• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

White House opposed to Affirmative Action.

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
AA=Racist
Hitler = leftwing

LOL Good god you republicans are perfecting the art of admit to nothing, deny everything, and couter accuse.

Who said Hitler is leftwing?

BTW... I agree that republicans suck. But then again, so do democrates 🙂
 
My family came over from germany in the 30s and they spoke no english. They worked in factories and my dad took out huge loans to put himself through college. Why should I have to pay reparations to slaves when my family wasnt even here during the time of slavery.

And Carbonyl Hitler was far right wing you moron.

Stalin and Marx were left wing. Take a history/political science class.
 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: josphII
Originally posted by: classy
I am so sick of this sh**. What little advantage AA may give to blacks is so F'IN small it doesn't even register on the map. The corporate world is still so white it looks like a snow blown Christmas. Blacks have lagged so far behind whites it aint funny. Not because we aren't qualified either. I am sick of that damn lie too. A black man's credentials many many times have to far exceed his lower qualified white counter part just to get a freaking interview. And what pisses me off even more is this idea that blacks are getting over some how. The truth is many of these admissions programs are bent so Black Athletes who pay the damn bills at these colleges can get in. All you road scholars wouldn't even be able to afford to go to college it would be so high if not for the black athlete. Now thats where the rubber meets the road. So when you start cheering, you better start saving trust me. And I said it before and this I hate to say but I believe, our gifted black athletes should go to black colleges. Since all the white colleges are so affected by AA let them have their own children pay the bills. And if you think that people, even white will pay to see a bunch of white guys play any sport, guess again. I get tired of hearing the college debate cause no one wants to talk about this. Now one wants to talked about how the black players who win bowl games for these schools, that these schools pocket millions of dollars to pay for all the sorry whining kids who can't contribute a damn dime to pay the bills. And if you think for one second Michigan or Notre Dame can survive with just collecting tuition you really are stupid.

thats the biggest bunch of bs ive read in this thread. "not because blacks arent qualified either....A black man's credentials many many times have to far exceed his lower qualified white counter part" dude your living in a dream world. take a look at average SAT scores for example. who do you think scores higher? average gpa, or sat scores of white students compared to blacks? (and i surely am NOT talking about black athletes)

you think sports programs pay for school costs, expenses?? your wrong. thats why tution has skyrocketed over the past two decades. if you were right then $.50 out of every $1 donated to the college of engineering at UC Berkeley wouldnt be going to fund humanities programs!

And why are those white kids tests scores higher? Because thier white parents are more well to do, they have better schools and have more free time to spend with thier kids because they live a more affuent lifestyle. Unless you bring black america to where white america is this trend will continue. AA seeks to do that.

We have'nt even disscussed the punitive damages for 400 years of slavery yet which AA also seeks to pay for.

What about the Native Americans who had to put up with European and American crap for over 600 years? Trail of Tears anyone? Forced relocation? Ethnic cleansing via disease? And I'm sorry, but considering my ancestors had nothing to do with any slavery in America, should I pay for the injustices done to Blacks when they (my ancestors) weren't even in the country? And what happens after the government pays out that money? People go crying for even greater reparations.

Hmm....maybe me and a couple of million other Poles should seek reparations from the Germans and Russians after what they did to our ancestors and their country during WW2 and before that? Maybe we should make anyone living in the Middle Eastern area pay for some punitive damages because they introduced slavery into the world? Then the Egyptians after them, and so on and so on
rolleye.gif
Sense the sarcasm?

In theory, Affirmative Action is a brilliant thing IF it was based on economics. But it's based on race, and it does promote racism. You think its very encouraging for a white male to apply to a medical school knowing he may very well get rejected with his 3.7GPA so a black person can get into the college with a 2.5? Now if it was different, and this black person had maybe a 3.2 GPA, was working to help support his family, and has a decent background, vs. your stereotypical rich white kid, I have no problem with the 3.2 GPA person getting in over the 3.7. Neither would I have a problem if that person was Spanish, Asian, etc. But if he's getting into the school JUST BECAUSE hes black, latin, asian, etc, I most certainly do have a problem with that.
 
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
My family came over from germany in the 30s and they spoke no english. They worked in factories and my dad took out huge loans to put himself through college. Why should I have to pay reparations to slaves when my family wasnt even here during the time of slavery.

And Carbonyl Hitler was far right wing you moron.

Stalin and Marx were left wing. Take a history/political science class.

He was saying that Republicans say that Hitler = Leftwing.
 
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
AA=Racist
Hitler = leftwing

LOL Good god you republicans are perfecting the art of admit to nothing, deny everything, and couter accuse.

