I'm sure a gtx1180 for $599 that is even 35% faster than a $700 gtx1080ti will fly off the shelves.
It is so not going to be $599, the faster one at least. $750 easy, likely more.
I'm sure a gtx1180 for $599 that is even 35% faster than a $700 gtx1080ti will fly off the shelves.
It is so not going to be $599, the faster one at least. $750 easy, likely more.
The gtx1080 released at $699 for the FE, and $599 for the faster AIB versions.
$50 more for the FE version would be $750. That's normal.
THATS A 7% increase in price over the gtx1080, big deal!
If the 1180 is 40% faster than a gtx1080ti, it will be worth $750.
Do the math, 40% faster for $50 more, thats a no- brainer.
Historically the new Nvidia cards cost $50 more every 2 years or new generation for the same performance tier.
not true, you get ~40% more performance for the same price.I guess the days of increasing perf/$ are over.
But that price creep is brutal!not true, you get ~40% more performance for the same price.
the gtx1180 gives you ~40% more performance for the price of a gtx1080ti.
the 1170 should be $200 cheaper than a 1080ti for the same performance.
But that price creep is brutal!
not true, you get ~40% more performance for the same price.
the gtx1180 gives you ~40% more performance for the price of a gtx1080ti.
the 1170 should be $200 cheaper than a 1080ti for the same performance.
They're not going to release am 1180 unless its enough faster than the 1080ti to be an upgrade for those people. A lot of money at stake there.
All signs so far point to a 1180 that will be 3584 cores, same as 1080 Ti, with a clock and memory boost. 10% perf boost is a possibility.
For 1180 to be 40% faster than 1080 Ti it would have to be a fully unlocked GV100 with 5120 cores and 128 ROPs minus the tensor cores, which is not happening at $699 when there's no competition and Nvidia is making a killing with Tesla V100 at 9k and Titan V at 3k.
Because the 1080 was 40% faster than 980 Ti right? And the 980 was 40% faster than 780 Ti right?
980ti to 1080 was quite a jump. Not 40% I think but definitely enough to be very clearly ahead and enough for the truly keen to upgrade.
There appear to be an awful lot of those so.......
Right now I'm more eager to learn if they're on 12nm or 7nm...
As far as competition goes, Nvidia has been its own competitor at the high end and enthusiast level for a long time. So there is competition.
980ti to 1080 was quite a jump. Not 40% I think but definitely enough to be very clearly ahead and enough for the truly keen to upgrade.
There appear to be an awful lot of those so.......
Was it? I could swear I remember a lot of people saying they didn't feel bad for having bought 980Ti a few months before the 1080 as the performance was fairly comparable. And people that bought the 980Ti were both happy and disappointed. Somewhat happy as they didn't feel compelled to upgrade, but disappointed in hoping it would've been worth upgrading. Perhaps that was the ones buying the aftermarket ones that overclocked quite well.
But I'd suspect they are a big chunk of the profit on the GeForce line.There are some people that upgrade to the newest and fastest card with every new flagship launch, but these are not the bulk of Nvidia's customers.
1180ti by Christmas? My 980ti is still doing fine, but shiny newness appeals to me.
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-turing-faq,37067.html
Toms claims FE cards will be released in July. So an announcement soon at least is not out of the question.