We’re on the verge of a great, great depression. The [Federal Reserve] knows it.

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
The oil execs were called to congress, so the price is going to go down. Look for prices to go back up as summer passes and people need heating oil for the winter time.

Look for prices to continue to decline for the rest of the month.

And prices falling have nothing to do with oil executives being called to congress.

I was spot on the $5

Paid that here in Chicago and still paying $4.54 today

So it didn't hit it by you, lucky you.

National average for gas never got to $5. You fail.
 

Brovane

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2001
6,364
2,571
136
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Absolutely impossible that I could be right yet again.



I was spot on the $5

Paid that here in Chicago and still paying $4.54 today

So it didn't hit it by you, lucky you.


Filled up this weekend at Costco for $3.96/gallon. Location Irvine, CA.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
The oil execs were called to congress, so the price is going to go down. Look for prices to go back up as summer passes and people need heating oil for the winter time.

But yea, I can see $5 a gallon in the near future.

As for a depression, yea, I can see that too.

With our manufacturing jobs going over seas, its just a matter of time before we hit rock bottom.

yes, because the oil execs can magically make prices go up and down. Jeezus people get a clue.
 

CPA

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
30,322
4
0
Originally Posted by dmcowen674
Absolutely impossible that I could be right yet again.



I was spot on the $5

Paid that here in Chicago and still paying $4.54 today

So it didn't hit it by you, lucky you.


Bullshit. the only state that had over $5/gallon was Hawaii and for good reasons - taxes and delivery cost. You MAY have paid $5 for premium.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,574
972
126
Relax. If the country goes into a real depression the government will just modify the way it collects its relevant economic statistics to show we're actually in a growth period with low inflation.

LOL! They'd have to bring back Bush of course.
 

BeauJangles

Lifer
Aug 26, 2001
13,941
1
0
It may be correct at 6:05, but it is 12 hours off at 18:05. There is only one 6:05 per day.

A) It's a figure of speech.

B) Please tell me what time this clock reads.

OnTime-analog2.png
 

torpid

Lifer
Sep 14, 2003
11,631
11
76
This is not correct. Time is not a static measurement. It seems that way because the units of time are not used in all cases. So 6:05AM of Jun 1, 2011 is not the same as 6:05AM of May 31. You simply say in conversation the time is 6:05, but leave out the full units of measurement.

The motion of an active clock moving forward, relative to time itself, gives definition to the units of time. Therefore a broken clock is never right, because is remains stuck at the time that it was broken. By expanding the units of measurement, we can say the clock displays 6:05AM on the day it was broken. This is not representative of every 6:05AM.

This is a fun point you have, but I think it fails under scrutiny. By your definition, if you forget to wind a watch, then set the time to 6:05AM, at that exact moment it is somehow still not the correct time because it has yet to achieve the motion you indicated above. Only once you then wind it up is it correct, and even then I'm not sure by your definition. Therefore you can never set a wind-up watch to the correct time.
 

tfinch2

Lifer
Feb 3, 2004
22,114
1
0
This is not correct. Time is not a static measurement. It seems that way because the units of time are not used in all cases. So 6:05AM of Jun 1, 2011 is not the same as 6:05AM of May 31. You simply say in conversation the time is 6:05, but leave out the full units of measurement.

The motion of an active clock moving forward, relative to time itself, gives definition to the units of time. Therefore a broken clock is never right, because is remains stuck at the time that it was broken. By expanding the units of measurement, we can say the clock displays 6:05AM on the day it was broken. This is not representative of every 6:05AM.

Not sure if serious
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
This is not correct. Time is not a static measurement. It seems that way because the units of time are not used in all cases. So 6:05AM of Jun 1, 2011 is not the same as 6:05AM of May 31. You simply say in conversation the time is 6:05, but leave out the full units of measurement.
The motion of an active clock moving forward, relative to time itself, gives definition to the units of time. Therefore a broken clock is never right, because is remains stuck at the time that it was broken. By expanding the units of measurement, we can say the clock displays 6:05AM on the day it was broken. This is not representative of every 6:05AM.
Wow, thanks for explaining that to us.
None of us had any idea that time was ever changing.
 

Train

Lifer
Jun 22, 2000
13,585
81
91
www.bing.com
This is not correct. Time is not a static measurement. It seems that way because the units of time are not used in all cases. So 6:05AM of Jun 1, 2011 is not the same as 6:05AM of May 31. You simply say in conversation the time is 6:05, but leave out the full units of measurement.

The motion of an active clock moving forward, relative to time itself, gives definition to the units of time. Therefore a broken clock is never right, because is remains stuck at the time that it was broken. By expanding the units of measurement, we can say the clock displays 6:05AM on the day it was broken. This is not representative of every 6:05AM.

not very often you see someone steal the stupid spotlight away from Dave in a thread.
 

TwiceOver

Lifer
Dec 20, 2002
13,544
44
91
How do we know it won't be a Great Great Great Depression instead of just a Great or Great Great?
 

chin311

Diamond Member
Feb 27, 2003
4,306
3
81
and to think iPad 2's are still sold out...

wait til i tell my grandkids about this
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
I wouldn't go that far. Great depression was pretty bad and we have more assets/wealth than then. We will restructure tho as SHTF.