CaptainGoodnight
Golden Member
Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Remove guns, weapons violence almost disappears as a social issue.
Until someone flies a plane into a building or bombs a subway.
Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Remove guns, weapons violence almost disappears as a social issue.
Originally posted by: Vic
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: ElMonoDelMar
There are some states that allow CCW on college campuses and they don't have 1 shooting per year let alone 1 every two weeks.Originally posted by: Lothar
That's pretty much nonsense.
If student was packing a gun I can guarantee you that there will be a shooting incident at least once every 2 week.
Sure 29 students won't die in one day like today, but the total deaths from guns will either still be the same (or may even end up higher) by the end of the year.
How many students on campus has died from guns at VA Tech this year?
Like was said earlier most college students aren't mature enough.
People will shoot while drunk, shoot the boyfriend their ex is going out with, and shoot teachers who gave them bad grades.
Hell, since I've been going to this school for 5 years now there has been numerous suicides...
1.) A student jumped from the School of Business.
2.) A student jumped from the School of Engineering.
3.) A medical school student stabbed himself to death because of class stress and also girlfriend issues.
4.) A lesbian student jumped from the 9th floor of my dormitory because she saw her partner talking to another girl and was jealous. This was particularly disgusting as I saw the blood stains and the head separated from the body on this one as I was entering the dormitory.
5.) A male student jumped from the 10th floor of the opposite dormitory to the one above because his girl dumped him for one of his friends.
In each of those cases, I would prefer if such mentally unstable idiots keep jumping off buildings killing themselves and no one else than to be parading around with guns in my dormitory or school department.
There are schools that don't allow guns on campuses and they don't have 1 shooting per year.
Your point?
His point was that your logic was flawed. In some areas, people pack all the time and not a single violent crime takes place. In others, carrying is illegal and yet murders are commonplace. And vice versa.
Britain has strict gun control and low gun crime. Russia has strict gun control and the world's highest murder rate. Switzerland has little gun control and virtually no gun crime. The US has relatively lax gun control and a relatively high murder (although 1/5th that of Russia).
The problem with the anti-gunners is that they refuse to recognize that their argument of correlation does not exist. In fact, they're just like the drug warriors in this regard, who refuse to recognize that drug laws do nothing to stop drug abuse. In the same vein, gun control does nothing to stop gun crime.
Remember, we're talking about murder here. Not only is that the most serious crime in any country, but it is also an act that tends to destroy the life of the murderer just as much as that of the victim, except in the rare cases of true psychopaths. Notice that our murderer here at VT took his own life after taking all those others. Some of you people seem to be very confused about the actual subject here. Once a person makes the decision to murder, to actually take the life of another human being, the breaking of other minor crimes, like those against gun possession, tend to have very little meaning.
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Sorry but I don't trust the general public to be as highly trained as police officers.
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Sorry but I don't trust the general public to be as highly trained as police officers.
Originally posted by: BoberFett
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Sorry but I don't trust the general public to be as highly trained as police officers.
Yes, we should all be so highly trained. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Bell
At the time Bell was holding his bachelor party at Kalua Cabaret, a venue notorious for prostitution, drug-arrests and liquor-law violations. The club was being investigated by seven undercover police detectives.[9] The New York Post reported that, according to an unnamed undercover officer, Guzman had an argument inside the club with a woman and threatened to get a gun. The woman was reportedly overheard saying to the men arguing with Bell's friends, "I'm not doing you all. I'll do one or two, but not all."[10] The undercover officer followed the group and Bell was ordered by the officer to raise his hands after getting in his car. Instead, the car hit the undercover officer and, seconds later, an unmarked police minivan.[1] A toxicology report reportedly showed that he was legally drunk at the time of the shooting.
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Sorry but I don't trust the general public to be as highly trained as police officers.
Police officers are poorly trained. I won't go into details but I had a gun pulled on me callously and had it pressed up against my back. By a police officer. The three idiots didn't seem to understand you don't point your gun at something you don't intend to kill.
I won't retell the entire story but to say that I didn't end up getting as much as a fine, and it was in broad daylight.
As a hunting enthusiast is was the most reckless use of firearms I had ever witnessed.
Originally posted by: ElMonoDelMar
Or as well trained as this guy...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeGD7r6s-zU
Glock Fotay!!!
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: ElMonoDelMar
Or as well trained as this guy...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeGD7r6s-zU
Glock Fotay!!!
He's a professional and if he screwed up that bad I am pretty sure I wouldn't trust Joe Blow who has poo stains in his underwear.
Originally posted by: ElMonoDelMar
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: ElMonoDelMar
Or as well trained as this guy...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeGD7r6s-zU
Glock Fotay!!!
He's a professional and if he screwed up that bad I am pretty sure I wouldn't trust Joe Blow who has poo stains in his underwear.
My point is everyone can screw up. What makes cops special and immune to that?
I see you don't understand sarcasm.Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Originally posted by: Conky
Why not just cut the index fingers off of everybody's hands instead? Without trigger-fingers there can be no mass shootings either. :roll:Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: 6000SUX
The easy answer, if you're worried about gun violence, is for no one to carry guns. Guess how many mass shootings Britain has on their school campuses?
