brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 29,833
- 30,602
- 136
Like what is your argument here?It's a matter of self governance.
Like what is your argument here?It's a matter of self governance.
Split off just the government areas of DC and just make the non-government areas (the majority of DC) a state. It has more population than Wyoming and Vermont. PR would be the 32 most populous state.I don't want DC or PR to become states. DC was set up independent of any state control for a reason...and PR...just cut them loose. Let them become their own country again.
Well...they are all kind of tropical...Are you sure that isn't coconutitution?
By that logic, yes, they should all get a say, which is what you said. Americans should have a say. They are Americans. Ergo, they should get a say.
That we could easily cut them loose...let them govern themselves.Like what is your argument here?
mehConsider it...it's about 1,000 miles from Miami to San Juan...with Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Turks and Caicos, and the Bahamas in between. There's zero reason that PR should be associated with the USA. (similarly, Hawaii is ~2400 miles from California...but they at least have a strategic location.
The old farts really need to stay out of the DC discussion.![]()
Consider it...it's about 1,000 miles from Miami to San Juan...with Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Turks and Caicos, and the Bahamas in between. There's zero reason that PR should be associated with the USA. (similarly, Hawaii is ~2400 miles from California...but they at least have a strategic location.
Sounds like a good plan.Puerto Rico is a US territory. By the same logic, ALL US terrorltories should become states.
American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico are all US territories, but PR and the Mariana Islands also have their own constitution.
DC should reclaim its territory illegally occupied by Virginia.agree. The modern reality of DC simply does not grok with the general concept of fair and equal representation. At the very least, getting Congress out of the business of local politics should have happened decades ago.
though the old fucks are right about one thing: statehood for DC requires a constitutional amendment as far as I understand it. This is...a very difficult thing to accomplish.
Seriously, distance from the US isn't a valid argument as long as Hawaii and Alaska are still parts of the US.OK so what about Alaska?
Hawai'i?
Why not just make it a state?Abolish DC as it currently is configured. Split the city of DC among the two states like the KCs.
You do know the two KCs were founded at different times and always were distinct political entities?Abolish DC as it currently is configured. Split the city of DC among the two states like the KCs.
Because it isn't a state. It can't be a state legally. The way for residents to get 'full rights' is to absorb them into MD or VA and leave the Federal Lands under Federal authority.Why not just make it a state?
Kind of a laughable response given your approach.^^^ Look at the reason DC was created.
This is... not true.Because it isn't a state. It can't be a state legally. The way for residents to get 'full rights' is to absorb them into MD or VA and leave the Federal Lands under Federal authority.
Be hard to separate government areas and where people live in DC. People, not land, are who should be represented.Split off just the government areas of DC and just make the non-government areas (the majority of DC) a state. It has more population than Wyoming and Vermont. PR would be the 32 most populous state.