Originally posted by: Electric Amish
There seriously cannot be any real difference between a $200 (or less) and a $1000 watch.
You obviously have more money than you know what to do with.
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
There seriously cannot be any real difference between a $200 (or less) and a $1000 watch.
You obviously have more money than you know what to do with.
Just like there is no difference between a $10000 car and a $40000 one?
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
There seriously cannot be any real difference between a $200 (or less) and a $1000 watch.
You obviously have more money than you know what to do with.
Just like there is no difference between a $10000 car and a $40000 one?
Correct. I would contend that there is no difference in the basic functionality between a $10k and a $40k car.
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
There seriously cannot be any real difference between a $200 (or less) and a $1000 watch.
You obviously have more money than you know what to do with.
Just like there is no difference between a $10000 car and a $40000 one?
Correct. I would contend that there is no difference in the basic functionality between a $10k and a $40k car.
So why do they exist?
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
There seriously cannot be any real difference between a $200 (or less) and a $1000 watch.
You obviously have more money than you know what to do with.
Just like there is no difference between a $10000 car and a $40000 one?
Correct. I would contend that there is no difference in the basic functionality between a $10k and a $40k car.
So why do they exist?
Because there are people in the world with more money than brains.
It's also not really a fair comparison between an apparatus that tells time and one used for transportation.
Telling time is basically telling time.
Transportation has many facets (e.g. comfort, speed, economy, etc.)
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Because there are people in the world with more money than brains.
It's also not really a fair comparison between an apparatus that tells time and one used for transportation.
Telling time is basically telling time.
Transportation has many facets (e.g. comfort, speed, economy, etc.)
Originally posted by: Spooner
I think my range would be of the Movado, Rado, Tag Haeur, Bulova type brands.
Price range $600-1,000
Any thoughts/suggestions?
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
There seriously cannot be any real difference between a $200 (or less) and a $1000 watch.
You obviously have more money than you know what to do with.
Just like there is no difference between a $10000 car and a $40000 one?
Correct. I would contend that there is no difference in the basic functionality between a $10k and a $40k car.
So why do they exist?
Because there are people in the world with more money than brains.
It's also not really a fair comparison between an apparatus that tells time and one used for transportation.
Telling time is basically telling time.
Transportation has many facets (e.g. comfort, speed, economy, etc.)
Originally posted by: Spooner
I really wasn't looking to get into a "expensive vs. non-expensive" watch discussion. I was given an award from work and would like to spend it on a nice watch, and as people have mentioned in this thread it's more about style and luxury than precision
Originally posted by: Descartes
Here are some vintage watches near your price range.
Stylistically, that might not be the type of thing you want, but imo it's more interesting than just your normal out-of-the-box watch.