where do I go to meet an "evangelical"??

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Rob9874
The problem is, Christians can't separate the two. There is no separation between their "Christian life", and their "regular life". When you believe that God created the concept of existence, the universe, and everything in it, and your purpose on this earth is to serve him, it becomes the basis for your life. How can you put that on the shelf and not consider it when you're dealing with a secular society?
Muslims have the same problem!
Not all of them.
No and most people I know who say they are Christians are not as nutty as the Evangelicals either.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Condor
My issue with gays isn't a moral one. I really don't care. My issue with them is that they were stupid enough to spread HIV/AIDS. Once it crossed into the heterosexual population, it was all over for hundreds of thousands. Another source of AIDS is drug habits that involve exchange of blood products with multi use needles. The liberals on these boards say that Bush should fix the health system. He didn't break it. Smokers, drug users and AIDS patients are the ones who are swamping the system. Ambulance chasing attornies are a close third. Funny that liberals support gays and tried to get an ambulance chaser elected VP! There is a lack of logical thought evidenced there. My only problem with gays is when they become a burden on the health system.

I'd take exception to your statement that gays were "stupid" to spread HIV/ AIDS. Most gay people who have died from complications associated with an HIV// AIDS infection contracted the virus long before the mechanism of transmission was understood. Gay people having sex is no more "stupid" than heterosexual people having sex, as far as I can tell.

I'd like to see some evidence that HIV/ AIDs patients and drug users are swamping your health system. What are the annual costs of treating citizens with AIDS relative to say the treatment of citizens with cancers, heart disease, and so on? I'd like some recent data, please.

As for smoking, my understanding is that taxes on tobacco produce a rather large income for governments. Whether it is equivalent to the cost of actually treating patients for smoking related illness I am not sure.

 

GrGr

Diamond Member
Sep 25, 2003
3,204
1
76
What about Greed? That would seem a big one to me. Eye of the needle... camels... that sort of stuff.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Pliablemoose
If you're an Aussie' like in your profile, don't worry, they're coming to meet you soon:)

Abortion debate flares in Australia
yes, it's a bit scary.

so is it really true that there are "two americas"? the secular humanists, and the theocrats?


No, that is a very simplistic perspective. Liberals just love that perspective because it divides all of us into two groups and gives them something to whine about. The truth is that even in the churches in the south, you ask two people and you will get two answers. The topic has gotten liberal attention lately because they hate Bush and his honesty has given them this somewhat dubious handle to work with. They tried to prove that he did cocaine and various other things and never could. They even enlisted Larry Flynt (who will pay a liberals way to Canada, by the way!) to get some dirt on him in the 2000 election. He offered an award for any woman other than his wife who could prove that she had slept with him outside marriage. He failed too. They finally had to find something he does and make it evil. He admits to being a Christian, so that is their target these days. This thread is simply another bash Bush thread under guise of an attack on Christians. The broader issue that they go after is the pro-lifers. I consider both sides of that debate as a little outside the realm of reality as well. Memorise this: Female liberals have one issue and that is abortion rights. Male liberals have one issue and that is drug legalization. Any appearance beyond that is simply fog and spin.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: ariafrost
Da South. And Evangelicals is lumping a big group of people and labeling them. Not all "Evangelicals" like Bush and it is only a small group that is reactionary.

Isn't that what they call themselves? I thought they mostly voted for Bush, isn't that how he won the election?
In actuality, no, Evangelicals are not how Bush won. That meme was developed by a few on the liberal side of the equation to invent a whipping boy for the opposition. Overall, the Evangelicals were no more responsible for Bush's victory than any other large group that tended to vote for Bush. I think a big percentage of people over 60 voted for Bush as well so his re-election could just as easily be 'blamed' on them. Problem is, it doesn't sell well to villify senior citizens. It's much easier to stir the pot over those 'hateful' Evangelicals and make them the bad guy.

I hardly think liberals invented this so-called meme; it was Rove's stated strategy.

Explain yourself.

