• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

what are you guys gettin wit 3dmark2001?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Well, this is sad. The first time I tried running the benchmark my pc crashed on the second test. Second try, it crashed in the fourth test. My setup is so pitiful I can't even get a score 🙁

Pentium II 400MHz
128 MB Ram
TNT2

All the more reason to love the new pc I'm building 🙂

I did enjoy the demo though...very cool.
 
AMD Duron 600@1050
Asus geforce 2 mx 32mb Default clocks
default setting 1024x768 32bit color
some minor flicker glitches
3 tests skipped due to no hardware support.
detonator 6.50
score: 2537
fsaa: auto-configure.


Not too shabby. I'm on an asus a7v rev1.2 with the latest 1007 bios running via 4.29 4in1's under win2kpro with the M$ ata100 hotfix. 256megs Crucial cas3 pc133 ram. Yeah, cas3 :/ (the staples PM for $79 delivered deal about 2 months ago ; )


 
CPU: Duron 600 o/c 943
MOtherboard: Abit KT7A-RAID
Memory: 256MB 145mhz
Video card: Radeon 64MB 185/190
Driver: 7089
Score: 3075
 
Note to those with Voodoo 5s (at least, based on my tinkering):

The later drivers have an option for 'Geometry Assist' that, when enabled, provides the D3D Hardware T&L option. This is the default if it is available. This does not seem to work with the Matrix scene - I kept getting Dx8 runtime errors. Once I selected 'D3D Software T&L', everything was roses.

Note that while the Hardware T&L option provided a big performance boost in 3DMark2000, I have not noticed a similar jump in 2001 compared to Software T&L. They must have changed something....

--Xander F😎
 
I just tried some good old fashioned overclocking 🙂

Thunderbird 1.2ghz (@109mhz bus), mem PC133 (@145mhz)
Elsa Geforce2 GTS 32mb at clock: 220 /mem: 375.
Using det 7.52 drivers.***

(rest of system can be seen via rigs link in profile)
edit: currently running 98SE which does not reflect rig page

Default benchmark settings used.

3348 3d marks


----previous results---

Thunderbird 1.1ghz (@100mhz bus), mem PC133 (@133mhz)
Elsa Geforce2 GTS 32mb at default clock/mem.
Using det 7.52 drivers.***

(rest of system can be seen via rigs link in profile)
edit: currently running 98SE which does not reflect rig page

Default benchmark settings used.

3028 3d marks.


***
In the D3d control panel of the detonator drivers, I have "alternate depth buffering" enabled for higher quality images, and have "best image quality" as the mode selected.

No compromises these days, why have a pricey video card and run sloppy settings? 🙂
 
Well, I get 3408 running Win2K

No AA, 1024x768x32,Compressed Textures, D3D Hardware T&L

On a Radeon 64MB Vivo (Retail@200/200)
 
1024x768 32bbp scores 3053 3dmarks on p3 966mhz 256mb ram, P3V4X, Retail Radeon 64MB DDR running default 183mhz core/memory, 7089 drivers, Win98SE

*Update* at 200mhz core/memory score went up to 3216
 
726 on a Abit Kt7A Raid, duron 650, 256MB ram, Geforce 2 MX, is that normal. I think that is the lowest score I have seen.
 
PIII 700 @ 933
256 mb 133 CAS2
OC'd BX mobo (133 FSB)
Leadtek GTS 32 (220/363)
10.80 drivers (defaults other than clock)
DX8.0a
Win98

3D Mark 2000: default bench = 7300 3D Marks
3D Mark 2001: default bench = 3195 3D Marks

Observations: Everything seemed to run pretty smooth except for the high polygon, 8 light test. SL...I..D...E SH....O..W. Also, that scene where the guy gets burnt up by the dragon & goes flying off his feet, has to be one of the most poorly animated sequences of all time. WTF?
 
My 3DMark2001 result is:

4822 "3DMarks"

KT7A/TBird at 145/1595mhz (vapochill case)
512mb Crucial Cas2 ram
CL GeForce2 Ultra at 295/524mhz (100% artifact free, mem core voltage at max)
10.80 drivers
dx8
WinME (installed with no pc health/system restore)

 
1217 3d marks

MAtrox g400 MAXX
p3 700e
(rest is on the rig page)

1024x768 32 bit color
d3d software T&L
no anti-alysing
Double frame buffer, 32 z-buffer


Susprised this bad boy got this high...🙂

Edit...Roomate got 1007...hehe...🙂
 
2611

Default 1024x768x32

T-Bird 800@1050 7x150
Asus A7V133
256MB
Creative Annihilator Pro
Win2K
7.52

I think my results are damn good compared to alot here considering that I have a GeForce 256 DDR.
 
p3-650e, cl gf2mx, w98se, not o/c'ed, 3dmark settings all default!

RESULTS
3DMark Score 1634
Game 1 - Car Chase - Low Detail 29.8 fps
Game 1 - Car Chase - High Detail 12.1 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - Low Detail 24.5 fps
Game 2 - Dragothic - High Detail 9.2 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - Low Detail 32.1 fps
Game 3 - Lobby - High Detail 17.2 fps
Game 4 - Nature Not supported by hardware
Fill Rate (Single-Texturing) 155.6 MTexels/s
Fill Rate (Multi-Texturing) 287.9 MTexels/s
High Polygon Count (1 Light) 9.8 MTriangles/s
High Polygon Count (8 Lights) 2.5 MTriangles/s
Environment Bump Mapping Not supported by hardware
DOT3 Bump Mapping 20.4 fps
Vertex Shader 20.9 fps
Pixel Shader Not supported by hardware
Point Sprites 1.0 MSprites/s
 
Got it work finally....if you are having problems with win2k, make sure you have the latest compatibility update 😱

Default
Cel@896
Geforce256 DDR
2028

Dam, my system is getting old..
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top