Dear readers, please read the quote below under the caption {For your orientation}, you will know what the thread is all about.
_____________________________
Now, dear readers, this morning I am going to tell you that my opponents here who are in their core into nothing but screeching vulgarities, obscenities, profanities, irrationalities, stupidities, inanities, vacuities, genital and anal morbidities, all from their heart and mind, etc., and not engaged at all in honest intelligent exchange of thoughts with me, in re the issue God exists or not, and the proof of that, is I will bring up one Occams.
From the beginning he already started with irrelevancies and followed through with all kinds and manners of inanities, instead of honest intelligent exchange of thoughts.
Then he ran away and is still into running away.
So, witness how Occams will not ever engage with me to exchange thoughts about my concept of God, namely:
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
Wherefore, let us all sit back and await with bated breath to witness how Occams will dare to undertake with me, the examination of my concept of God, namely:
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
What we have with my opponents here, namely, the deniers of God's existence, is that they are self-marinated with anger, hatred, envy, and all other unproductive emotive attitudes, instead of honest intelligent cognitive research, into the issue God exists or not.
If I were a psychologist, and one of them has the anxiety to seek help with their angst of anger, hatred, envy, etc., I will tell them to do a self-help on themselves: by a most non-partisan examination into an analysis of why so much anger, hatred, envy, etc., in their heart and mind, against God - but directly against religion(s) that has God as the author of sexual morality foremost, in their disciplinary teachings.
You see, dear readers, my opponents can indulge in all kinds and manners of vulgarities, etc. in the anonymous field of the internet, but dare not undertake to debate formally in public openly, on the issue God exists or not.
For instance, take the case of one such denier of God's existence, a darling of my opponents, one Richard Dawkins, he dares not debate with one theistic thinker, William Craig: because he Dawkins will expose himself to be into nothing but all ignorance and all fallacies.
In fact his own i.e. Dawkins' academic colleagues at Oxford, cast aspersions on him, calling him a coward, for not daring to debate in public with William Craig.
Given that there isn't much in the way of serious argumentation in the New Atheists' dialectical arsenal, it should perhaps come as no surprise that Dawkins and Grayling aren't exactly queuing up to enter a public forum with an intellectually rigorous theist like Craig to have their views dissected and the inadequacy of their arguments exposed. {Link available upon public request in this thread.}
{For your orientation}
God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
And here is the OP:
Marius Dejess said:
Title of thread: What I have found out about God.
I have found out that God in concept is the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning.
And how did I find that out?
By reasoning on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas.
What is the benefit to me from the concept of God as the creator cause of man and the universe and everything with a beginning?
It brings me to the certain knowledge that God exists, whereas before I had only the belief that God exists, but not the certain knowledge.
Still I can't get God to talk with me.
{End of post}