mutantmagnet
Member
- Apr 6, 2009
- 41
- 1
- 71
Microsoft
Continue on their plans for making a device agnostic OS. People want a seamless experience when using their devices. This idea in general should also be adopted by Apple and Google.
For Microsoft specifically they should ensure their OS also has a means of working with normal cellphones. Before I switched to smartphone I noticed that MS had offered the best experience with Bing on low end phones. They really have the potential to spread their presence into the 3rd world countries which are the fastest growing economies. It will pay off a lot in 20 years if they got people from those countries hooked onto their applications by catering to their software needs.
Intel
Develop a microkernal OS. We live in age where security is in higher demand and will continue to grow. Microkernals were abandoned for consumer usage because the hardware requirements were too high, in 2000-2005. At this point Intel has the justification and resources to offer a compelling alternative to Windows and Linux while still serving the needs of the public. Intel should take note that their biggest market is going to be Europe and potentially China at the start but the Americas will follow suit quickly if they prove they can offer bundled free software that makes the cost of buying a new OS and CPU worthwhile.
Intel also should adopt both gsync and adaptive sync.
AMD
They are in a bad position because they're financially starved. IMO AMD is right to bet big on VR but they shouldn't focus only on the hardware aspect. They should meddle in the affairs of the software developers and make sure they are making productivity products that will make VR as essential as the PC used to be in the 90s.
Nvidia
Convince Intel to adopt gsync. Have gsync work all the way down to 24 Hertz so they are fully compatible with movies and market adaptive refreshed displays as a must have feature.
Leverage their resources to develop a new type of CPU/GPU hybrid that allows for easier artifical intelligence programming. I want Nvidia to play the much longer investment game than AMD needs to do with VR.
Asus/MSI/Gigabyte/ASrock
I would like it if any of them differentiated their motherboards by:
Offering a multigpu configuration with integrated GPUs and dedicated cards that scaled well. At the very least offer an option where the IGPU can take over the processing (and maybe the rendering) of everything that is UI related including our player characters.
Offering a way to save custom memory overclocking profiles based on an application we are using. In addition use a networking system like evolved that allows people to share memory overclocking settings so we can collectively find the optimal timings.
Creating the ability to divide the audio channels up to 3 distinct output channels that don't interfere with each other.
Continue on their plans for making a device agnostic OS. People want a seamless experience when using their devices. This idea in general should also be adopted by Apple and Google.
For Microsoft specifically they should ensure their OS also has a means of working with normal cellphones. Before I switched to smartphone I noticed that MS had offered the best experience with Bing on low end phones. They really have the potential to spread their presence into the 3rd world countries which are the fastest growing economies. It will pay off a lot in 20 years if they got people from those countries hooked onto their applications by catering to their software needs.
Intel
Develop a microkernal OS. We live in age where security is in higher demand and will continue to grow. Microkernals were abandoned for consumer usage because the hardware requirements were too high, in 2000-2005. At this point Intel has the justification and resources to offer a compelling alternative to Windows and Linux while still serving the needs of the public. Intel should take note that their biggest market is going to be Europe and potentially China at the start but the Americas will follow suit quickly if they prove they can offer bundled free software that makes the cost of buying a new OS and CPU worthwhile.
Intel also should adopt both gsync and adaptive sync.
AMD
They are in a bad position because they're financially starved. IMO AMD is right to bet big on VR but they shouldn't focus only on the hardware aspect. They should meddle in the affairs of the software developers and make sure they are making productivity products that will make VR as essential as the PC used to be in the 90s.
Nvidia
Convince Intel to adopt gsync. Have gsync work all the way down to 24 Hertz so they are fully compatible with movies and market adaptive refreshed displays as a must have feature.
Leverage their resources to develop a new type of CPU/GPU hybrid that allows for easier artifical intelligence programming. I want Nvidia to play the much longer investment game than AMD needs to do with VR.
Asus/MSI/Gigabyte/ASrock
I would like it if any of them differentiated their motherboards by:
Offering a multigpu configuration with integrated GPUs and dedicated cards that scaled well. At the very least offer an option where the IGPU can take over the processing (and maybe the rendering) of everything that is UI related including our player characters.
Offering a way to save custom memory overclocking profiles based on an application we are using. In addition use a networking system like evolved that allows people to share memory overclocking settings so we can collectively find the optimal timings.
Creating the ability to divide the audio channels up to 3 distinct output channels that don't interfere with each other.