Who said Hitler is leftwing?

BTW... I agree that republicans suck. But then again, so do democrates 🙂

This group here has said it in other threads to try and make comparisons to the liberals. It's just as frigen ridiculus to any scholar or text book and intellectually dishonest. Ya I hate dems to I'm a Socialist. But 95% of the people don't know what that is either. Oh well.



 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
AA=Racist
Hitler = leftwing

LOL Good god you republicans are perfecting the art of admit to nothing, deny everything, and couter accuse.

Who said Hitler is leftwing?

BTW... I agree that republicans suck. But then again, so do democrates 🙂

This group here has said it in other threads to try and make comparisons to the liberals. It's just as frigen ridiculus to any scholar or text book and intellectually dishonest. Ya I hate dems to I'm a Socialist. But 95% of the people don't know what that is either. Oh well.

I don't align myself with any party. In terms of "party issues," I agree with Republicans on some, Democrates on some, Socialist, Libertarians, Green, etc. on some.

Probably, overall, I lean a bit to the left of the political spectrum.
 
Originally posted by: BigJ2078
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: josphII
Originally posted by: classy
I am so sick of this sh**. What little advantage AA may give to blacks is so F'IN small it doesn't even register on the map. The corporate world is still so white it looks like a snow blown Christmas. Blacks have lagged so far behind whites it aint funny. Not because we aren't qualified either. I am sick of that damn lie too. A black man's credentials many many times have to far exceed his lower qualified white counter part just to get a freaking interview. And what pisses me off even more is this idea that blacks are getting over some how. The truth is many of these admissions programs are bent so Black Athletes who pay the damn bills at these colleges can get in. All you road scholars wouldn't even be able to afford to go to college it would be so high if not for the black athlete. Now thats where the rubber meets the road. So when you start cheering, you better start saving trust me. And I said it before and this I hate to say but I believe, our gifted black athletes should go to black colleges. Since all the white colleges are so affected by AA let them have their own children pay the bills. And if you think that people, even white will pay to see a bunch of white guys play any sport, guess again. I get tired of hearing the college debate cause no one wants to talk about this. Now one wants to talked about how the black players who win bowl games for these schools, that these schools pocket millions of dollars to pay for all the sorry whining kids who can't contribute a damn dime to pay the bills. And if you think for one second Michigan or Notre Dame can survive with just collecting tuition you really are stupid.

thats the biggest bunch of bs ive read in this thread. "not because blacks arent qualified either....A black man's credentials many many times have to far exceed his lower qualified white counter part" dude your living in a dream world. take a look at average SAT scores for example. who do you think scores higher? average gpa, or sat scores of white students compared to blacks? (and i surely am NOT talking about black athletes)

you think sports programs pay for school costs, expenses?? your wrong. thats why tution has skyrocketed over the past two decades. if you were right then $.50 out of every $1 donated to the college of engineering at UC Berkeley wouldnt be going to fund humanities programs!

And why are those white kids tests scores higher? Because thier white parents are more well to do, they have better schools and have more free time to spend with thier kids because they live a more affuent lifestyle. Unless you bring black america to where white america is this trend will continue. AA seeks to do that.

We have'nt even disscussed the punitive damages for 400 years of slavery yet which AA also seeks to pay for.

What about the Native Americans who had to put up with European and American crap for over 600 years? Trail of Tears anyone? Forced relocation? Ethnic cleansing via disease? And I'm sorry, but considering my ancestors had nothing to do with any slavery in America, should I pay for the injustices done to Blacks when they (my ancestors) weren't even in the country? And what happens after the government pays out that money? People go crying for even greater reparations.

Hmm....maybe me and a couple of million other Poles should seek reparations from the Germans and Russians after what they did to our ancestors and their country during WW2 and before that? Maybe we should make anyone living in the Middle Eastern area pay for some punitive damages because they introduced slavery into the world? Then the Egyptians after them, and so on and so on
rolleye.gif
Sense the sarcasm?

In theory, Affirmative Action is a brilliant thing IF it was based on economics. But it's based on race, and it does promote racism. You think its very encouraging for a white male to apply to a medical school knowing he may very well get rejected with his 3.7GPA so a black person can get into the college with a 2.5? Now if it was different, and this black person had maybe a 3.2 GPA, was working to help support his family, and has a decent background, vs. your stereotypical rich white kid, I have no problem with the 3.2 GPA person getting in over the 3.7. Neither would I have a problem if that person was Spanish, Asian, etc. But if he's getting into the school JUST BECAUSE hes black, latin, asian, etc, I most certainly do have a problem with that.

