Whats the 4000 series bring to the table and when

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
i AM going to wait and see ... for me, it has always been "bang for buck" ... if GX2 is $450 i am all over it .. if it is $650 and "only" has +33% improvement over my rig or an Ultra, forget it ... :p

my rig is "fine" for playing DX10 games at 16x10
["sweet 16" :heart:]

... i just want "better" ... IF i can get it for ~$500 [-$350 for my current setup]

GX2 has to "impress" me to even buy and/or keep it
--or it IS "worth waiting" for r700 for my situation

otoh, if i had a *single* 2900xt [with no upgrade path that i took with Xfire] .. i might be getting really "desperate" about now. ;)
I've just gotta chime in here, without knowing your financial situation whatsoever...

I really think you should wait until the next major generation of GPUs before you upgrade. You currently have two current-gen upper-midrange cards.

What's the rest of your rig like? What CPU are you using?

Really if you're intent on doing anything with your current setup, the only thing I would consider would be a pair of 9600GTs as you may in fact come close to breaking even (and you'll cut down on your power consumption/heat output).

Essentially I'm saying that for you it's "worth waiting" for R700/G200 no matter what (almost). :Q

:beer:

the rest of my rig is in my sig ... did i really hide it in plain sight that well? :p

C2D E4300@3.25 Ghz | VT HD2900xt/Sapphire 2900Pro | Gigabyte P35-DS3P | OCZ 850w | 2x250GB Seagate 10.2 SATA/WD 120.0 GB IDE | Corsair XMS2/OCZ 2 x 2GB PC6400 | Philips SATA DVD-RW | Thermalright Ultra-120/Scythe S-FLEX SFF21F | . . . Samsung 205BW 20"@1680x1050/ACER AL1917w | Samsung A437 DUN/AT&T Wireless 'net | 2GB Flash | Vista-32 Home Premium/WinXP-32 | 13090 3DMark06

what *i* am trying to say .... those of US with roughly "ultra" performance ... have very LITTLE reason to upgrade for $650 unless it is *significant*
-better then 2 GTs in SLi might make it worthwhile ... in my opinion

if you are coming from a 7900GTX, it is probably a well deserved and very bang-for-buck upgrade .. that is, IF you are coming from 7900GTX :p

:D
edit ... now IF the GX2 were really ~$500, most of us would upgrade
-but then nvidia probably has a limited run if they are gonna charge so damn much
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: apoppin
if you are coming from a 7900GTX, it is probably a well deserved and very bang-for-buck upgrade .. IF you are coming from 7900GTX :p

:D
At $600, I don't see it having much bang-for-the-buck (if any!).

As far as your rig goes, I would get a new HDD with the new 320/334gb platters (WD or Samsung, take your pick). Then I would install Vista-64 on it.

After that, I would go to a market to buy a piggy bank. You need to save up for a big-screen TV. :p
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
if you are coming from a 7900GTX, it is probably a well deserved and very bang-for-buck upgrade .. IF you are coming from 7900GTX :p

:D
At $600, I don't see it having much bang-for-the-buck (if any!).

As far as your rig goes, I would get a new HDD with the new 320/334gb platters (WD or Samsung, take your pick). Then I would install Vista-64 on it.

After that, I would go to a market to buy a piggy bank. You need to save up for a big-screen TV. :p

Why do i want Vista 64 - now? ... it is currently SLOWER in 99.9% of games than Vista 32 ... i uninstalled it last week :p

Next year Big TV LCDs will be half price .. or less
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: apoppin
Next year Big TV LCDs will be half price .. or less
All the more reason to invest in that piggy bank. :D

That happens every year BTW.

Oh, as for Vista-64: You can use more memory! It can't be that much slower than Vista-32...

I think you should go for the HDD. Maybe you could try the 250gb drives in RAID just for fun.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
Next year Big TV LCDs will be half price .. or less
All the more reason to invest in that piggy bank. :D

That happens every year BTW.

Oh, as for Vista-64: You can use more memory! It can't be that much slower than Vista-32...
you don't really know much about it do you? :p

catch up .. i did a lot of work - just for you :)

Vista32- vs. Vista64-bit OS Showdown *Done!*

i used a 4GB gaming rig and also posted some CrossFire numbers ... Vista 64 is OK - no issues whatsoever - but if you are a performance whore like me, i think 32bit is the best way for right now.

and i HAD my 250 GB Seagates in RAID-0 .. the supposed performance increase is overstated for gamers ... i am waiting for solid state 1TB drives for a real upgrade

rose.gif
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: apoppin
you don't really know much about it do you? :p

catch up .. i did a lot of work - just for you :)
Actually you didn't...I use an nVidia graphics card. :Q

From the look of it, you gained a bit in 32-bit mode but nothing overly impressive.

I was under the impression that XP and Vista (32/64) were all pretty much at parity at this point, driver-wise (with XP being a tiny bit quicker).
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
you don't really know much about it do you? :p

catch up .. i did a lot of work - just for you :)
Actually you didn't...I use an nVidia graphics card. :Q

From the look of it, you gained a bit in 32-bit mode but nothing overly impressive.

I was under the impression that XP and Vista (32/64) were all pretty much at parity at this point, driver-wise (with XP being a tiny bit quicker).
Yes, remember the benchmarking we did back - in May '07? .. there was parity back then between Vista-32 and XP-32 with both my 2900xt and my 8800GTS-640oc
... and What does having a nvidia GPU have to do with running a 64-bit OS?
:confused:

i am only stating my own personal and possibly peculiar to you, reasons why Vista 32 stays and Vista 64 is getting the boot [off]

Only two game i already played - one ancient, one new - actually benefit under a 64-bit OS - obviously 64-bit games - FC and Hg:L

when Crysis is finally optimized, it will also run about 20% or so faster than 32-bit ... and in 3 years, when i upgrade to MS' next 64-bit OS, games will hopefully be routinely ported and/or written for 64-bit so unlike today.

If you noticed, my BlueTooth device still only has unsigned drivers :p