Originally posted by: cr4zymofo
Originally posted by: sxr7171
Are you suggesting that the car/tranny wasn't built to be used at it's true potential? What's the point of having a VTEC engine if you can't drive it in the range where you can actually get its rated output. I'm not a big fan of Honda but I think they're a quality company that wouldn't mate a good engine with an under-rated tranny. I drive my car without any regard for stuff like that because I know it was built for driving (10 year, 120,000 mile drivetrain warranty).
No... not that at all, because any cars will be fux0r up if you drive it under worse than severe condition. Not only that, I know of three cars that have or had transmission problems, and yes, they're all Hondas.
True, but shifting at red line is not severe conditions in my book. Shifting at red line before the engine is warmed up is really bad, but once the engine is heated up it should be perfectly fine coming close to red line.
As for tranny problems, I know that maximum torque on those engines was around 120-125 ft-lbs and the tranny should be rated to handle that torque at whatever RPM the engine is running at. Sure trannys go bad, but it seems like these are not stock vehicles that these issues are happening to. I don't know what shifting at high rpms should do to a tranny other than put some extra wear and tear on it.
I think the only redeeming feature of an Integra is the fact that you can use that rejuvenation of torque at a higher rpm, otherwise it would totally suck. If you don't use that 2nd cam, then why not get a regular civic or any other econobox.