Is it good to breath in smoke?
Yes or no?
Second hand smoke - is it still smoke?
No studies needed.
Nah, I don't think anyone would disagree with that. My point, is that the first major FDA study claims that second-hand smoke is
more dangerous than the smoke inhaled by the smoker, by virtue of it being unfiltered.
Well, to a mindless simpleton, this kind of argument sounds plausible. A little thinking, then you realize how stupid it is.
First, how much smoke is the smoker inhaling, directly, vs how much a bystander is exposed to after smoke particles are naturally diffused? A huge fraction of the amount.
Second, the evil poisons and tar and such present in the smoke is going to be naturally filtered as it diffuses anyway.
It's the claims in such studies that are ridiculous, and the fact that the data was fudged beyond belief--especially when laymen repeat them as if they are fact.
But don't shoot the messenger. Courts invalidated that FDA study for second-hand smoke.
Is second hand smoke bad? yeah, I'd think so; but so is walking down a city street and inhaling all the vehicle exhaust. Is that worse than second-hand smoke? Probably.
Just stop being so naive.