Uhhh tell me a better way to compensate mass injustice like slavery or holocausts? Just forget about it, get over it? Those victims arnt alive anymore but thier relatives are. Jews even today are recieveing monies from the former NAZIS.

As far as blacks the entire group suffers still today the stigma and discrimmination of being black. Hell just look at classys POV and see why. Compensating modern ancestors for past injustices is justified on the grounds that they are still suffering from the crimes of history. The indians are and should still recieve lands and monies. The white man is still benefiting for thier crimes of theft and murder. Seems fair to me. TANSTAAFL


 
You think its very encouraging for a white male to apply to a medical school knowing he may very well get rejected with his 3.7GPA so a black person can get into the college with a 2.5? Now if it was different, and this black person had maybe a 3.2 GPA, was working to help support his family, and has a decent background, vs. your stereotypical rich white kid, I have no problem with the 3.2 GPA person getting in over the 3.7. Neither would I have a problem if that person was Spanish, Asian, etc. But if he's getting into the school JUST BECAUSE hes black, latin, asian, etc, I most certainly do have a problem with that.

I forgot to address this. First of all any accedited medical school in the US has higher admmision standards than a 2.5. Next is you'all have never shown me proof this practice is accepted and implemented but you do keep saying it. I can believe a black with a 3.5 vs a white with the 3.7 perhaps they would lean the blacks way to address the huge medical Dr shortage in black communites but your numbers are way disproportionate to reality. A whole GPA..Uh huh. Also they consider other factors like economic backgroud and EXCURR activites ect. Actually GPA and MCAT scores are way overrated. It's personality, the benefit you can make, time you can serve in addition to GPA and MCAT...I know subjectivity is infuriating to you but that's the way it's done and should be. You judge peoples performance based on effort and compare it with capabity in the real world to make an assesment of them.
 
Bush went to Yale. Did he get in based on his high school grades, SAT scores, and activities? Nope, he benefited from the Affirmative Action given to the rich and connected. His stand on Affirmative Action is pure hypocrisy.
 
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
My family came over from germany in the 30s and they spoke no english. They worked in factories and my dad took out huge loans to put himself through college. Why should I have to pay reparations to slaves when my family wasnt even here during the time of slavery.

And Carbonyl Hitler was far right wing you moron.

Stalin and Marx were left wing. Take a history/political science class.

He was saying that Republicans say that Hitler = Leftwing.

:Q

Look at it this way goldbricker, you missed out on paying for what your ancestors did over in europe with the Jews, but are still benefiting by being of the same color as those who did it here to the blacks. Pay me now or pay me later.

 
Originally posted by: josphII
Originally posted by: Geekbabe
Well,I've benefitted from AA and I'm certainly a qualified,professional individual who does just as good a job as any male at my place of employment.🙂

now imagine you were a male, and more qualified than a woman that was given the job!

Actually I'm old enough to remember being turned down for jobs that I was better qualified for simply because I wasn't male. Thanks to no fault divorce I also had to be primary breadwinner for 3 kids too,just like a man.
I know what getting screwed out of something you deserve feels like trust me.I will say that AA merely opened a few doors for me,if I hadn't cut the mustard once I got in,you better believe one of the good old boys would very happily have seen to it that I got canned.
 
Yay, first Affirmative Action, now Reparations. Can we somehow fit religion in here and make it a trifecta?

Anyways, AA is a bunch of bs. What you are telling me is that we should be giving breaks to people based on their race. It's almost as if saying that we don't expect them to do as well as the rest of society, so here's a little help. How can you expect equality when you don't expect them to be equal? You are short changing yourselves if you believe that simply because of your skin color, you can't compete on a level playing ground.

Moving on to reparations, that's another load of crap. Why should I have to pay for my ancestors mistakes? Not to mention that my ancestors were Irish immigrants sometime in the latter half of the 19th century and had absolutly nothing to do with it. But hey, I'm white, so everything must be my fault. Maybe if Jesse and the gang spent less time whining about how much the man is keeping them down and more time spent on raising standards, then we wouldn't be having this discussion. But, instead of working to get a better opportunity, it seems that many would rather expect handouts. It's asinine.
 
Originally posted by: Jellomancer
Originally posted by: josphII
Originally posted by: NakaNaka
I'm happy that Bush is standing against Afirmative Action. The problem us AA was developed so when you have two equal candidates and one is a white male with an easy life and another is a minority with a hard one, then the minority would get the position. That is how AA should work. However, what it turned into was a disgustingly less qualified minority candidate getting preference because of their minority status. I'm happy the SC might get rid of AA, though I still believe if you have two equal candidates then the minority (assuming they had a harder life) should get the position. I don't see how anyone can argue against that.

cant argue that?? why in the world should a minority with equal qualifications automatically be given a job over an equally qualified white guy? that makes no sense at all and is a totally racist comment. if two candidates are truely equal in ability to do a particular job then they should stand the same chance to get the job.