Did Karl Rove not have a plan of "getting out the vote" (what a dumb phrase) among the 4 million evangelical xian suckers who did not vote in 2000?
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: ariafrost
Da South. And Evangelicals is lumping a big group of people and labeling them. Not all "Evangelicals" like Bush and it is only a small group that is reactionary.

Isn't that what they call themselves? I thought they mostly voted for Bush, isn't that how he won the election?
In actuality, no, Evangelicals are not how Bush won. That meme was developed by a few on the liberal side of the equation to invent a whipping boy for the opposition. Overall, the Evangelicals were no more responsible for Bush's victory than any other large group that tended to vote for Bush. I think a big percentage of people over 60 voted for Bush as well so his re-election could just as easily be 'blamed' on them. Problem is, it doesn't sell well to villify senior citizens. It's much easier to stir the pot over those 'hateful' Evangelicals and make them the bad guy.
Clearly the 'hateful' evangelicals ARE the bad guys, and something definitely has to be done about them. But first, we need to gather information on these creatures. I think a field trip is going to be necessary.


 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: ariafrost
Da South. And Evangelicals is lumping a big group of people and labeling them. Not all "Evangelicals" like Bush and it is only a small group that is reactionary.

Isn't that what they call themselves? I thought they mostly voted for Bush, isn't that how he won the election?


Democrats are trying to tell themselves that in order to deny that the voters just didn't like their candidate. In actuality, the base of people that voted for Bush was very diversified much like America is. More than half the voters voted for Bush. That included the northeast, Midwest, west, north central, southwest, south central and southeast. Evangelicals are mostly centered in only one of those regions and every preacher in America wishes he had that many church members attending every Sunday.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Neos
To clarify the homosexual issue from an evangelical position:
All have sinned, and come short. That includes me. That includes you. That includes gays. Problem we Evangelicals have with the homosexual movement (the radical, extreme, heard portion) is that they would make this particular sin (which is an especially bad one in God's eyes) mainstream. They have sought to glorify sodomy (English call it buggering) between two men. Many folk who have children and grandchildren do not want this behavior exhibited in such a flagrant way - trying to normalize it - and make it acceptable to all. It all goes back to a truism when I was a kid. When I was doing something that I knew deep down was wrong - I wanted someone to go on the journey with me. The more that I could get to do as I was doing - the more I felt that I was OK.


explain your priorities. there are all these important issues that might have influenced your vote in a certain direction, like:
--the massive and growing inequality b/w rich and poor in your country
--the lies, deceptions, of your president and his goons
--the Iraq fiasco -- 100,000 civilians dead
--Bin Laden on the loose, US military stretched to breaking point in Iraq
--the loss of respect and admiration of the US among people the world over
--the looming bankruptcy of your social security system
--Bush's so called "tax cuts" (hand-outs for the wealthy) 50% of which -- one trillion dollars -- went to the wealthiest 1% of your population
--and so on

but you evangelical folx (apparently, supposedly) chose to ignore the above, and focus instead on the all-important (lol) abortion & gay marriage...

Why??????????????????????????????????????

also, I'm wondering thought where you got the idea that it was ok to start banning things that you don't agree with (or things that 'God' doesn't agree with).

Just to take one of your fake issues in context:

--the Iraq fiasco -- 100,000 civilians dead

How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Condor
How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

Probably a small fraction compared to those who succumbed to health problems due to over eating and lack of exercise. Talk about preventable diseases.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Just to take one of your fake issues in context:

--the Iraq fiasco -- 100,000 civilians dead

How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

My friend, I will answer that when you provide me with the data proving your assertion that HIV/AIDS patients are "swamping" the US health system.

Surely you don't expect me to believe something is true just because you say it is? :)
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Neos
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What makes your Mythical Beliefs any different than those of the Ancient Greeks or Egyptians?

How about scientific proof that the God of the Bible is who he says he is - Jehovah ? How about Scientific proof that he gave us instructions on how to really know what life is all about ?

Not religion! Not dogma!


