Originally posted by: Czar
newest unconfirmed number of dead is 42
Where are you getting this #? (just curious) CNN says 2.
Originally posted by: Czar
newest unconfirmed number of dead is 42
Originally posted by: irwincur
Irwin, have you read the Bible too?
Yes, and it is no where near as violent as the Qu'ran.
Actually, if you remove the violence and pure hatred from the Qu'ran, you pretty much just have a re-written Bible.
It is not a friendly religions by any means, nor does it really advocate joining the modern world. As long as there are traditionalists, there will be problems...
You're a goddamned idiot if you think this would not be the case if the christians were living in the middle east.
Originally posted by: NJDevil
Originally posted by: Czar
newest unconfirmed number of dead is 42
Where are you getting this #? (just curious) CNN says 2.
Originally posted by: conjur
:QOriginally posted by: Czar
newest unconfirmed number of dead is 42
![]()
What about the Torah? Have you read that? Should we "change" Judaism because their traditionalists don't want to join the modern world?
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.conjur.com/blog/2005/07/07/terror-attack-on-londons-underground/
It appears that up to seven Underground (London's subway system) stops were targeted. Casualties galore (at least 90 reported at one station alone with two fatalities reported). This is all very preliminary but it's obviously an orchestrated attack. Some of the stops included Liverpool, Aldgate, and Kings Cross. There are reports of people still trapped in the Tube and the national morning news shows keep showing looped footage of survivors receiving assistance.
Footage has also been shown of the top of one of London's famous double-decker buses having been destroyed by an explosion.
Now, whether the attack was timed to coincide with the opening of the G8 today or whether Paris, London, Madrid, NYC, etc. were going to be hit one day after the announcement of the location of the 2012 Olympics is also unclear.
What is clear, though, is that the fvcking BS rhetoric from this admin that "America and the world are safer" is now completely and utterly without basis. Attacks like this will continue no matter what countries are invaded and no matter what sanctions are imposed upon others. There will always be a fringe element seeking to cause death and destruction.
Better security at home at ports, chemical plants, transportation hubs, trucking industry, etc. is what we need, not more bombs and bullets.
Here's an early report from CNN:
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/07/london.tube/index.html
Originally posted by: irwincur
You're a goddamned idiot if you think this would not be the case if the christians were living in the middle east.
What are you talking about?
Christianity has for the most part been able to rationally reign in the traditionalists and extremists in its ranks. Yes, there is an outlier every now and then, but the church did go through pains to directly attack this problem. This occured a few decades ago, and it has been working.
Originally posted by: irwincur
You're a goddamned idiot if you think this would not be the case if the christians were living in the middle east.
What are you talking about?
Christianity has for the most part been able to rationally reign in the traditionalists and extremists in its ranks. Yes, there is an outlier every now and then, but the church did go through pains to directly attack this problem. This occured a few decades ago, and it has been working.
Islam could be as flexible, but no one wants to change it at all. Here is the problem. As the world advances, the Middle East (and Africa) will be left behind, not because they do not have the resources, but because their traditionalist religion is indeed holding them back. The ME has sat on vasts amounts of wealth, enough to make every man, woman, and child filthy rich - yet it all sits in the hands of their leadership - and in their religious leadership.
I suspect that if there were Christians in the ME, the world would be a different place. As a matter of fact, there are plenty of them, and surprisingly, even though they are an abused minority, we never see them act like barbarians.
Wow. You don't even realize how idiotic that statement is.Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.conjur.com/blog/2005/07/07/terror-attack-on-londons-underground/
It appears that up to seven Underground (London's subway system) stops were targeted. Casualties galore (at least 90 reported at one station alone with two fatalities reported). This is all very preliminary but it's obviously an orchestrated attack. Some of the stops included Liverpool, Aldgate, and Kings Cross. There are reports of people still trapped in the Tube and the national morning news shows keep showing looped footage of survivors receiving assistance.
Footage has also been shown of the top of one of London's famous double-decker buses having been destroyed by an explosion.
Now, whether the attack was timed to coincide with the opening of the G8 today or whether Paris, London, Madrid, NYC, etc. were going to be hit one day after the announcement of the location of the 2012 Olympics is also unclear.
What is clear, though, is that the fvcking BS rhetoric from this admin that "America and the world are safer" is now completely and utterly without basis. Attacks like this will continue no matter what countries are invaded and no matter what sanctions are imposed upon others. There will always be a fringe element seeking to cause death and destruction.
Better security at home at ports, chemical plants, transportation hubs, trucking industry, etc. is what we need, not more bombs and bullets.
Here's an early report from CNN:
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/07/london.tube/index.html
This very easily could have been in New York. America IS safer.
Originally posted by: irwincur
OMG; what a cool number.
What exactly do you mean by this?
Originally posted by: irwincur
OMG; what a cool number.
What exactly do you mean by this?
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: conjur
http://www.conjur.com/blog/2005/07/07/terror-attack-on-londons-underground/
It appears that up to seven Underground (London's subway system) stops were targeted. Casualties galore (at least 90 reported at one station alone with two fatalities reported). This is all very preliminary but it's obviously an orchestrated attack. Some of the stops included Liverpool, Aldgate, and Kings Cross. There are reports of people still trapped in the Tube and the national morning news shows keep showing looped footage of survivors receiving assistance.
Footage has also been shown of the top of one of London's famous double-decker buses having been destroyed by an explosion.
Now, whether the attack was timed to coincide with the opening of the G8 today or whether Paris, London, Madrid, NYC, etc. were going to be hit one day after the announcement of the location of the 2012 Olympics is also unclear.
What is clear, though, is that the fvcking BS rhetoric from this admin that "America and the world are safer" is now completely and utterly without basis. Attacks like this will continue no matter what countries are invaded and no matter what sanctions are imposed upon others. There will always be a fringe element seeking to cause death and destruction.
Better security at home at ports, chemical plants, transportation hubs, trucking industry, etc. is what we need, not more bombs and bullets.
Here's an early report from CNN:
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/07/07/london.tube/index.html
This very easily could have been in New York. America IS safer.
I think he was referring to "42"...Douglas Adams? Hitchiker's Guide?Originally posted by: irwincur
OMG; what a cool number.
What exactly do you mean by this?
Originally posted by: zendari
This very easily could have been in New York. America IS safer.
A few decades ago???
Originally posted by: BBond
Originally posted by: zendari
This very easily could have been in New York. America IS safer.
And Blue Bonnet is half the price of the high priced spread.
Originally posted by: conjur
I think he was referring to "42"...Douglas Adams? Hitchiker's Guide?Originally posted by: irwincur
OMG; what a cool number.
What exactly do you mean by this?
Still...a misplaced emotion in this thread.
Every life is priceless. And, when a life is snuffed so unexpectedly like this, it hits the world harder. Perhaps that's a sad indictment as to how we've become desensitized to the starvation and oppression in many other parts of the world.Originally posted by: Forsythe
I see what you mean. But in a world were alone 30.00 chrildren die every day, just from starvation. And millions die every year from aids.Originally posted by: conjur
I think he was referring to "42"...Douglas Adams? Hitchiker's Guide?Originally posted by: irwincur
OMG; what a cool number.
What exactly do you mean by this?
Still...a misplaced emotion in this thread.
You expect me to care about 100 or even 10.000 deaths?
[i keep forgetting zero's]
