Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: Eeezee
The correct answer is "I don't give a damn"
BMI is a meaningless number.
eezee is fat.
I wouldn't say it is meaningless. It is quite accurate for relatively sedate office workers. It is not aimed at the athlete that trains 5-10x a week for 10-15hrs! The guy that trains 'properly' for 10-15hrs should be quite in shape and have a decent amount of muscle mass so he'll be in the overweight range easilyl.
=====
Height: 1.77 meters
Weight: 85 kilograms
Your BMI is 27.1, indicating your weight is in the overweight category for adults of your height. w00t w00t!
=====
Koing
Originally posted by: PrinceofWands
Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: legoman666
Originally posted by: Eeezee
The correct answer is "I don't give a damn"
BMI is a meaningless number.
eezee is fat.
I wouldn't say it is meaningless. It is quite accurate for relatively sedate office workers. It is not aimed at the athlete that trains 5-10x a week for 10-15hrs! The guy that trains 'properly' for 10-15hrs should be quite in shape and have a decent amount of muscle mass so he'll be in the overweight range easilyl.
=====
Height: 1.77 meters
Weight: 85 kilograms
Your BMI is 27.1, indicating your weight is in the overweight category for adults of your height. w00t w00t!
=====
Koing
You hardly have to be serious to be outside BMI. Many people, for instance those of Samoan descent, have naturally thicker bodies and denser structures. They will be misjudged by BMI quite frequently. Anyone with a thicker bone/muscle structure, but shorter stature will be called obese, even when they're not. These things have nothing to do with working out or being athletic. It's true that I did life weights, but only 3 times a week for 45 minutes a day...and that was about my only exercise other than occasionally walking or jogging. I'm just naturally very strong/muscular for my height.
BMI isn't the only measure to fail for these reasons...any type of tape test, or caliper test will fail as often as not, and should therefore NEVER be used. There are so many good methods to measure health and body fat that there is no excuse to fall back on these totally debunked methods.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
BMI is really not accurate for many.
At less than 10% BF I show up as clinically obese.
Originally posted by: Eeezee
The correct answer is "I don't give a damn"
BMI is a meaningless number.
Originally posted by: alkemyst
BMI is really not accurate for many.
At less than 10% BF I show up as clinically obese.
Since when is 9% BF slightly out of shape?Originally posted by: Juddog
BMI index sucks for weightlifters. When I was into lifting when I was younger, I weighed 195 at 6'2 with only 9 % BF (which is slightly out of shape but fairly muscular), yet BMI showed as 25.
Originally posted by: child of wonder
6'0" 225 lbs
30.5
Apparently I'm obese, however since I have a large build 200 lbs would be my ideal weight and that would still be very overweight according to BMI so I wipe my ass with it.
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Since when is 9% BF slightly out of shape?Originally posted by: Juddog
BMI index sucks for weightlifters. When I was into lifting when I was younger, I weighed 195 at 6'2 with only 9 % BF (which is slightly out of shape but fairly muscular), yet BMI showed as 25.
Originally posted by: theplaidfad
You know it's summer when you see 5 fatty fat threads going on at the same time.
/Thread
Originally posted by: ch33zw1z
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Since when is 9% BF slightly out of shape?Originally posted by: Juddog
BMI index sucks for weightlifters. When I was into lifting when I was younger, I weighed 195 at 6'2 with only 9 % BF (which is slightly out of shape but fairly muscular), yet BMI showed as 25.
Out of shape for who is the question. Normal range for men is around 20%, about 5% higher for women IIRC from my weight lifting days.