You prove to me that this computer that I am using works without using theories! Someone is walking on the sidewalk and a tree falls and gets diverted at the last second and they are saved from death, they thank God. You strike a key, your BS appears on the screen, and you thank electronics. How is that different? You can't see or tough an electron. You can only quote theories as well. As much as our egos want us to believe that we understand everything under the sun, we don't! The bible is an old document and many things happen daily that don't have clear explanations. Faith is as good a way to explain them as any. I will give you some points for the religious nuts that deny provable evolution, but not much else.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: conjur
Originally posted by: Rob9874
Originally posted by: conjur
Those are civil laws. They reach beyond just religious meanings. Never heard the phrase: Your rights end where mine begin?

The problem is, Christians can't separate the two. There is no separation between their "Christian life", and their "regular life". When you believe that God created the concept of existence, the universe, and everything in it, and your purpose on this earth is to serve him, it becomes the basis for your life. How can you put that on the shelf and not consider it when you're dealing with a secular society?
There are plenty of Christians that can separate the two. Most Catholics, for example, and Greek Orthodox and even many Lutherans (Garrison Keillor ring any bells?).

Are you telling me that there are enough hard shell Baptists to elect a President?

 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: ariafrost
Da South. And Evangelicals is lumping a big group of people and labeling them. Not all "Evangelicals" like Bush and it is only a small group that is reactionary.

Isn't that what they call themselves? I thought they mostly voted for Bush, isn't that how he won the election?
In actuality, no, Evangelicals are not how Bush won. That meme was developed by a few on the liberal side of the equation to invent a whipping boy for the opposition. Overall, the Evangelicals were no more responsible for Bush's victory than any other large group that tended to vote for Bush. I think a big percentage of people over 60 voted for Bush as well so his re-election could just as easily be 'blamed' on them. Problem is, it doesn't sell well to villify senior citizens. It's much easier to stir the pot over those 'hateful' Evangelicals and make them the bad guy.

I hardly think liberals invented this so-called meme; it was Rove's stated strategy.

Explain yourself.

Did Karl Rove not have a plan of "getting out the vote" (what a dumb phrase) among the 4 million evangelical xian suckers who did not vote in 2000?
Rove's strategy was to pander to anyone he thought would vote for Bush. Kerry's strategy was to pander to anyone he thought would vote for him. That's how campaigning works. Additionally, Rove didn't have to work hard to get the vote out to xians. They were already sold because their values more closely match that of the Republiacn party.

Rove did not invent this meme of the Evangelicals winning the election for Bush. That came from the RBH'rs. They, like you, paint the Evangelicals as hateful so the RBH sheeple will hate them reflexively without even thinking it over. 'Those xians are hateful asshats...and I hate them!' How stupid is that?

Of course, realizing how foolish this whole 'hate' thing is requires just a small amount of thinking, something I believe the RBH'rs are entirely failing to do. They'd rather point fingers of blame and call people ignorant. Problem is, they end up looking far more ignorant than the people they are indicting.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Condor
My issue with gays isn't a moral one. I really don't care. My issue with them is that they were stupid enough to spread HIV/AIDS. Once it crossed into the heterosexual population, it was all over for hundreds of thousands. Another source of AIDS is drug habits that involve exchange of blood products with multi use needles. The liberals on these boards say that Bush should fix the health system. He didn't break it. Smokers, drug users and AIDS patients are the ones who are swamping the system. Ambulance chasing attornies are a close third. Funny that liberals support gays and tried to get an ambulance chaser elected VP! There is a lack of logical thought evidenced there. My only problem with gays is when they become a burden on the health system.
Don't forget the Slothful and the Gluttons. Lazy ass fat slobs are more of a drain financially through health care costs than all of the others you mentioned combined.

That is a problem too, but they usually just die. They don't require $30K a year of meidcations to stay alive.

 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Neos
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What makes your Mythical Beliefs any different than those of the Ancient Greeks or Egyptians?

How about scientific proof that the God of the Bible is who he says he is - Jehovah ? How about Scientific proof that he gave us instructions on how to really know what life is all about ?

Not religion! Not dogma!


