what do you think of omega watches?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

yours truly

Golden Member
Aug 19, 2006
1,026
1
81
Originally posted by: Koing
Originally posted by: hopeless74
goodluck in gladiators koing.

squeeze Kirsty Gallaghers bewb for me :p (jk)

she so fit in person. i thought she was good looking before, but when your up close to her she looks simply stunning imo.

shes really well put together with great proportions.

koins

yeah i saw her n ian wright on jonathan ross a couple weeks back. shes stunning

shame gladitors is on sky 1. i loved that show

 

LtPage1

Diamond Member
Jan 15, 2004
6,311
2
0
That's a lot of hardware for a leather band. I'd stick with something more simple if you want a dressy watch.

I do love Omegas, though.
 

sygyzy

Lifer
Oct 21, 2000
14,001
4
76
I love Omegas. Wearing an Aqua Terra Seamaster now. I have a Speedmater Moon at home and I used to have a Dynamic Date but I sold it (bad decision).
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Originally posted by: ObiDon
Originally posted by: jjsole
Not a darn thing that distinguishes that imo with a $70 watch.
that's why i cringe when people mention rolex. when people hear the name rolex, usually they think of the presidential which pretty much looks just like a $300 seiko.

Yeah, except the President is real gold and has a real movement. You can resell a President for most of what you bought it for ...

A Seiko is not even good as a skipping rock when it fails after a year or two and holds no value at all.
 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Originally posted by: JLee
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: JLee
Am I the only guy on AT who is entirely comfortable wearing a $30 Timex Ironman? :confused:
Some people are fine with Hyundai, some get a Maserati.

Different strokes for different folks.

Does an expensive watch really keep time that much better? My dad has a Seiko...he was talking with a friend about how they both lose time and have to keep changing them. Granted, they're not $5000 watches, but they're not 30 bucks, either. I don't have to mess with mine..

Plus, if it gets squashed at work, I'll just buy another one. No tears involved. :p

Nope. In fact, most don't keep time as accurately as a US$5.00 plastic POS.

A Certified Chronometer (mechanical watch) can be off by seconds per week. Pretty much any quartz watch is orders of magnitude more accurate than that.

The things that make the expensive watches expensive are the materials, the craftsmanship (even for as "inaccurate" as they are, it's still better than parts-per-million accuracy), and that they are an investment that many consider on par with artwork.

Nothing looks dumber than some clown dressed in thousands of dollars in suits, shoes, ties & such wearing a $20.00 plastic watch.
 

Playmaker

Golden Member
Sep 17, 2000
1,584
0
0
I don't know much about watches, but for $5k I would think you could get something better than an Omega ... look at IWC or another comparable brand.
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Sure all these look nice but, with the advent of cell phones, watches are redundant. If one is trying to call attention to himself, try a gold or diamond necklace.
 

nageov3t

Lifer
Feb 18, 2004
42,808
83
91
I've never worn a watch... a couple pocket watches, sure, but wearing anything around my wrist drives me up the wall. kinda weird since back in my drag phase I used to wrap bracelets and chains halfway up my arm.

though I'm also young, poor, and never have to dress up outside of weddings and funerals. I might feel differently if I had people to impress.
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Sure all these look nice but, with the advent of cell phones, watches are redundant. If one is trying to call attention to himself, try a gold or diamond necklace.

No one wears a watch for the time anymore. It's more of an accessory.

OP....please reconsider..

Omega watch...Hong Kong....come on now
 

LS21

Banned
Nov 27, 2007
3,745
1
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Sure all these look nice but, with the advent of cell phones, watches are redundant. If one is trying to call attention to himself, try a gold or diamond necklace.

jesus fucking christ
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Sure all these look nice but, with the advent of cell phones, watches are redundant. If one is trying to call attention to himself, try a gold or diamond necklace.
With the advent of cell phones, the brain cell count of our population has apparently plummeted, as you've demonstrated.
 

Oyeve

Lifer
Oct 18, 1999
22,066
882
126
I would look into Breitling. I love aviator style wathces. I like Omega but not that one. I hate Tag watches with a passion. My father in law is an old school watch repair guy. I went into his shop one time and he was working on someones 8k Tag and he pointed out the PLASTIC gears in the watch. PLASTIC! And it was NOT a knock-off either. Never buy Tag. :)
 

krunchykrome

Lifer
Dec 28, 2003
13,413
1
0
Originally posted by: Oyeve
I would look into Breitling. I love aviator style wathces. I like Omega but not that one. I hate Tag watches with a passion. My father in law is an old school watch repair guy. I went into his shop one time and he was working on someones 8k Tag and he pointed out the PLASTIC gears in the watch. PLASTIC! And it was NOT a knock-off either. Never buy Tag. :)

i :heart: my tag
 

seemingly random

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 2007
5,277
0
0
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Sure all these look nice but, with the advent of cell phones, watches are redundant. If one is trying to call attention to himself, try a gold or diamond necklace.
With the advent of cell phones, the brain cell count of our population has apparently plummeted, as you've demonstrated.
So what am I missing here? Should I still be interested in buggy whips?
 

lytalbayre

Senior member
Apr 28, 2005
842
2
81
OP. I love Omegas. The Hour Vision watch you linked is their top of the line with a new movement. It is not a common watch by any means and is definitely well regarded among the watch community.

That being said, you can probably purchase it for much less than the $5500 you stated. PM me if you want info on a US authorized dealer who will pretty much guarantee 30% off MSRP.
 

Descartes

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
13,968
2
0
Originally posted by: Oyeve
I would look into Breitling. I love aviator style wathces. I like Omega but not that one. I hate Tag watches with a passion. My father in law is an old school watch repair guy. I went into his shop one time and he was working on someones 8k Tag and he pointed out the PLASTIC gears in the watch. PLASTIC! And it was NOT a knock-off either. Never buy Tag. :)

I HIGHLY doubt the actual gears were plastic. If your FIL is old-school, he might not be familiar with some of the new components being used in movements. Many of them do indeed look and feel like plastic, but they're just a light alloy that's coated with teflon.

 

ScottMac

Moderator<br>Networking<br>Elite member
Mar 19, 2001
5,471
2
0
Originally posted by: seemingly random
Sure all these look nice but, with the advent of cell phones, watches are redundant. If one is trying to call attention to himself, try a gold or diamond necklace.

Still, that's generally not the point. I have a ~US$5k+ watch (Blancpain 2100 Chrono/Flyback) that is fairly ordinary looking. Certainly, there are a number of "jewelery" watches that are pretty flashy, but there are many more that are unusual design, operation, materials, etc.