And we see how well "Gun free" zones work dont we.
Britian still has crime. Dont be naive. You can change the weapon of the crime, but you cant stop crime itself.
To blame the weapon for the crime is pretty silly.
Just pointing out the obvious: remove guns from the equation and you don't have mass shootings. :disgust:
Nope. Just like we don't need to cut off feet to avoid deaths from foot-launched rockets, we don't need to cut off other parts to avoid gun violence. Just remove the guns. You get the prize for "least well-founded argument ever". Kudos.
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: ElMonoDelMar
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: ElMonoDelMar
Or as well trained as this guy...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MeGD7r6s-zU
Glock Fotay!!!
He's a professional and if he screwed up that bad I am pretty sure I wouldn't trust Joe Blow who has poo stains in his underwear.
My point is everyone can screw up. What makes cops special and immune to that?
Yes everyone can screw up but the odds of a highly trained law enforcement officer screwing up compared to your local slack jawed yockel are lower IMHO.
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Sorry but I don't trust the general public to be as highly trained as police officers.
Police officers are poorly trained. I won't go into details but I had a gun pulled on me callously and had it pressed up against my back. By a police officer. The three idiots didn't seem to understand you don't point your gun at something you don't intend to kill.
I won't retell the entire story but to say that I didn't end up getting as much as a fine, and it was in broad daylight.
As a hunting enthusiast is was the most reckless use of firearms I had ever witnessed.
I rather deal with a cop then a scared civilian who would shoot me out of fear or ignorance. My money is on the cops having guns sorry. Don't get me wrong I have no problems with guns meant for hunting but arming every slacked jawed nut case on the street is just plain stupid IMHO. Again if you want to decrease violence then change our culture so that it does not glamorize and promote violence. After this is done we can be a bigger version of Switzerland.
Originally posted by: Conky
I see you don't understand sarcasm.Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Originally posted by: Conky
Why not just cut the index fingers off of everybody's hands instead? Without trigger-fingers there can be no mass shootings either. :roll:Originally posted by: 6000SUX
Originally posted by: Specop 007
Originally posted by: 6000SUX
The easy answer, if you're worried about gun violence, is for no one to carry guns. Guess how many mass shootings Britain has on their school campuses?
And we see how well "Gun free" zones work dont we.
Britian still has crime. Dont be naive. You can change the weapon of the crime, but you cant stop crime itself.
To blame the weapon for the crime is pretty silly.
Just pointing out the obvious: remove guns from the equation and you don't have mass shootings. :disgust:
Nope. Just like we don't need to cut off feet to avoid deaths from foot-launched rockets, we don't need to cut off other parts to avoid gun violence. Just remove the guns. You get the prize for "least well-founded argument ever". Kudos.
Simply remove the guns? Wow, that would be really simple... much like your mind. 😛
I'll play along for arguments sake. How does one "remove the guns" anyway? Pass a law? Seriously, enlighten me oh wise one.
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Originally posted by: Farang
Originally posted by: Drift3r
Sorry but I don't trust the general public to be as highly trained as police officers.
Police officers are poorly trained. I won't go into details but I had a gun pulled on me callously and had it pressed up against my back. By a police officer. The three idiots didn't seem to understand you don't point your gun at something you don't intend to kill.
I won't retell the entire story but to say that I didn't end up getting as much as a fine, and it was in broad daylight.
As a hunting enthusiast is was the most reckless use of firearms I had ever witnessed.
I rather deal with a cop then a scared civilian who would shoot me out of fear or ignorance. My money is on the cops having guns sorry. Don't get me wrong I have no problems with guns meant for hunting but arming every slacked jawed nut case on the street is just plain stupid IMHO. Again if you want to decrease violence then change our culture so that it does not glamorize and promote violence. After this is done we can be a bigger version of Switzerland.
I think you're making broad generalizations without any proof to back it up. If we are just talking out of our asses I would argue the idiots using guns recklessly are more likely to be the ones who buy them illegally, rather than those non-felons who buy them at the gun shop and apply for a permit. I would say that most people who carry guns legally are aware of when they are and are not allowed to fire in self-defense, and are aware that a gun should never be pulled unless you intend to use it.
Either way we are both just talking out of our asses.
Originally posted by: Farang
Drift3r, your argument is missing the point. Culture of violence or not, we have easy access to guns in this country. What the OP is about is gun-free zones, which really only take the guns out of the pockets of honest people while obviously any criminal is going to disregard them. The idea of having these little bubbles that will be gun-free creates a situation like we witnessed today, where the only armed man ends up running through classrooms unopposed slaughtering innocent people.
Don't like people owning handguns? Great.. but a different argument. As it stands I don't see the purpose of gun-free zones.
Originally posted by: Kwaipie
College students with concealed weapon permits?
Has the person that suggested this ever been on a college campus? These people are absolute morons and you want to arm them.
*shudder*