When is fake media going to stop the rumors about the president

[Meghan54]

You promise its the last time you'll say something so stupid?

LOL! He's as bad as Trump, and the probability that either will never say anything as stupid is literally zero.

 

[ivwshane]

I don't see any paper work or recording in the news to support any of the recent accusations about president Trump.

Just so I know you aren't some partisan hack, can you show me any post of yours where you had any scrutiny about any negative Obama story? Any post where you criticized the right for their ridiculous anti-obama posts?

 

[shortylickens]

Funny how when its about Hillary it all of a sudden becomes real news.

 

[Vic]

Trumpist logic: in order to protect the 1st amendment, we must make it illegal for the FAKE NEWS media to say anything negative about the POTUS.

We are through the looking glass, people.

 

[JSt0rm]

Trumpist logic: in order to protect the 1st amendment, we must make it illegal for the FAKE NEWS media to say anything negative about the POTUS.

We are through the looking glass, people.

They never cared about that. They are the American version of isis and would be as extreme if they were allowed. It would take 30 years or so but they would end up throwing gays off roofs and killing journalists.

 

[Jhhnn]

Authoritarians exploit free speech & open elections to gain power, not to keep it. That's why it's so important that they be kept out of power.

 

[shortylickens]

More fake news:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...0e4656c22aa_story.html?utm_term=.61d5290a209f

 

[zinfamous]

More fake news:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...0e4656c22aa_story.html?utm_term=.61d5290a209f

The interesting thing about this bold, unethical public proclamation of a person't mental health (essentially, this breaks the "Goldwater rule" in the by-laws of Psychiatry and journalistic integrity), is that as honest as is the information being projected by George F Will, David Brooks, and the National Review/Kristol , et al., this strategy is going to likewise open a debate and public hearing of grievances about the ethics of discrimination in the workforce (removing a duly-appointed employee by charges of mental/medical disability).

Here comes the ACLU!

 

[Jhhnn]

The interesting thing about this bold, unethical public proclamation of a person't mental health (essentially, this breaks the "Goldwater rule" in the by-laws of Psychiatry and journalistic integrity), is that as honest as is the information being projected by George F Will, David Brooks, and the National Review/Kristol , et al., this strategy is going to likewise open a debate and public hearing of grievances about the ethics of discrimination in the workforce (removing a duly-appointed employee by charges of mental/medical disability).

Here comes the ACLU!

It's not like Trump's ego would ever let him claim disability or that his devotees would even consider the idea...