Originally posted by: Perknose
As others have pointed out, Chicago has long been traditionally known as the Second City, because for decades it was second in size and population to NY.
The knitting together of once sleepy and disparate communities after WW II by the freeways and its steady growth give
metropolitan LA a strong claim to the title these days, but I agree, LA is NOT a city. There is no "there" there. However, LA now stands at the nexus of East and West, where traditional Western culture meets our Asian brothers in a synergy that for many is the future as represented by "now". And they are probably right.
San Fransisco is hands down the most beautiful and enticing burg in America. I might even surrender my anal virginity for the right to be able to afford to live there.
Under its federal veneer, Washington, DC is still a sleepy southern town. Anyone who knows it intimately knows that's true.
And I retain a strong affection for my home town of Philadelphia. It has irreplaceable culture and history out the wazoo, just in passing. I bought my Accord wagon from a couple who live on
Elfeth's Alley, the oldest continuouly inhabited street in the United States of America.
However, there we have only one true major league metropolis in our great Republic: Gotham, the Big Apple, New York, New York (so nice, I say it twice). There really isn't a second place. If you can make it there . . .