Don Karnage
Platinum Member
- Oct 11, 2011
- 2,865
- 0
- 0
Come on guys. Do you actually believe nvidia would give the real 680 a 256 bit memory bus? Big Kepler wasn't ready so they slapped the 680 name on it.
Come on guys. Do you actually believe nvidia would give the real 680 a 256 bit memory bus? Big Kepler wasn't ready so they slapped the 680 name on it.
"dude", it was NOT originally intended to be high though. its only 30-35% faster than the previous generation which is not impressive at all. AGAIN the MAIN reason that the the gtx680 look good is because the 7970 is 550 bucks and really not all that fast for a next card itself.Performs high end, dude, so it's high end.
"dude", it was NOT originally intended to be high though. its only 30-35% faster than the previous generation which is not impressive at all. AGAIN the MAIN reason that the the gtx680 look good is because the 7970 is 550 bucks and really not all that fast for a next card itself.
Yup. But it's the fastest GPU out there, so it's high end. So NVIDIA gets to soup up their margins and take their sweet, sweet time making GK110 or whatever work. Go NVIDIA.
It's better than showing up 6-9 months late to the fight against the 7970, right? Like they did with the 480? Imagine if the GTX 560 Ti (GK114) had been released to fight the 5870? Then NVIDIA could've skipped the 470/480 and made the 580 after GTX 560 Ti held the fort.
Come on guys. Do you actually believe nvidia would give the real 680 a 256 bit memory bus? Big Kepler wasn't ready so they slapped the 680 name on it.
Good point, why not a 384-bit like the 7970? Perhaps on the 4GB version? :\
No, you can't just up the bus size without redesigning the chip.
gtx580/590 has nothing to do with Kepler. and a specific chip cannot just add something unless it was already there in the first place. and gk104 was supposed to be a mid range performance card so of course it would not need a 384 bit bus.I assume they could with the transition from 40-nm to a 28-nm chip, and the GTX 580/590 having 384-bit bus width, why a narrower 256-bit at all. Perhaps doing so will further decrease their production yield? Heat/power consumption?
are you talking to me? I was simply saying that you cant just magically increase the bus width as gk104 was designed with a certain number of controllers and they are all enabled.here we go again. give it a rest already, agree to disagree.
well it goes with the context of my point though. it was a mid range chip with a 256bit bus. there is nothing there to unlock to make it 384 bit.No sir, it was to the "gtx680 is midrange" argument. It's been beaten to death already.
No sir, it was to the "gtx680 is midrange" argument. It's been beaten to death already.
2. Even if the price drops, GTX 680 will sell for $400-450+ assuming the 7970 comes sub 500 and then GTX 685 will be like $550-650 or so.
The GTX685 at $550 would be a good deal (based on what we know today, if true). The gTX680 at $500 currently is not a good deal in my opinion. I am tempted to just grab myself a 580 at $360 and wait for the 700 series.
I'm personally waiting for 580's to flirt with 299.99 so i can grab a few
I'm personally waiting for 580's to flirt with 299.99 so i can grab a few
When people stop buying them at this price.When will the GTX 680 prices drop?