You prove to me that this computer that I am using works without using theories! Someone is walking on the sidewalk and a tree falls and gets diverted at the last second and they are saved from death, they thank God. You strike a key, your BS appears on the screen, and you thank electronics. How is that different? You can't see or tough an electron. You can only quote theories as well. As much as our egos want us to believe that we understand everything under the sun, we don't! The bible is an old document and many things happen daily that don't have clear explanations. Faith is as good a way to explain them as any. I will give you some points for the religious nuts that deny provable evolution, but not much else.
On the contrary, it's our egos that create Myths and Religions. We cannot comprehend that there are things that are beyond our grasp of knowledge so we make up crap like the Bible to so we can feel good about having all the answers.
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Condor
My issue with gays isn't a moral one. I really don't care. My issue with them is that they were stupid enough to spread HIV/AIDS. Once it crossed into the heterosexual population, it was all over for hundreds of thousands. Another source of AIDS is drug habits that involve exchange of blood products with multi use needles. The liberals on these boards say that Bush should fix the health system. He didn't break it. Smokers, drug users and AIDS patients are the ones who are swamping the system. Ambulance chasing attornies are a close third. Funny that liberals support gays and tried to get an ambulance chaser elected VP! There is a lack of logical thought evidenced there. My only problem with gays is when they become a burden on the health system.

I'd take exception to your statement that gays were "stupid" to spread HIV/ AIDS. Most gay people who have died from complications associated with an HIV// AIDS infection contracted the virus long before the mechanism of transmission was understood. Gay people having sex is no more "stupid" than heterosexual people having sex, as far as I can tell.

I'd like to see some evidence that HIV/ AIDs patients and drug users are swamping your health system. What are the annual costs of treating citizens with AIDS relative to say the treatment of citizens with cancers, heart disease, and so on? I'd like some recent data, please.

As for smoking, my understanding is that taxes on tobacco produce a rather large income for governments. Whether it is equivalent to the cost of actually treating patients for smoking related illness I am not sure.

The means of the spread of Aids was known as early as 1983. Playboy did articles on it.

Anything that costs $30K per year to treat can't be minimized! Not only is it costly to treat, it also threatens the lives of the medical professionals who attend the patients.

If you have any evidence that governments shared the tobacco money with medical institutions, present it!

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Condor
How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

Probably a small fraction compared to those who succumbed to health problems due to over eating and lack of exercise. Talk about preventable diseases.

I'm 6 ft 6 and weigh 230. Nuff said about my belief there.

 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Condor
My issue with gays isn't a moral one. I really don't care. My issue with them is that they were stupid enough to spread HIV/AIDS. Once it crossed into the heterosexual population, it was all over for hundreds of thousands. Another source of AIDS is drug habits that involve exchange of blood products with multi use needles. The liberals on these boards say that Bush should fix the health system. He didn't break it. Smokers, drug users and AIDS patients are the ones who are swamping the system. Ambulance chasing attornies are a close third. Funny that liberals support gays and tried to get an ambulance chaser elected VP! There is a lack of logical thought evidenced there. My only problem with gays is when they become a burden on the health system.
Don't forget the Slothful and the Gluttons. Lazy ass fat slobs are more of a drain financially through health care costs than all of the others you mentioned combined.

That is a problem too, but they usually just die. They don't require $30K a year of meidcations to stay alive.
Are you denying that they are more of a financial drain than HIV/AIDs?

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Condor
Just to take one of your fake issues in context:

--the Iraq fiasco -- 100,000 civilians dead

How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

My friend, I will answer that when you provide me with the data proving your assertion that HIV/AIDS patients are "swamping" the US health system.

Surely you don't expect me to believe something is true just because you say it is? :)


I sort of expected you to have been watching the news and reading. This isn't the first grade.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Condor
Just to take one of your fake issues in context:

--the Iraq fiasco -- 100,000 civilians dead

How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

My friend, I will answer that when you provide me with the data proving your assertion that HIV/AIDS patients are "swamping" the US health system.

Surely you don't expect me to believe something is true just because you say it is? :)


I sort of expected you to have been watching the news and reading. This isn't the first grade.
Obviously he has because he is stating that your claim is false!
 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: Neos
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
What makes your Mythical Beliefs any different than those of the Ancient Greeks or Egyptians?

