QFT - Congress can screw up more than one thing simultaneously. It is much more efficient than screwing things up one at a time.![]()
What's there to "fight" BP about? We all agree we'd like to see the problem fixed. We all know BP is concerned about it's bottom line, so it's doing whatever it can to stop the profits from leaking out. What else is there to talk about?
Just out of curiosity if we shut down BP, liquidate all their assets, lock all their management and above employees in Federal prison for the remainder of their lives exactly how will that mitigate the damage from the accident that happened in the Gulf?
The immigration issue is more important. It's obvious to everyone that we have a problem with the Gulf oil spill and that it needs to be addressed. However, we have a much harder fight to convince the public that we need to end illegal immigration and reduce legal immigration.
Oil spill by a private corporation is the government's fault.Oil spill, just a small Obama fuck up...it's his Katrina and fail president is still fail.
Man, just when I think you've hit intellectual rock bottom you begin to dig. The two issues have no conflicts, and if we can't do both then we just need to turn the country over to Canada. Neither government nor private industry tracks the number of threads on ATP&N.
Just to be clear, Obama is handling neither illegal immigration nor the BP oil well leak. And I believe he is your guy, not mine.
Doing that would sure as hell go a long way in preventing a repeat.
Oil spill by a private corporation is the government's fault.
AhAhAHAHAHAHAhahaa
70% of the American Public support Arizona and a majority want illegals deported. It's not the the public that needs convincing, it's the politicians.
Oh oh... but Bush!Having the government tell people they have to leave but they choose to stay anyways and then the government is slow to get them help is George Bushes fault?
Did George Bushes buddies over at Halliburton bull the levees?
Republican owned businesses need convincing. They need cheap labor. The problem would end if they stopped hiring illegals.
I explained in another thread how government "safety regulations" may have contributed to this incident. Another one of those posts that was conveniently neglected by a large number of idiots who simply kept saying the same thing over and over and over again... I'm not saying you're one of them, as I don't think you posted in that thread, only that all of the threads touting government as the solution and down with BP! are quickly abandoned when the facts of the case are presented.Oil spill by a private corporation is the government's fault.
AhAhAHAHAHAHAhahaa
I explained in another thread how government "safety regulations" may have contributed to this incident. Another one of those posts that was conveniently neglected by a large number of idiots who simply kept saying the same thing over and over and over again... I'm not saying you're one of them, as I don't think you posted in that thread, only that all of the threads touting government as the solution and down with BP! are quickly abandoned when the facts of the case are presented.
The US claims mineral rights in that area (IIRC, up to 200 miles offshore). I don't know whether or not this is "legal" and would hold up in international court. That said, it seems that the US was regulating this particular platform and making a profit off of the licensed mineral rights. Would the incident have occurred if the platform were not subject to negligent regulation enforcement? I don't know. I do know that the warranty model I proposed in the other thread takes the government out of the sticky business of trying to stick its nose in this business (which is obviously a good way to get a black eye in this case), as well as giving financial incentives for companies to properly maintain their own equipment, all the while shrinking government by taking the "enforcer" out of the equation. Bottom line: if you really want to solve problems of companies being unsafe/potentially causing environmental disasters by neglecting regulations, simply allow companies to warranty safety/environmental protection devices and the problem works itself out very quickly.But....they arent in American waters....how is American regulations helpful when they dont apply?
this.The obvious answer to your question is that both can be discussed simultaneously with little problem by those of us with the ability to consider more than one idea at a time.
