What salary could you be happy with?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

LunarRay

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2003
9,993
1
76
Quote by Hector13

tell me about it. I had to give mr. bloomberg a fat > $3000 check for taxes a couple weeks back. This is the new york city tax! on top of federal and state taxes![/quote]

Geez... where else is the city gonna get the bucks to provide all the service you get... Why when I was a youth in NYC I couldn't wait to grow up so I could support the pot hole fixer guys.. six to fill in some asphalt... ;)
 

rh71

No Lifer
Aug 28, 2001
52,844
1,049
126
Originally posted by: HJD1
Quote by Hector13

tell me about it. I had to give mr. bloomberg a fat > $3000 check for taxes a couple weeks back. This is the new york city tax! on top of federal and state taxes!

Geez... where else is the city gonna get the bucks to provide all the service you get... Why when I was a youth in NYC I couldn't wait to grow up so I could support the pot hole fixer guys.. six to fill in some asphalt... ;)[/quote]BullSh!t... there are more potholes in NYC than there are whores (sorry for being blunt). They ain't doing squat with that money they get from taxes. BTW, Hector... if you claim correctly on that form when you first got hired, you wouldn't be hit so hard all at once. ;)
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
The divisions are much to small. Many familys make over 100K and are flat broke and unhappy.

In california an average home is 500K in a good area so figure a lot of that 100K is chewed up mortgage and taxes and income taxes.

Good income in Ca is 150K. Usually two making around 75K.

As moonie said I would be happier living on investments and fishing for barracuda all day.
 

thirtythree

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2001
8,680
3
0
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
The divisions are much to small. Many familys make over 100K and are flat broke and unhappy.

In california an average home is 500K in a good area so figure a lot of that 100K is chewed up mortgage and taxes and income taxes.

Good income in Ca is 150K. Usually two making around 75K.

As moonie said I would be happier living on investments and fishing for barracuda all day.
Sorry, I couldn't think of a better way to do it. I've never really lived anywhere with an insane cost of living .. at least I'm pretty sure Oklahoma, Kansas, Las Vegas or Utah wouldn't qualify.
 

Mill

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
28,558
3
81
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
The divisions are much to small. Many familys make over 100K and are flat broke and unhappy.

In california an average home is 500K in a good area so figure a lot of that 100K is chewed up mortgage and taxes and income taxes.

Good income in Ca is 150K. Usually two making around 75K.

As moonie said I would be happier living on investments and fishing for barracuda all day.

Then WTF would you live in Cali? I am baffled.
 

flxnimprtmscl

Diamond Member
Jan 30, 2003
7,962
2
0
>$100,000. I'm unable to be happy with how much money I have no matter how much I make. If I had Bill Gates type money I'd still be pissed cause I didn't have enough to buy my own country yet. Kinda sucks sometimes....
 

thirtythree

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2001
8,680
3
0
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
>$100,000. I'm unable to be happy with how much money I have no matter how much I make. If I had Bill Gates type money I'd still be pissed cause I didn't have enough to buy my own country yet. Kinda sucks sometimes....
Yes it does.
 

shopbruin

Diamond Member
Jul 12, 2000
5,817
0
0
Originally posted by: Millennium
Originally posted by: Carbonyl
The divisions are much to small. Many familys make over 100K and are flat broke and unhappy.

In california an average home is 500K in a good area so figure a lot of that 100K is chewed up mortgage and taxes and income taxes.

Good income in Ca is 150K. Usually two making around 75K.

As moonie said I would be happier living on investments and fishing for barracuda all day.

Then WTF would you live in Cali? I am baffled.

because i've lived here all my life and i don't want to leave anytime soon. i like it too much and leaving would probably devastate me, unless i'm moving somewhere with a very assured financial future/career.

cost of living has skyrocketed in the last what, ten years?

that amount is to live comfortable. to just live you can do so with a lot less. no suburbs, good schools, nice cars, etc.
 

hdeck

Lifer
Sep 26, 2002
14,530
1
0
this implies that money = happiness and that's not always the case. in many places you can comfortably live in the situation you posted on a salary of under $60k. in others it would take more. but honestly i don't see the need in having +100k to live comfortably; to live wealthy, yes it would be nice.
 

amdskip

Lifer
Jan 6, 2001
22,530
13
81
My dad makes around 45k which is plenty for us. We live in a small town (4500 people) in Illinois.

I made 12k last year working while going to school.
 

thirtythree

Diamond Member
Aug 7, 2001
8,680
3
0
Originally posted by: hdeck
this implies that money = happiness and that's not always the case.
I know money doesn't = happiness. That's why I clarified what was meant by "happy" in my original post. I think there are so many votes for > $100k because a lot of people do believe that though. Or perhaps no one is reading my original post before voting .. I doubt that many people live in areas like NYC or Cali. Oh well.
in many places you can comfortably live in the situation you posted on a salary of under $60k. in others it would take more.
Speaking of which, are there any sites that give relative cost of living for different locations?
 

Walleye

Banned
Dec 1, 2002
7,939
0
0
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
The kids want a college education: >$100,000.
The kids turn out as stupid as their father: $60,000-80,000.

my father isnt stupid... nor is my mother... or brother or sister...

every single one of them has a masters or a bachelors... working towards a masters... all of em from respectable colleges...


it means i have a hell of a legacy to fulfill... gotta finish college :p
 

LeeTJ

Diamond Member
Jan 21, 2003
4,899
0
0
hmmm

i have a house, 2 cars, 3 kids and i'm living in NJ. We figured out monthly expenses exceeded 7K per month, so ya, put me in the >100k club.
 

Cyberian

Diamond Member
Jun 17, 2000
9,999
1
0
Originally posted by: Deslocke
Originally posted by: hdeck
this implies that money = happiness and that's not always the case.
I know money doesn't = happiness. That's why I clarified what was meant by "happy" in my original post. I think there are so many votes for > $100k because a lot of people do believe that though. Or perhaps no one is reading my original post before voting .. I doubt that many people live in areas like NYC or Cali. Oh well.
in many places you can comfortably live in the situation you posted on a salary of under $60k. in others it would take more.
Speaking of which, are there any sites that give relative cost of living for different locations?
Here's one -

Text
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
I could live fine w/ 40k-60k. I wouldn't have a whole lot, but definitely would be somehwhat comfortable. And abou what wingznut said, I totally agree. While I am young, I still see the need to enjoy what you do, since you spend 8 hrs, 5 days a week, at least 48wks a year of your life doing it. That is an awful lot of time to spend and not enoy what you're doing.
 

LongCoolMother

Diamond Member
Sep 4, 2001
5,675
0
0
100,000+ only then would i be satisfied. well, i mean, thats how much id want to make when im say...into my 30s?
 

Hector13

Golden Member
Apr 4, 2000
1,694
0
0
Originally posted by: rh71
BTW, Hector... if you claim correctly on that form when you first got hired, you wouldn't be hit so hard all at once. ;)

so instead I would have paid the city over the course of a year and in effect have given them a interest free loan for 12 months? Some how that doesn't seem any better to me.
 

m2kewl

Diamond Member
Oct 7, 2001
8,263
0
0
Originally posted by: Hector13
Originally posted by: rh71 BTW, Hector... if you claim correctly on that form when you first got hired, you wouldn't be hit so hard all at once. ;)
so instead I would have paid the city over the course of a year and in effect have given them a interest free loan for 12 months? Some how that doesn't seem any better to me.

that's why i owe irs every year, i hate providing the govt free interest on my $$$ :|