K1052
Elite Member
- Aug 21, 2003
- 52,754
- 46,531
- 136
Originally posted by: kogase
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: kogase
the idea that owning a gun is a necessity because somehow people are going to "stand up" to the army of a tyranical government is laughable at best. This isn't 1776, the people don't stand a chance anymore.
Really? Tell that to the former USSR, who got their asses kicked by the Taliban who used little more than small privately owned arms.
The Vietnam War demonstrated that a modern nuclear military power can be resisted by guerrilla fighters bearing only small arms.
In 1992, the United States declined to intervene in the conflict in Bosnia-Herzegovina after an aide to General Colin Powell, then Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, advised the Senate Armed Services Committee that the widespread ownership of arms in the former Yugoslav republic made even limited intervention "perilous and deadly."
Switzerland managed to stay safe through two world wars. It was not their neutrality that kept Hitler out, but the fact that the citizen militia of Switzerland has just about every home armed. No one has dared invade Switzerland since this militia was formed.
Even now, the Russians are having their asses handed to them by the Chechnyans... fighters who live at home, wear jeans and use castoff weapons.
That you think an armed populace is not a deterrent to invasion or oppression is what is laughable here.
Something of a deterrent? Maybe. A big one, probably not. Our army grows larger and more powerful every day (not to mention technologically advanced), with the amount of spending and research that goes into it. Eventually it will be just be too powerful for a few citizens armed with AK47s to take on.
There are a couple hundred million firearms in private possession in the United States, the vast majority being unregistered.
