disable INTEL ME and unlock BCLKCan you explain how this is relevant to this thread?
I don't see the connection?![]()
disable INTEL ME and unlock BCLKCan you explain how this is relevant to this thread?
I don't see the connection?![]()
Yes but why?i have a question for connoisseurs, can the processor E5-1620V3 be hacked to bios without microcodes so that it can go into full boost?
E5-1620V3 is just old technology simple quad core cpu, you can buy better and faster unlocked K cpus with same money.
Still old tech quad core cpu.Not only does it have 40 pcie lanes, it has a soldered IHS and overclocks to 4.5-4.8 easily.
Remember 1600 series V3 CPUs have its multi unlocked.
I'm looking for another v3 processor, but I do not buy it because I have problems with Asrock x99 itx ac!The 1620 V3 is a far superior CPU compared to it's i7 4790K/4770K siblings.
Not only does it have 40 pcie lanes, it has a soldered IHS and overclocks to 4.5-4.8 easily.
Remember 1600 series V3 CPUs have its multi unlocked.
That's because in advanced power settings for these modes there are set different Minimum processor states. 100% in case of High Performance causes the CPU to always maintain at least its base frequency, effectively turning off EIST.@Dufus
I have disabled Intel ME for my system... see below for in-BIOS status results (before & after).
Modifications were based on instructions provided in the following thread:
https://forums.anandtech.com/threads/disabling-intels-management-engine-me.2517366/
The system boots and operates the same as if ME were enabled. I see no difference in performance with respect to max power limits applied.
Undoubtedly, further testing and investigation is warranted for which I am happy to assist.
For those that wish to attempt the same... some hints from my success:
- The Python script provided (me_cleaner.py) did not work on my modified BIOS. I was required to start with a new BIOS, modify it first using the method provided, edit the resulting ROM to remove the SEC Core write-protection (using UEFI Tool), and finally remove the offending Haswell-E microcode using UBU.
- Running NO microcode with this modification results in all cores locked at HFM (2.3GHz for 2696v3). Turbo'ing to frequencies above HFM (up to and including max Turbo) are possible and works as expected; however, I simply do not see cores falling back to 1.2GHz (LFM) with Windows in "High Performance" mode. Changing this back to "Balanced" results in idle at LFM. And of course, "Power Saver" keeps all cores at LFM regardless of workload. I suspect this has to do with the ICC module this is not loaded...hmmmm
I set myself in windows balanced to power options and in rendering, when in full stress immediately felt an improvement.That's because in advanced power settings for these modes there are set different Minimum processor states. 100% in case of High Performance causes the CPU to always maintain at least its base frequency.
By the way, if you set Maximum processor state as 99%, you will effectively turn off Turbo boost!
Yess i have a good price and solve problems with x99 itx ac, i hoe, who doess see the 2683Still old tech quad core cpu.
Cheapest 2011r3 motherboard starts form 210$, 1620+mobo 600-650$, you can buy brand new Ryzen 8 core system or 7700K system with same price.
if you catch good deal, yes 1620 can be good option but with those prices...
A friend bought 2011-3 mobo for $300, 8-core E5-2630L v3 for $150 (which has been unlocked with my help) and two sticks of 16GB Samsung ECC RDIMM for $250. He could have built a Ryzen system for a comparable amount of money, I guess. But here the advantage is that up to a 22-core Intel Xeon can be installed. I'm sure that their prices on eBay will drop at some point in the future.Still old tech quad core cpu.
Cheapest 2011r3 motherboard starts form 210$, 1620+mobo 600-650$, you can buy brand new Ryzen 8 core system or 7700K system with same price.
if you catch good deal, yes 1620 can be good option but with those prices...
I do not understand why, the board Asrock X99 itx ac does not see the E5 2683 v3, which goes on other boards very well even if it does not have support on those motherboards.Still old tech quad core cpu.
Cheapest 2011r3 motherboard starts form 210$, 1620+mobo 600-650$, you can buy brand new Ryzen 8 core system or 7700K system with same price.
if you catch good deal, yes 1620 can be good option but with those prices...
I dont know why my board
I do not understand why, the board Asrock X99 itx ac does not see the E5 2683 v3, which goes on other boards very well even if it does not have support on those motherboards.
However, it will be a simpler, playable game for a family member.
So I will take that 1620 and sell 2683, hoping that I will solve the problem, which for 2 months I can not solve it
You can only use ECC UDIMMs (unbuffered/unregistered) with the Threadripper. This kind of modules are rare, expensive and their support would still depond on a particular motherboard.agree !
1950x features:
$800 price
16 cores 3.9G
16 cores with SMT
REG ECC 2666 memory support
non-ECC memory DDR4 3000+
64 PCIE lanes
I find it new, at 150 dollars the 1620 v3Still old tech quad core cpu.
Cheapest 2011r3 motherboard starts form 210$, 1620+mobo 600-650$, you can buy brand new Ryzen 8 core system or 7700K system with same price.
if you catch good deal, yes 1620 can be good option but with those prices...