Without affirmative action, you know damn well the white guy would have a much better chance of getting the job. That said, affirmative action is bad, even if the reasoning behind it is sound.
The equal achievement or whatever is not working out too well here in Texas though. UT's enrollment is the highest it's ever been, and expected to increase further.

Where I work, about ten years ago. the upper management noticed that all management were white guys and these white guys usually hired and promoted white guys. Yes they did hire some women and "minorities" but no matter how good these people were for some reason they did not go very far in the company. The reason I wrote "minorities" is because whites guys are a minority so the organization did not reflect the US population. Ten years later, the organization more reflects the make up of the US and the company is, in terms of profits, more successful.

 
Originally posted by: classy
Well its been a been a white man's world, so I guess you guys just need more of the world. I am not surprised. This just rings out the true sentiments that lie in the very heart of the Republican Party and the whites who follow them. What I find sad is he waited till Dr King's birthday to announce this bs. He's been in office how long? He could have said this on 364 other days. But just like in the days of Lynching when they hung us out on trees so all could see, he picks the most notable day of the most notable black man in our modern history. Sometimes, days like this make me wish there was an all out race war so we could just settle this once and for all.

You want a race war?

 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
My family came over from germany in the 30s and they spoke no english. They worked in factories and my dad took out huge loans to put himself through college. Why should I have to pay reparations to slaves when my family wasnt even here during the time of slavery.

And Carbonyl Hitler was far right wing you moron.

Stalin and Marx were left wing. Take a history/political science class.

He was saying that Republicans say that Hitler = Leftwing.

:Q

Look at it this way goldbricker, you missed out on paying for what your ancestors did over in europe with the Jews, but are still benefiting by being of the same color as those who did it here to the blacks. Pay me now or pay me later.

Why should I have to pay for something that I didn't do?
 
"It's almost as if saying that we don't expect them to do as well as the rest of society, so here's a little help"

Could it possibly mean we don't expect whites will hire them because historically this has been true and even today is true. Just open your eyes and flip though forbes see if it's reprentative of america. All races and women are very much underrepresented the higher you go up the pole. What causing this? Are white males somehow superior or is it a institutional racism and sexism that needs addressing? AA has at least got some in the door to show thier mettle and now we are seeing progress a little. Now Bush wants it torn down. Not a good idea and we will revert due to human nature.

Edit -human nature is we like people like us in general.
 
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
My family came over from germany in the 30s and they spoke no english. They worked in factories and my dad took out huge loans to put himself through college. Why should I have to pay reparations to slaves when my family wasnt even here during the time of slavery.

And Carbonyl Hitler was far right wing you moron.

Stalin and Marx were left wing. Take a history/political science class.

He was saying that Republicans say that Hitler = Leftwing.

:Q

Look at it this way goldbricker, you missed out on paying for what your ancestors did over in europe with the Jews, but are still benefiting by being of the same color as those who did it here to the blacks. Pay me now or pay me later.

Why should I have to pay for something that I didn't do?



Here is the logic behind it.Text
 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Gobadgrs
My family came over from germany in the 30s and they spoke no english. They worked in factories and my dad took out huge loans to put himself through college. Why should I have to pay reparations to slaves when my family wasnt even here during the time of slavery.

And Carbonyl Hitler was far right wing you moron.

Stalin and Marx were left wing. Take a history/political science class.

He was saying that Republicans say that Hitler = Leftwing.

:Q

Look at it this way goldbricker, you missed out on paying for what your ancestors did over in europe with the Jews, but are still benefiting by being of the same color as those who did it here to the blacks. Pay me now or pay me later.

Why should I have to pay for something that I didn't do?



Here is the logic behind it.Text

I read it, but it still didn't answer the question:

Why should I have to pay for something that I didn't do?
 
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: classy
Well its been a been a white man's world, so I guess you guys just need more of the world. I am not surprised. This just rings out the true sentiments that lie in the very heart of the Republican Party and the whites who follow them. What I find sad is he waited till Dr King's birthday to announce this bs. He's been in office how long? He could have said this on 364 other days. But just like in the days of Lynching when they hung us out on trees so all could see, he picks the most notable day of the most notable black man in our modern history. Sometimes, days like this make me wish there was an all out race war so we could just settle this once and for all.

You want a race war?
Hell, classy, we'd better see you on the front lines.
 