How about scientific proof that the God of the Bible is who he says he is - Jehovah ? How about Scientific proof that he gave us instructions on how to really know what life is all about ?

Not religion! Not dogma!


You prove to me that this computer that I am using works without using theories! Someone is walking on the sidewalk and a tree falls and gets diverted at the last second and they are saved from death, they thank God. You strike a key, your BS appears on the screen, and you thank electronics. How is that different? You can't see or tough an electron. You can only quote theories as well. As much as our egos want us to believe that we understand everything under the sun, we don't! The bible is an old document and many things happen daily that don't have clear explanations. Faith is as good a way to explain them as any. I will give you some points for the religious nuts that deny provable evolution, but not much else.
On the contrary, it's our egos that create Myths and Religions. We cannot comprehend that there are things that are beyond our grasp of knowledge so we make up crap like the Bible to so we can feel good about having all the answers.


I think they are created in order to attempt to explain the unknown.
 

Gen Stonewall

Senior member
Aug 8, 2001
629
0
0
Clearly the 'hateful' evangelicals ARE the bad guys, and something definitely has to be done about them. But first, we need to gather information on these creatures. I think a field trip is going to be necessary.

Are you proposing a "final solution"? I sure hope this is sarcasm.

On the contrary, it's our egos that create Myths and Religions. We cannot comprehend that there are things that are beyond our grasp of knowledge so we make up crap like the Bible to so we can feel good about having all the answers.

Um, nearly every book in the New Testament was written by someone who saw Jesus personally (Paul saw him in a vision). I hardly think those eyewitness accounts were written to comprehend "things that are beyond our grasp of knowledge." That thesis holds no water when you actually read the Bible.
 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: Condor
How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

It is important to realise that the HIV virus was initially primarily spread by gay males only in the West (the US, Europe, etc.) In Africa, the illness is, and always has been, transmitted primarily through heterosexual sexual contacts. The fact that HIV/ AIDS affected gay males (in the west) was the result of an unfortunate coincidence: i.e., a gay man travelled to Africa, had sex with someone infected with the virus, contracted the virus, returned to the US, and passed the infection on within the gay community. What would have happened if it had been a heterosexual US traveller who contracted the illness and returned to the US?


 

aidanjm

Lifer
Aug 9, 2004
12,411
2
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Rove's strategy was to pander to anyone he thought would vote for Bush. Kerry's strategy was to pander to anyone he thought would vote for him. That's how campaigning works. Additionally, Rove didn't have to work hard to get the vote out to xians. They were already sold because their values more closely match that of the Republiacn party.

Rove did not invent this meme of the Evangelicals winning the election for Bush. That came from the RBH'rs. They, like you, paint the Evangelicals as hateful so the RBH sheeple will hate them reflexively without even thinking it over. 'Those xians are hateful asshats...and I hate them!' How stupid is that?

Of course, realizing how foolish this whole 'hate' thing is requires just a small amount of thinking, something I believe the RBH'rs are entirely failing to do. They'd rather point fingers of blame and call people ignorant. Problem is, they end up looking far more ignorant than the people they are indicting.

What is RBH?
I do not 'hate' the evangelicals, they are an enigma to me. I seek information on this curious phenomenon of fundamentalist xian voters.

 

imported_Condor

Diamond Member
Sep 22, 2004
5,425
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: Condor
Originally posted by: aidanjm
Originally posted by: Condor
Just to take one of your fake issues in context:

--the Iraq fiasco -- 100,000 civilians dead

How many people has HIV/AIDs killed in the world since Gays propagated it in 1983?

My friend, I will answer that when you provide me with the data proving your assertion that HIV/AIDS patients are "swamping" the US health system.

Surely you don't expect me to believe something is true just because you say it is? :)


I sort of expected you to have been watching the news and reading. This isn't the first grade.
Obviously he has because he is stating that your claim is false!

My wife ia a medical professional and she has a pretty clear understanding that is not based on reading the Internet. She has friends that have become infected with HIV simply because they closed a fluids tube incorrectly and got cut. My knowledge, like most of my postings, does come from very close.