Don't care, doesn't mean my opinion doesn't matter, I don't give a shit if you don't care, I don't care what you think.

Your opinion doesn't matter ...at all. You don't live here, you don't vote here, you don't matter here.
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76

My opinion does matter, just like the opinion of the rest of the world matters when it comes to how countries are governed, Otherwise the opinion of America doesn't matter when talking about anywhere else, like Iraq for example. :whiste:
 

xj0hnx

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2007
9,262
3
76
My opinion does matter, just like the opinion of the rest of the world matters when it comes to how countries are governed, Otherwise the opinion of America doesn't matter when talking about anywhere else, like Iraq for example. :whiste:

No, your opinion doesn't matter in the least when we are discussing American guns laws, not even a little bit.
 

Londo_Jowo

Lifer
Jan 31, 2010
17,303
158
106
londojowo.hypermart.net
My opinion does matter, just like the opinion of the rest of the world matters when it comes to how countries are governed, Otherwise the opinion of America doesn't matter when talking about anywhere else, like Iraq for example. :whiste:

Your opinion matters to you, I'm sure my Senators and Congressman don't give a shit about your opinion on US gun laws. They all support the 2nd amendment of the US Constitution.
 

sao123

Lifer
May 27, 2002
12,653
205
106
No, one has to be deluded to follow the bible.

Deluded? Really?


So if one follows these morals found in the bible, they must be deluded:

Do unto others as you wish them to do unto you.
Do not rape or murder.
Do not lie.
Do not steal or trade dishonestly.
Be content, do not be jealous of what your neighbor has.
Honor your father and mother.
Work hard 6 days and rest the 7th.
fogive those who wrong you, and do not hold grudges.
Care for the sick and poor.
Pay your taxes willingly.




Guess were all horrible people for following these morals.
 

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
Here's the current bill. Looks like .22LR lever actions are good to go though. Funny thing is they grandfathered the millions of 30rd+ mags that are already here, lol stupid progressives.

Thankfully it isn't going anywhere. The fact that it's McCarthy alone will put every Republican in the house against it.
 

alkemyst

No Lifer
Feb 13, 2001
83,769
19
81
Deluded? Really?


So if one follows these morals found in the bible, they must be deluded:

Do unto others as you wish them to do unto you.
Do not rape or murder.
Do not lie.
Do not steal or trade dishonestly.
Be content, do not be jealous of what your neighbor has.
Honor your father and mother.
Work hard 6 days and rest the 7th.
fogive those who wrong you, and do not hold grudges.
Care for the sick and poor.
Pay your taxes willingly.




Guess were all horrible people for following these morals.

The unabridged version doesn't quite get most chicks up to ramming height bedside for me.

Today's Bible is nothing like it was written. This can be discussed without even acknowledging there is a God/god(s) or not.
 

SparkyJJO

Lifer
May 16, 2002
13,357
7
81
The unabridged version doesn't quite get most chicks up to ramming height bedside for me.

Today's Bible is nothing like it was written. This can be discussed without even acknowledging there is a God/god(s) or not.

You're right. Today's is in English, not Hebrew and Greek :D
 

HAL9000

Lifer
Oct 17, 2010
22,021
3
76
Deluded? Really?


So if one follows these morals found in the bible, they must be deluded:

Do unto others as you wish them to do unto you.
Do not rape or murder.
Do not lie.
Do not steal or trade dishonestly.
Be content, do not be jealous of what your neighbor has.
Honor your father and mother.
Work hard 6 days and rest the 7th.
fogive those who wrong you, and do not hold grudges.
Care for the sick and poor.
Pay your taxes willingly.




Guess were all horrible people for following these morals.

If one chooses to follow those morals based on a two thousand year old piece of crap based on the existence of a delusion, yes one has to be deluded.

I didn't say that made you a horrible person