Wow howard I'm surprised you did'nt cap on my spelling and gramme yet. It's been absolutly atrocious in this thread... as I was just re-reading some things.🙂


datalink- We as tax payers pay the 911 victims with the same thoery, does that help?
 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Wow howard I'm surprised you did'nt cap on my spelling and gramme yet. It's been absolutly atrocious in this thread... as I was just re-reading some things.🙂


datalink- We as tax payers pay the 911 victims with the same thoery, does that help?

Well, I don't think that we should pay 911 victems so maybe that explains my view a bit🙂

edit: Let me revise that statement. I don't think they should be paid the huge ammount that they got paid. Only something similar along the lines that those hit by a natural disaster get paid in aid by the government.
 
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Good, maybe then I can enjoy the benefit of being a white male again!

It's already banned in California.

White males are banned in California? I knew this would happen someday.

Actually they just raised the taxes on them to level that the only AFFORDABLE white males are on the black market😉
 
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
Originally posted by: josphII
Originally posted by: classy
I am so sick of this sh**. What little advantage AA may give to blacks is so F'IN small it doesn't even register on the map. The corporate world is still so white it looks like a snow blown Christmas. Blacks have lagged so far behind whites it aint funny. Not because we aren't qualified either. I am sick of that damn lie too. A black man's credentials many many times have to far exceed his lower qualified white counter part just to get a freaking interview. And what pisses me off even more is this idea that blacks are getting over some how. The truth is many of these admissions programs are bent so Black Athletes who pay the damn bills at these colleges can get in. All you road scholars wouldn't even be able to afford to go to college it would be so high if not for the black athlete. Now thats where the rubber meets the road. So when you start cheering, you better start saving trust me. And I said it before and this I hate to say but I believe, our gifted black athletes should go to black colleges. Since all the white colleges are so affected by AA let them have their own children pay the bills. And if you think that people, even white will pay to see a bunch of white guys play any sport, guess again. I get tired of hearing the college debate cause no one wants to talk about this. Now one wants to talked about how the black players who win bowl games for these schools, that these schools pocket millions of dollars to pay for all the sorry whining kids who can't contribute a damn dime to pay the bills. And if you think for one second Michigan or Notre Dame can survive with just collecting tuition you really are stupid.

thats the biggest bunch of bs ive read in this thread. "not because blacks arent qualified either....A black man's credentials many many times have to far exceed his lower qualified white counter part" dude your living in a dream world. take a look at average SAT scores for example. who do you think scores higher? average gpa, or sat scores of white students compared to blacks? (and i surely am NOT talking about black athletes)

you think sports programs pay for school costs, expenses?? your wrong. thats why tution has skyrocketed over the past two decades. if you were right then $.50 out of every $1 donated to the college of engineering at UC Berkeley wouldnt be going to fund humanities programs!

And why are those white kids tests scores higher? Because thier white parents are more well to do, they have better schools and have more free time to spend with thier kids because they live a more affuent lifestyle. Unless you bring black america to where white america is this trend will continue. AA seeks to do that.

We have'nt even disscussed the punitive damages for 400 years of slavery yet which AA also seeks to pay for.

400 Years:Q considering that the America wasn't even inhabited by europeans 400 years ago (the mayflower arrived in 1620) I think you may be a little off in your math.

Reperations are not legal as you can not hold someone responsible for commiting a LEGAL ACT by changing the law and when they comply charge them for commiting that crime BEFORE IT WAS ILLEGAL. We have a document called the constitution and in section 9 it reads "No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed".

This would be like raising the minimum wage and then sueing everyone who was paying the minimum wage before it got raised. It is my belief that slavery is a black Eye that this country had but taking away the rights of other's will never right the wrong.
 
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: bunker
Originally posted by: rbloedow
If he persues this argument more, maybe he can deflect the negative attention he's getting from the war and boost his popularity back up 😛

Not likely. This will piss off the uneducated masses who think affirmative action is a good thing.
You mean they won't like this at your Trailer Park?

Oh now who is the Elitist here....
 
All I have to say is that when I was 18 I didn't get a job because I wasn't Hispanic, Black or Female... And I was told so!!! The job placement sheet stated that the applicant HAD to be a minority...

I know there is still Racism going on...

I know there is Reverse Racism....

And sexism both ways to!

So I suggest we do away with the sex and race blocks on application forms! Hell age blocks shouls only be 18-25 26-32 etc.... Cause age is at times used to deny people jobs....


BTW... I answer in the other block on RACE: "HUMAN" Verizon even called me back and said I couldn't put that... LOL I asked if they hired Humans or not...
 
Back
Top