I'm a fan of aggressive containment. It worked for the USSR. Sure Islam is different but ultimately to harm the West, Muslims have to have to actually cross borders and oceans. We need to let muslims have dominion over their backwards corner of the world. The downside is we might have access to less oil, but that is something we have to come to terms with anyway. "We" fight muslims in proxy wars in border areas like Chechnya, Bosnia-Herz and sub-saharan Africa to let them know they can't expand without a fight.
I think the policy of engagement we have right now is unlikely to work and involves greater risk. Like with the USSR, there is more likely to be change if we let them collapse / fester from within as opposed to our current policy of intervention.
I think the policy of engagement we have right now is unlikely to work and involves greater risk. Like with the USSR, there is more likely to be change if we let them collapse / fester from within as opposed to our current policy of intervention.