• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Whats the 4000 series bring to the table and when

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
i AM going to wait and see ... for me, it has always been "bang for buck" ... if GX2 is $450 i am all over it .. if it is $650 and "only" has +33% improvement over my rig or an Ultra, forget it ... :p

my rig is "fine" for playing DX10 games at 16x10
["sweet 16" :heart:]

... i just want "better" ... IF i can get it for ~$500 [-$350 for my current setup]

GX2 has to "impress" me to even buy and/or keep it
--or it IS "worth waiting" for r700 for my situation

otoh, if i had a *single* 2900xt [with no upgrade path that i took with Xfire] .. i might be getting really "desperate" about now. ;)
I've just gotta chime in here, without knowing your financial situation whatsoever...

I really think you should wait until the next major generation of GPUs before you upgrade. You currently have two current-gen upper-midrange cards.

What's the rest of your rig like? What CPU are you using?

Really if you're intent on doing anything with your current setup, the only thing I would consider would be a pair of 9600GTs as you may in fact come close to breaking even (and you'll cut down on your power consumption/heat output).

Essentially I'm saying that for you it's "worth waiting" for R700/G200 no matter what (almost). :Q

:beer:

the rest of my rig is in my sig ... did i really hide it in plain sight that well? :p

C2D E4300@3.25 Ghz | VT HD2900xt/Sapphire 2900Pro | Gigabyte P35-DS3P | OCZ 850w | 2x250GB Seagate 10.2 SATA/WD 120.0 GB IDE | Corsair XMS2/OCZ 2 x 2GB PC6400 | Philips SATA DVD-RW | Thermalright Ultra-120/Scythe S-FLEX SFF21F | . . . Samsung 205BW 20"@1680x1050/ACER AL1917w | Samsung A437 DUN/AT&T Wireless 'net | 2GB Flash | Vista-32 Home Premium/WinXP-32 | 13090 3DMark06

what *i* am trying to say .... those of US with roughly "ultra" performance ... have very LITTLE reason to upgrade for $650 unless it is *significant*
-better then 2 GTs in SLi might make it worthwhile ... in my opinion

if you are coming from a 7900GTX, it is probably a well deserved and very bang-for-buck upgrade .. that is, IF you are coming from 7900GTX :p

:D
edit ... now IF the GX2 were really ~$500, most of us would upgrade
-but then nvidia probably has a limited run if they are gonna charge so damn much
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: apoppin
if you are coming from a 7900GTX, it is probably a well deserved and very bang-for-buck upgrade .. IF you are coming from 7900GTX :p

:D
At $600, I don't see it having much bang-for-the-buck (if any!).

As far as your rig goes, I would get a new HDD with the new 320/334gb platters (WD or Samsung, take your pick). Then I would install Vista-64 on it.

After that, I would go to a market to buy a piggy bank. You need to save up for a big-screen TV. :p
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
if you are coming from a 7900GTX, it is probably a well deserved and very bang-for-buck upgrade .. IF you are coming from 7900GTX :p

:D
At $600, I don't see it having much bang-for-the-buck (if any!).

As far as your rig goes, I would get a new HDD with the new 320/334gb platters (WD or Samsung, take your pick). Then I would install Vista-64 on it.

After that, I would go to a market to buy a piggy bank. You need to save up for a big-screen TV. :p

Why do i want Vista 64 - now? ... it is currently SLOWER in 99.9% of games than Vista 32 ... i uninstalled it last week :p

Next year Big TV LCDs will be half price .. or less
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: apoppin
Next year Big TV LCDs will be half price .. or less
All the more reason to invest in that piggy bank. :D

That happens every year BTW.

Oh, as for Vista-64: You can use more memory! It can't be that much slower than Vista-32...

I think you should go for the HDD. Maybe you could try the 250gb drives in RAID just for fun.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
Next year Big TV LCDs will be half price .. or less
All the more reason to invest in that piggy bank. :D

That happens every year BTW.

Oh, as for Vista-64: You can use more memory! It can't be that much slower than Vista-32...
you don't really know much about it do you? :p

catch up .. i did a lot of work - just for you :)

Vista32- vs. Vista64-bit OS Showdown *Done!*

i used a 4GB gaming rig and also posted some CrossFire numbers ... Vista 64 is OK - no issues whatsoever - but if you are a performance whore like me, i think 32bit is the best way for right now.

and i HAD my 250 GB Seagates in RAID-0 .. the supposed performance increase is overstated for gamers ... i am waiting for solid state 1TB drives for a real upgrade

rose.gif
 

SickBeast

Lifer
Jul 21, 2000
14,377
19
81
Originally posted by: apoppin
you don't really know much about it do you? :p

catch up .. i did a lot of work - just for you :)
Actually you didn't...I use an nVidia graphics card. :Q

From the look of it, you gained a bit in 32-bit mode but nothing overly impressive.

I was under the impression that XP and Vista (32/64) were all pretty much at parity at this point, driver-wise (with XP being a tiny bit quicker).
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: apoppin
you don't really know much about it do you? :p

catch up .. i did a lot of work - just for you :)
Actually you didn't...I use an nVidia graphics card. :Q

From the look of it, you gained a bit in 32-bit mode but nothing overly impressive.

I was under the impression that XP and Vista (32/64) were all pretty much at parity at this point, driver-wise (with XP being a tiny bit quicker).
Yes, remember the benchmarking we did back - in May '07? .. there was parity back then between Vista-32 and XP-32 with both my 2900xt and my 8800GTS-640oc
... and What does having a nvidia GPU have to do with running a 64-bit OS?
:confused:

i am only stating my own personal and possibly peculiar to you, reasons why Vista 32 stays and Vista 64 is getting the boot [off]

Only two game i already played - one ancient, one new - actually benefit under a 64-bit OS - obviously 64-bit games - FC and Hg:L

when Crysis is finally optimized, it will also run about 20% or so faster than 32-bit ... and in 3 years, when i upgrade to MS' next 64-bit OS, games will hopefully be routinely ported and/or written for 64-bit so unlike today.

If you noticed, my BlueTooth device still only has unsigned drivers :p